Examples and Non-examples as a Road to Understanding the Concept of Function

Eka Resti Wulan(1*), Yulia Izza El Milla(2),


(1) IAIN Kediri
(2) STKIP PGRI Lumajang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This qualitative study aims to describe the conceptual understanding of prospective mathematics teachers at STKIP PGRI Lumajang by determining examples and non-examples of functions. This research was conducted by giving tests and interviews with 12 subjects. Data were analyzed using Miles & Huberman model.  This study showed that the subjects investigated whether paired to determine a given statement is a function or not. Subjects focus on specific expressions, e.g., or others that they have previously recognized as a function. However, some subjects used the vertical line test to determine a given graph represents a function or not, although they were unable to explain why the vertical line test was the appropriate method. Their understanding is limited to procedural knowledge such as mental representations and incomplete concept images, then failing to be comprehensively linked to the definition of the concept of function

 

Keywords


Conceptual Understanding; Examples; Function

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bardini, Caroline, Pierce, R., & Vincent, J. (2013). First year university students’ understanding of functions: Over a decade after the introduction of CAS in Australian high schools, what is new. Proceedings of the 9th DELTA Conference on Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics, 2–11.

Bardini, Caroline, Pierce, R., Vincent, J., & King, D. (2014). Undergraduate Mathematics Students’ Understanding of the Concept of Function. Indonesian Mathematical Society Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(2), 85–107.

Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 352–378.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, enhanced pearson eText with loose-leaf version–access card package. Pearson Education, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Ekayanti, A. (2018). Generalisasi teorema aproksimasi weierstrass. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 4(2), 105–112.

Forehand, M. (2005). Bloom’s taxonomy: Original and revised. emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.

Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2006). Primary trainee teachers’ understanding of basic geometrical figures in Scotland.

Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., Panaoura, A., Gravvani, K., & Spyrou, P. (2006). An empirical four-dimensional model for the understanding of function. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 137.

Ghazali, N. H. C., & Zakaria, E. (2011). Students’ procedural and conceptual understanding of mathematics. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(7), 684–691.

Güçler, B., & Heather, T.-M. (2015). A Discursive Approach to Support Teachers’ Development of Student Thinking About Functions. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 562–567.

Hagen, C. (2015). Undergraduate Students’ Understandings of Functions and Key Calculus Concepts. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 574-580

Hejnỳ, M., Jirotková, D., & Kratochvílová, J. (2006). Early conceptual thinking. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 289.

Hitt, F. (1998). Difficulties in the articulation of different representations linked to the concept of function. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 123–134.

Kidron, I., & Picard, T. D. (2006). Concept definition, concept image and the discrete–continuous interplay. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 441.

Larue, R., & Engelke, N. (2015). The Influence of Function and Variable on Students’ Understanding of Calculus Optimization Problems. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 673–677.

Long, C. (2005). Maths concepts in teaching: Procedural and conceptual knowledge. Pythagoras, 2005(62), 59–65.

NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). Virginia: Key Curriculum Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Huberman, M. A., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Noto, M. S., Pramuditya, S. A., & Handayani, V. D. (2020). Exploration of Learning Obstacle Based on Mathematical Understanding of Algebra in Junior High School. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i1.5946

Oehrtman, M., Carlson, M., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that promote coherence in students’ function understanding. Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 27, 42.

Oldham, E., Viseu, F., Martinho, M. H., Doggen, R., Price, E., & Leite, L. (2020). Investigating prospective science and mathematics teachers’ meanings for and representations of functions: An international study. http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/

Panaoura, A., Michael-Chrysanthou, P., Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., & Philippou, A. (2017). A structural model related to the understanding of the concept of function: Definition and problem solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 723–740.

Radiusman, R. (2020). Studi Literasi: Pemahaman Konsep Anak Pada Pembelajaran Matematika. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.6.1.1-8

Ribeiro, A. J., & da Ponte, J. P. (2019). Professional learning opportunities in a practice-based teacher education programme about the concept of function. Acta Scientiae, 21(2), 49–74.

Roh, K. H. (2008). Students’ images and their understanding of definitions of the limit of a sequence. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(3), 217–233.

Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14(3), 293–305.

Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 356–366.

Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2008). Exemplifying definitions: A case of a square. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 131–148.




DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v9i2.7368

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 48 times
PDF - 16 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020

algototo

toto

slot

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787

SUNDA787 href="https://www.happycyclist.org/">SUNDA787 Online SITUS SUNDA787SUNDA787 DaftarSUNDA787 ViralSUNDA787 MaxwinSUNDA787 LoginSUNDA787 Slotslot spadegamingslot onlineslot resmislot hari inislot gacorgacor7selotgacorsitus slotsitus slot gacorslot maxwinslot jackpot maxwin x1000jackpot maxwin x1000judi gameslot shopeepayslot bri onlineslot jackpotslot x500 maxwinslot online terlengkap

slot gacor

slot88

slot online

agen sbobet terpercaya

agen sbobet terpercaya

Login Alternatif 3DSbobet

slot terpercaya

slot gacor hari ini

link slot thailand

slot gacor

slot gacor

situs slot gacor

slot online

maxslot88

slot

demo slot

binus4d

slot88

slot demo

slot gacor

slot gacor

sendok88

toto slot

slot

idnslot

kadang pemahaman baru muncul setelah mahjong ways dijalani pelan mahjong ways sering terlihat berbeda ketika fokus berubah bukan soal cepat atau lambat mahjong ways mengajak membaca alur di tengah permainan yang mengalir mahjong ways menyimpan makna mahjong ways akhirnya dipahami sebagai proses yang berlapis persepsi sering berubah setelah mahjong wins dilihat lebih dalam mahjong wins kadang dipahami dari cara berpikir bukan hasil ada alur tenang yang terbentuk saat mahjong wins dibiarkan mengalir mahjong wins muncul dalam bentuk pengalaman bukan kejutan dari sudut yang jarang diperhatikan mahjong wins terasa nyata ada banyak cara memaknai rtp tergantung sudut pandang pengamat dalam pengamatan jangka panjang rtp memiliki cerita sendiri di balik angka rtp terkadang tersimpan pola pemahaman melihat rtp sebagai bagian dari gambaran yang lebih besar rtp bukan sekadar rujukan namun bagian dari proses berpikir rtp kerap muncul dalam diskusi saat pengalaman mulai dibandingkan rtp menjadi menarik saat dibaca tanpa ekspektasi berlebihan rtp sering dipahami berbeda ketika konteksnya ikut diperhatikan rtp terasa berbeda ketika dilihat dalam alur yang utuh rtp tidak selalu berbicara angka kadang soal pola pikir

slot gacor hari ini

Petugas Administrasi Rumah Sakit Pekanbaru Temukan Celah Cuan Lewat Game Big Bass Bonanza

Yuantoto

LGO234

Slot Gacor