The objective of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of performance evaluation rubrics when applied to Jakarta's cultural heritage structures, specifically focusing on the geometrical material. The Rasch Model, namely the Winstep version 3.73, will be utilized for analysis. The Rasch model offers benefits due to its ability to provide more precise estimations and identify flaws within the model. The rubric-based performance evaluation instrument is utilized to evaluate students' problem-solving abilities, with each problem being assigned a distinct rubric. A total of 381 students were sampled from two distinct schools located in North Jakarta and East Jakarta. The study's results indicate that the Cronbach's alpha value attained is 0.96, which is classified as excellent. The individual's dependability score is 0.91, which falls inside the excellent range. Similarly, the item's reliability score is 0.94, also classified as excellent. The item fit test conducted on the instrument indicates that there is no need to reject any items. The components in this performance evaluation instrument have strong validity and reliability, rendering it appropriate for evaluating student performance

Rasch Model; Performance Assessment; Geometry;

Alfiatin, A. L., & Oktiningrum, W. (2019). Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills Berbasis Budaya Jawa Timur untuk Mengukur Penalaran Siswa SD. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v2i1.3395

Anis, D., Rohendi, D., & Sukandar, A. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Siswa Pada Praktikum Gambar Proyeksi Ortogonal. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 6(2), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.17509/jmee.v6i2.21787

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rating Scale Surveys. In Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences (pp. 21–46). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_2

Brookhart, S. M. (2015). Performance Assessment: Showing What Students Know and Can Do. Learning Sciences International.

Faturrahmann, A., Fachly, A. F. R., Bhakti, T. S. D., Putri, E. N., Puspitasari, C., & Arni, M. (2022). ADAPTATIVE REUSE DAN PENDEKATAN CONTEXTUAL JUXTAPOSITION PADA STASIUN JATINEGARA, JAKARTA. Lakar: Jurnal Arsitektur, 5(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.30998/lja.v5i2.14470

Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. In Rasch measurement transactions: Vol. 21(1), 1095.

Fitri. (2017). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Kinerja Akuntan Menggunakan Pendekatan Rasch Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 3(1), 34–45.

Indihadi, D., Suryana, D., & Ahmad, A. B. (2022). The Analysis of Construct Validity of Indonesian Creativity Scale Using Rasch Model. Creativity Studies, 15(2), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.15182

Karami, H. (2015). Book review: Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Language Testing, 32(4), 545–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214567642

Kartikasari, D. A., & Rahayu, W. (2018). Pemahaman Matematika : Penerapan Model Arcs. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 9, 6–15. Retrieved from doi.org/10.21009/JEP.091.02%0D

Khatimin, N., Aziz, A. A., Zaharim, A., & Mat Yasin, S. H. (2013). Development of Objective Standard Setting Using Rasch Measurement Model in Malaysian Institution of Higher Learning. International Education Studies, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n6p151

Khoriyah, M., & Oktiningrum, W. (2021). Pengembangan soal higher order thinking Skills (HOTS) berbasis budaya lokal blitar untuk mengukur dimensi pengetahuan matematika siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. Bina Gogik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 2579–4647.

Loewenthal, K. M., & Lewis, C. A. (2001). An Introduction to Psychological Tests and Scales. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315782980

Martinková, P., & Zvára, K. (2007). Reliability in the Rasch model. Kybernetika. Retrieved from http://eudml.org/doc/33860

Misbach, I. H., & Sumintono, B. (2014). Pengembangan dan Validasi Instrumen Persepsi Siswa Tehadap Karakter Moral Guru di Indonesia dengan Model Rasch. PROCEEDING Seminar Nasional Psikometri, 148–162.

Muslihin, H. Y., Suryana, D., Ahman, A., Suherman, U., & Dahlan, T. H. (2022). Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of the Self-Determination Questionnaire Using Rasch Model. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15212a

Nasir, A. M., & Syartina, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Polya Model Problem Solving Method on Student Learning Outcomes in Solving Math Story Problems. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v10i2.8700

Ningsih, G., & Rahayu, W. P. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Psikomotor Berbasis Proyek Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Psikomotor Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Blended Learning Di Era New Normal. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Pendidikan, 1(34), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.17977/um066v1i52021p418-424

Nordrum, L., Evans, K., & Gustafsson, M. (2013). Comparing student learning experiences of in-text commentary and rubric-articulated feedback: strategies for formative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 919–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.758229

Oberg, C. (2010). Guiding Classroom Instruction Through Performance Assessment. Journal of Case Studies in Accreditation and Assessment, 1, 1–11.

Ocy, D. R., Rahayu, W., & Makmuri, M. (2023). RASCH MODEL ANALYSIS: DEVELOPMENT OF HOTS-BASED MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTION ABILITY INSTRUMENT ACCORDING TO RIAU ISLANDS CULTURE. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(4), 3542. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i4.7613

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002

Polya, G. (1973). How To Solve (2nd Ed). Princeton: University Press.

Purnomo, Y. W. (2013). Komputasi Mental untuk Mendukung Lancar Berhitung Operasi Penjumlahan dan Pengurangan pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, (November), 657–662.

Putra, Z. H., Hermita, N., & Alim, J. A. (2021). Analisis Pengetahuan Matematika, Didaktika, dan Teknologi Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan Rasch Model. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i3.1042

Ratumanan, T. G., & Laurens, T. (2016). Analisis Penguasaan Objek Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 1(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v1i2.4005

Salsabila, F., Nurihsan, J., & Sunarya, Y. (2023). Pengujian Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Manajemen Diri Remaja:Rasch Model Analysis. Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling Terapan, 07(01), 86–102. Retrieved from https://ojs.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/bkt/article/view/234/158

Sarwoedi, S., Marinka, D. O., Febriani, P., & Wirne, I. N. (2018). Efektifitas etnomatematika dalam meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematika siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 3(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/jpmr.v3i2.7521

Sumintono, B. (2018). Rasch Model Measurements as Tools in Assesment for Learning. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.11

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi pemodelan rasch pada assessment pendidikan. In Trim komunikata. Trim komunikata.

Suryani, Y. E. (2018). Aplikasi Rasch Model dalam Mengevaluasi Intelligenz Structure Test (IST). Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 3(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v3i1.2052

Taufiq, A., Yudha, E. S., Md, Y. H., & Suryana, D. (2021). Examining the Supervision Work Alliance Scale: A Rasch Model Approach. The Open Psychology Journal, 14(1), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350102114010179

Yasin, R. M., Yunus, F. A. N., Rus, R. C., Ahmad, A., & Rahim, M. B. (2015). Validity and Reliability Learning Transfer Item Using Rasch Measurement Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.143

Yudha, R. P. (2020). Validity And Reliability Rubric Of Performance Assessment Geometry Study In Junior High School Using The Many Facet Rasch Model Approach. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i2.7100

Zakiah, I., Hendriana, H., & Hidayat, W. (2022). The Effect of Contextual Learning Trough Teaching Materials Application-Based on Problem Solving Ability. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v11i1.9604