Implementation of H5P-assisted Teaching Materials  on Mathematical Understanding Based on Learning Style

Arif Abdul Haqq; Hendri Handoko; Anita Syafianti

doi:10.24235/eduma.v13i2.16608

Implementation of H5P-assisted Teaching Materials on Mathematical Understanding Based on Learning Style

Arif Abdul Haqq^(1*), Hendri Handoko⁽²⁾, Anita Syafianti⁽³⁾,

(1) UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(2) Tadris Matematika UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(3) Tadris Matematika UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the impact of H5P-assisted teaching materials on students' mathematical understanding, with a focus on the role of learning styles. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group model, the research was conducted among students from two homogeneous classes within the Mathematics Education Program at UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. The participants consisted of 99 students selected through purposive sampling based on their initial mathematical abilities to ensure comparability between groups. These participants were then divided into an experimental group, which utilized H5P interactive teaching materials, and a control group, which received conventional instruction. The findings indicated that students with a visual learning style exhibited significantly greater enhancements in mathematical understanding compared to those with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles after exposure to H5P-assisted materials. ANOVA and multiple comparison (LSD) tests revealed significant differences between the visual group and both the auditory and kinesthetic groups, with no significant differences between the latter two groups. These results highlight the importance of tailoring teaching materials to students' learning styles to enhance mathematics learning outcomes

Keywords

Mathematical understanding; Learning Style; H5P; Digital Teaching Materials

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahshan, R. (2021). A framework of implementing strategies for active student engagement in remote/online teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090483

Alkooheji, L., & Al-Hattami, A. (2018). Learning style preferences among college students. International Education Studies, 11(10), 50-63.

Amali, M., et al. (2019). H5P: Interactive Content Creation. H5P.org.

Arif, A. H., Rochmad, & Isnarto (2022). Eksplorasi situasi didaktis materi geometri berbantuan video interaktif H5P melalui pendekatan humanistik. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 5, 128-139

Baiduri, N. (2019). Peran Guru dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.36706/jls.v1i1.9565

Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 808-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.004

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

Cahyani, A. R. (2018). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar dan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar IPS. Joyful Learning Journal, 7(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.15294/jlj.v7i1.23230

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons

Cordero-Siy, E., & Ghousseini, H. (2022). Supporting Understanding Using Representations. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 115(6), 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520074

Davadas, S. D., & Lay, Y. F. (2017). Factors affecting students’ attitude toward mathematics: A structural equation modeling approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 517-529. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80356

Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Pearson.

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. J. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston,

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.

Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. ND Fleming

Haqq, A., Nasihah, D., & Muchyidin, A. (2018). Desain Didaktis Materi Lingkaran pada Madrasah Tsanawiyah. EduMa: Mathematics Education Learning And Teaching‏‏‎, 7(1), 71 - 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v7i1.2731

Inayah, N., Muchyidin, A., & Toheri, T. (2024). Analysis of Mathematics Content Knowledge of Mathematics Teachers Based on Bloom's Taxonomy Revision. Educational Insights, 2(1), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.58557/eduinsights.v2i1.36

Kartimi, K., Chandra, E., & Riyanto, O. R. (2023). The Influence of H5P Interactive Video on Stereoisomer Understanding in Terms of Learning Style. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i3.42757

Kartimi, K., Chandra, E., & Riyanto, O. R. (2024, May). The impact of interactive H5P video learning on the understanding of stereoisomers based on learning management system. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3116, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Keefe, J. W., & Ferrell, B. (1990). Learning Style: Theory and Practice. National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2014). Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement. Learning and Instruction, 32, 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003

Locke, E. A., & Bandura, A. (1987). Social Learning Theory and Self-Efficacy. In Self-efficacy in Changing Societies (pp. 3-21). Cambridge University Press.

MacFarlane, L. A., & Ballantyne, E. (2018). Bringing videos to life with H5P: Expanding experiential learning online. Proceedings of the Atlantic Universities ‘Teaching Showcase, 22, 28-33. Retrieved from https://ojs.library.dal.ca/auts/article/view/10186

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning principles and applications. Yogyakarta: Student Library.

McNeil, N. M., Hornburg, C. B., Devlin, B. L., Carrazza, C., & McKeever, M. O. (2019). Consequences of individual differences in children's formal understanding of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 90(3), 940-956. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12948

Murtiyasa, A. (2015). Pembelajaran Interaktif dengan Teknologi dalam Pendidikan Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 12-20.

Noroozi, O., et al. (2012). The role of social interaction in learning: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 371-393.

Nur, Z. E. H., Raharjo, H., & Wahid, S. (2023). Development of Quizizz Application E-Module-Based Teaching Materials on Student Mathematics Learning Outcomes. Educational Insights, 1(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.58557/eduinsights.v1i1.7

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing.

Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., Muñoz-Rujas, N., Rodríguez-Arribas, S., Escolar-Llamazares, M. C., Alonso-Santander, N., ... & Mercado-Val, E. I. (2021). Teaching and learning styles on moodle: An analysis of the effectiveness of using stem and non-stem qualifications from a gender perspective. Sustainability, 13(3), 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031166

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense-Making in Mathematics. Journal of Education, 196(2), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202

Sinnayah, P., Salcedo, A., & Rekhari, S. (2021). Reimagining physiology education with interactive content developed in H5P. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00021.2020

Surya, E., Putri, F. A., & Mukhtar. (2017). Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability and Self-Confidence of High School Students through Contextual Learning Model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2813.9-18

Turmudi, T., & Rahayu, P. (2023). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik, 4(2), 233-238. Retrieved form: https://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/pendidikanmatematika/article/view/3519/0

Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. Routledge.

Walsh, J. N., O'Brien, M. P., & Costin, Y. (2021). Investigating student engagement with intentional content: An exploratory study of instructional videos. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 100505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100505

Weylin, Raharjo, H., Haqq, A. A., & Larsari, V. N. (2023). Empowering Students in the Digital Era: An Analysis of Interactive E-Modules’ Effect on Digital Mathematical Communication. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v1i02.401

DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v13i2.16608

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

View My Stats

Username
Password
Remember me