Indonesian students often have difficulty in fulfilling mathematical literacy indicators which results in low mathematical literacy abilities of students in Indonesia. Not only that, the PISA study (which tests students' mathematical literacy skills in several countries) states that Indonesia occupies a lower position when compared to other countries. The purpose of this research is to find out several things that need to be improved to welcome the next PISA study. The method used is a literature study that aims to review past phenomena and phenomena that are currently happening. The results obtained in this study are that the mathematical literacy ability of Indonesian students is still low when compared to other countries such as China, Singapore, Japan, and Argentina. The conclusion obtained is that Indonesian students must start getting used to working on math exercise in HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) type questions which can improve mathematical literacy skills

Abdussakir. (2018). Literasi Matematis dan Upaya Pengembangannya dalam Pembelajaran di Kelas. Seminar Pendidikan Matematika, 1–16. http://respository.uin-malang.ac.id/2400/7/2400.pdf

Anderson, L. W. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

Asmara, A. S., Waluya, S. B., & Rochmad. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas X berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 135–142. https://ejournal.uksw.edu/scholaria/article/download/965/515

Astuti, P. (2018). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 263–268. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19599

Azmi, S. U., Sukestiyarno, & Rochmad. (2020). Pengaruh Kemampuan Literasi Matematika pada Pembelajaran 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasioanal Pasca Sarjana UNNES, 564–569. https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snpasca/article/download/653/570

Chen, S. (2020). The Patterns of China Learning from PISA in Education Monitoring: A Literature Analysis of China “Compulsory Education Quality Monitoring Programme†(CEQMP). International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.484

D’Amelio, A. (2010). Opportunities, Challenges and Statistical Cooperation in The Implementations of a Statistical Literacy Project in Mendoza, Argentina. ICOTS8, 8. www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase

de Vries, J., Feskens, R., Keuning, J., & van der Kleij, F. (2022). Comparability of Feedback in PISA 2015 Across Culturally Diverse Countries. Education Science, 12(145). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020145

Dinni, H. N. (2018). HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills) dan Kaitannya dengan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 170–176. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/%0AHOTS

Dong, L., Seah, W. T., Cao, Y., & Clarke, D. (2019). Student Talk in Large-Size Mathematics Classrooms: A Case Study of A Sequence of Ten Consecutive Lessons in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(3), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09577-1

Fang, D. (2021). Infiltration Strategies of Mathematical Culture in Improving The Mathematical Literacy of Primary School Students. Education Reform and Development, 3(1), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.26689/erd.v3i1.2622

Gradini, E. (2019). Menilik Konsep Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (High Order Thinking Skill) dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Numeracy, 6(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v6i2.475

Hartini, T., Misri, M. A., & Nursuprianah, I. (2018). Pemetaan Kemampuan HOTS Siswa berdasarkan Standar Pisa dan TIMSS untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v7i1.2795

Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme for International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). 04(1), 30–41.

ICME. (2020). International Reflections on The Netherlands Didactics of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20223-1_5

Johar, R. (2012). Domain Soal Pisa untuk Literasi Matematika. Jurnal Peluang, 1(1), 30.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Peta Jalan Generasi Emas Indonesia 2045. In Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Kemendikbud. https://paska.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/170822-V.2-Generasi-Emas-2045-.pdf

Kurniati, D., Harimukti, R., & Jamil, N. A. (2016). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa SMP di Kabupaten Jember dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berstandar PISA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.8058

Manopo, & Rahajeng, R. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Soal HOTS dari Buku Ajar Matematika. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v8i1.9164

Mansur, N. (2018). Melatih Literasi Matematika Siswa dengan Soal PISA. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 140–144. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19574

Masfufah, R., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa melalui Soal PISA. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.825

Masjaya, & Wardono. (2018). Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis dalam Meningkatkan SDM. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 568–574. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Montanesa, D., Firman, & Ahmad, R. (2021). Perbandingan Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia dan Jepang. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i1.246

Natsir, I., & Munfarikhatin, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa berdasarkan Multiple Intelligence dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika. Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3384

OECD. (2018). What 15-year-old Students in Indonesia Know and Can Do Figure. Snapshot of Performance in Reading , Mathematics and Science. PISA 2018, 1–10.

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 ResultS (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do.: Vol. I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.

OECD. (2019b). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu and Zhejiang (China). OECD Publishing, 1, 1–9.

OECD. (2019c). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018: Japan. OECD Publishing, 1–3, 1–10. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-japan.pdf

OECD. (2019d). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Results from PISA 2018: Singapore. OECD Publishing, 1–10.

OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 Results (Volume VI): Are Students Ready to Thrive in An Interconnected World? (Vol. 6). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d5f68679-en.

Pamungkas, M. D., & Franita, Y. (2019). Keefektifan Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Matematika, 5(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i3.557

Purnama, A., Wijaya, T. T., Dewi, S. N., & Zulfah. (2020). Analisis Buku Sistematis Matematika SMA dari Indonesia dan China pada Materi Peluang dan Statistik. Jurnal Cendikia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 04(02), 813–822.

Purwanti, A. F., Mutrofin, & Alfarisi, R. (2021). Analisis Literasi Matematika Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Matematis-Logis Siswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 131–142.

Purwasih, R., Sari, N. R., & Agustina, S. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Mathematical Habits Of Mind Siswa SMP pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Numeracy, 5(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v5i1.318

Riyatuljannah, T., & Fatonah, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v9i1.10089

Sa’adah, M. (2019). Studi Komparatif Reformasi Pendidikan di Singapura dan Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan dan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 7(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v7i1.26499

Sari, R. H. N. (2015). Literasi Matematika : Apa , Mengapa dan Bagaimana ? Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2015, 713–720.

Shinno, Y., Kinone, C., & Baba, T. (2014). Exploring “What Japanese Students Find Important in Mathematics Learning†Based on The Third Wave Project. Proceedings of The North American Chapter of The International Group for The Psychology of Mathematics Education, 5, 169–176. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=eric&AN=ED600018&site=ehost-live&custid=s2775460 NS

Sianturi, I. A. J., Ismail, Z., & Yang, D. C. (2021). A Cross-National Comparison of Mathematical Problems on Numbers and Operations-Related Topics in Five Countries. School Science and Mathematics, 121(2), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12451

Sofyan, F. A. (2019). Implementasi HOTS pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Inventa, III(1), 1–17.

Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. 2(2), 95–126.

Sulistyo, L., & Dwidayati, N. K. (2021). Literasi Matematika Indonesia Perlu Bercermin Literasi Matematika Cina : Tinjauan Literatur. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 4, 1–7.

Suprapto, N. (2016). What Should Educational Reform in Indonesia Look Like? - Learning From The PISA Science Scores of East-Asian Countries and Singapore. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 1–21.

Surani, D. (2019). Studi Literatur : Peran Teknolog Pendidikan dalam Pendidikan 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP, 2(1), 456–469. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/psnp/article/view/5797

Suratno, J., & D.P., S. (2021). Analisi Komparatif Kurikulum Matematika di Indonesia, Korea Selatan, dan Singapura pada Jenjang Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Matematika, 1(1), 64–72. www.journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id

Suryaprani, M. W., Suparta, I. N., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2016). Hubungan Jenis Kelamin, Literasi Matematika, dan Disposisi Matematika terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik SMA Negeri di Denpasar. Seminar Nasional MIPA 2016, 39–46.

Suryapuspitarini, B. K., Wardono, & Kartono. (2018). Analisis Soal-Soal Matematika Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) pada Kurikulum 2013 untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Literasi Siswa. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 876–884.

Tan, O. S., Low, E. L., Tay, E. G., & Yan, Y. K. (2021). Singapore Math and Science Education Innovation: Beyond PISA (O. S. Tan, E. L. Low, E. G. Tay, & Y. K. Yan (eds.)). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1357-9

Tasaki, N. (2017). The Impact of OECD-PISA Results on Japanese Educational Policy. European Journal of Education, 52(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12217

Utami, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Hidayah, I. (2020). Kemampuan Literasi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Siswa Kelas IX A. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 3, 626–633. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/download/37679/15521/

Wulandari, E., & Azka, R. (2018). Menyambut PISA 2018: Pengembangan Literasi Matematika untuk Mendukung Kecakapan Abad 21. De Fermat : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 31–38.

Yudi, Feisyal A., M., Bekti, H., & Sugandi, Y. S. (2020). Manajemen Pendidikan di Negara Cina. Equilibrium: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 17(02), 51–60. https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/Equilibrium

Zahid, M. Z. (2020). Telaah Kerangka kerja PISA 2021 Era Integrasi Computational Thinking dalam Bidang Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 3(2020), 706–713. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Zulkardi, Z., & Kohar, A. W. (2018). Designing PISA-Like Mathematics Tasks in Indonesia: Experiences and Challenges. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012015