The Enhancement of Students’ Mathematical Conceptual Understanding Through RADEC Learning Model

Trisna Nugraha(1*), Sufyani Prabawanto(2),


(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Students’ mathematical conceptual understanding (MCU) as major part of mathematical proficiency needs to be developed since elementary school through a didactic-pedagogical activity. One of these proficiency needs to be developed in the learning of perimeter and area of a plane geometry. The reason is students often find difficulties in understanding those concepts, especially in situations of distance learning due to COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to investigate the achievement and enhancement of students’ MCU through RADEC learning model. This study used quasi-experimental method with non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. Subjects of this research were 56 of 4th graders at one of private school in Bandung, Indonesia. This study found that there are significant differences in the achievement and enhancement of students’ MCU between students who received RADEC learning and direct learning where the RADEC learning model was higher in achieving & enhancing students’ MCU. In addition, the invention of the RADEC learning model on the achievement and enhancement of students’ MCU is in the moderate effect category with the acquisition of Hedges’ g of 0,922 in the level significant effect

Keywords


Mathematical conceptual understanding; RADEC learning model; Perimeter and area; Mathematics for elementary school; Distance learning due to COVID-19 pandemic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andini, W., & Jupri, A. (2017, February). Student obstacles in ratio and proportion learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 812, No. 1, p. 012048). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012048

Borenstein, M., Hedeges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 187-203 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14908-0_2

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). London: Routledge.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). London: Pearson Education.

Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.

Galton, M., & Williamson, J. (2005). Group work in the primary classroom. In Group Work in the Primary Classroom. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392713

Haapasalo, L., & Kadijevich, D. (2000). Two Types of Mathematical Knowledge and Their Relation. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 21(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03338914

Hiebert, J. (2013). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. London: Routledge.

Huang, H.-M. E., & Witz, K. G. (2012). Children’s Conceptions of Area Measurement and Their Strategies for Solving Area Measurement Problems. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v2n1p10

Kalogeropoulos, P., Roche, A., Russo, J., Vats, S., & Russo, T. (2021). Learning Mathematics From Home During COVID-19: Insights From Two Inquiry-Focussed Primary Schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10830

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (Vol. 2101). J. Kilpatrick, & National research council (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Livy, S., Muir, T., & Maher, N. (2012). How Do They Measure Up? Primary Pre-service Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge of Area and Perimeter. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(2), 91–112. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1018652

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2011). The impact of reading ability on TIMSS mathematics and science achievement at the fourth grade: An analysis by item reading demands. TIMSS and PIRLS, 67–108.

Mutodi, P., & Ngirande, H. (2014). Exploring Students’ Ability to Read Mathematics Text: Case Study of Selected Secondary Schools in the Limpopo Province. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2014.11890150

Nugraha, T., Maulana, M., & Jayadinata, A. K. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Kontekstual Berbasis Etnomatematika Budaya Sunda terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Persegi Panjang. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 2(1), 761-770. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpi.v2i1.11212.

Nugraha, T. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis melalui Model RADEC Ditinjau dari Kecenderungan Gaya Belajar pada Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Nugraha, T., Maulana, M., & Mutiasih, P. (2020). Sundanese Ethnomathematics Context in Primary School Learning. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i1.22452

Nugraha, T., & Suparman, S. (2021). Does Students’ Demography Cause Heterogeneity of Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Abilities through Problem-Based Learning ? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 48(8), 47–55. http://www.jonuns.com/index.php/journal/article/view/687/684

Prabawanto, S. (2013). Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah, komunikasi, dan self-efficacy matematis mahasiswa melalui pembelajaran dengan pendekatan metacognitive scaffolding (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Prabawanto, S. (2017, May). The enhancement of students’ mathematical problem solving ability through teaching with metacognitive scaffolding approach. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 1848, No. 1, p. 040014). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983952

Reinke, K. S. (1997). Area and Perimeter: Preservice Teachers’ Confusion. School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 75–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17346.x

Sopandi, W. (2017, September). The quality improvement of learning processes and achievements through the read-answer-discuss-explain-and create learning model implementation. In Proceeding 8th Pedagogy International Seminar 2017: Enhancement of Pedagogy in Cultural Diversity Toward Excellence in Education (Vol. 8, No. 229, pp. 132-139).

Sukardi, R. R., Sopandi, W., & Riandi, R. (2021). Repackaging RADEC learning model into the online mode in science class. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012142

Tan Sisman, G., & Aksu, M. (2016). A Study on Sixth Grade Students’ Misconceptions and Errors in Spatial Measurement: Length, Area, and Volume. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1293–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9642-5

Tossavainen, T., Suomalainen, H., & Mäkäläinen, T. (2017). Student teachers’ concept definitions of area and their understanding about two-dimensionality of area. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1254298

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics. London: Pearson Education UK




DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v10i2.9073

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2022

View My Stats