Development of Geometry Module Based on Computational Thinking Assisted by GeoGebra

Heni Lilia Dewi(1*), Santika Lya Diah Pramesti(2),


(1) UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
(2) UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to produce valid and feasible geometry module development research integrated computational thinking assisted GeoGebra. This research uses a type of R&D research that contains three stages, namely (1) (define), (2) (design), and (3) (develop). The research subjects were students in Tadris Matematika FTIK IAIN Pekalongan. Data collection techniques were carried out by conducting observations, questionnaires, and learning outcomes tests. The data analysis techniques used were analysis of the validity of teaching materials, analysis of test items, analysis of feasibility of the module, and analysis of the effectiveness of the module. The results showed that the developed module: (1) valid, after going through the validation process, (2) feasible, because there is a good response about the mathematics teaching materials integrated computational thinking assisted by GeoGebra from students and teachers, and (3) effective, by considering because students' mathematical abilities increase through a geometry module integrated computational thinking assisted by GeoGebra

Keywords


Development, Geometry Module; Computational Thinking; GeoGebra

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anwar, S. (2014). Pengolahan Bahan Ajar. Bandung: UPI.

Arif, T. A., & Iskandar, I. (2018, July). Teknik Penyusunan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Guru di Sekolah Dasar. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan (Vol. 1, No. 1).

Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., & Mardapi, D. (2019). Developing Scientific Literacy-Based Teaching Materials to Improve Students’ Computational Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 482-491. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.19259

Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. M., Minniti, L., & White, B. J. (2017). Computational thinking, grade 1 students and the binomial theorem. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3 (2), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0019-3

Japa, N., Suarjana, I. M., & Widiana, W. (2017). Media Geogebra dalam pembelajaran matematika. International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering, 1(2), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijnse.v1i2.12467

Maharani, A. (2020). Computational thinking dalam pembelajaran matematika menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Euclid, 7(2), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v7i2.3364

Moleong, L. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. remaja Rosdakarya.

So, H. J., Jong, M. S. Y., & Liu, C. C. (2020). Computational thinking education in the Asian Pacific region. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00494-w

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

Rahadyan, A., Hartuti, P. M., & Awaludin, A. A. R. (2018). Penggunaan Aplikasi Geogebra dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal PkM Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(01), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.30998/jurnalpkm.v1i01.2356

Rahmania, S., Sulisworo, D., & Rahma, R. (2023). Pengembangan e-LKPD Bermuatan Program Linear dengan Pendekatan Computational Thinking untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. JEMAS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, 4(1), 45-54. http://www.journal.umuslim.ac.id/index.php/jemas/article/view/1912

Rahmadhani, L. I. P., & Mariani, S. (2021, February). Kemampuan Komputasional Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika SMP Melalui Digital Project Based Learning Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 4, pp. 289-297). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/45048

Sa’diyyah, F. N., Mania, S., & Suharti, S. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 4(1), 17-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i1.p%25p

Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017). Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 22 (1), 469-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9482-0

Ling, U. L., Saibin, T. C., Naharu, N., Labadin, J., & Aziz, N. A. (2018). An evaluation tool to measure computational thinking skills: pilot investigation. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 1, 606-614. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7279-7_64

Widoyoko, E. P. (2010). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Wing, J. M., & Stanzione, D. (2016). Progress in computational thinking, and expanding the HPC community. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 10-11.

Wondo, M. T. S., Mei, M. F., & Seto, S. B. (2020). Penggunaan Media Geogebra dalam Pembelajaran Geometri Ruang untuk Meningkatkan Minat dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v11i2.12049

Zahid, M. Z. (2020, March). Telaah kerangka kerja PISA 2021: era integrasi computational thinking dalam bidang matematika. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 3, pp. 706-713).




DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v12i1.13265

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 46 times
PDF - 10 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching‏‏‎

algototo

toto

slot

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787 href="https://www.happycyclist.org/">SUNDA787 Online SITUS SUNDA787SUNDA787 DaftarSUNDA787 ViralSUNDA787 MaxwinSUNDA787 LoginSUNDA787 Slotslot spadegamingslot onlineslot resmislot hari inislot gacorgacor7selotgacorsitus slotsitus slot gacorslot maxwinslot jackpot maxwin x1000jackpot maxwin x1000judi gameslot shopeepayslot bri onlineslot jackpotslot x500 maxwinslot online terlengkap

slot gacor

slot88

slot online

agen sbobet terpercaya

agen sbobet terpercaya

Login Alternatif 3DSbobet

slot terpercaya

slot gacor hari ini

link slot thailand

slot gacor

slot gacor

situs slot gacor

slot online

maxslot88

slot

demo slot

binus4d

slot88

slot demo

slot gacor

slot gacor

sendok88

toto slot

slot

idnslot

kadang pemahaman baru muncul setelah mahjong ways dijalani pelan mahjong ways sering terlihat berbeda ketika fokus berubah bukan soal cepat atau lambat mahjong ways mengajak membaca alur di tengah permainan yang mengalir mahjong ways menyimpan makna mahjong ways akhirnya dipahami sebagai proses yang berlapis persepsi sering berubah setelah mahjong wins dilihat lebih dalam mahjong wins kadang dipahami dari cara berpikir bukan hasil ada alur tenang yang terbentuk saat mahjong wins dibiarkan mengalir mahjong wins muncul dalam bentuk pengalaman bukan kejutan dari sudut yang jarang diperhatikan mahjong wins terasa nyata ada banyak cara memaknai rtp tergantung sudut pandang pengamat dalam pengamatan jangka panjang rtp memiliki cerita sendiri di balik angka rtp terkadang tersimpan pola pemahaman melihat rtp sebagai bagian dari gambaran yang lebih besar rtp bukan sekadar rujukan namun bagian dari proses berpikir rtp kerap muncul dalam diskusi saat pengalaman mulai dibandingkan rtp menjadi menarik saat dibaca tanpa ekspektasi berlebihan rtp sering dipahami berbeda ketika konteksnya ikut diperhatikan rtp terasa berbeda ketika dilihat dalam alur yang utuh rtp tidak selalu berbicara angka kadang soal pola pikir

slot gacor hari ini

Petugas Administrasi Rumah Sakit Pekanbaru Temukan Celah Cuan Lewat Game Big Bass Bonanza

Yuantoto

LGO234

Slot Gacor