MODEL SOAL UJIAN NASIONAL MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA SMP DITINJAU DARI KRITERIA NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS
(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The research aims to: obtaining (1) a description of the types of materials , mathematical ability, and the level of complexity, (2) a description of the absorption of the material, (3) a model of matter UN in terms of NAEP as an alternative evaluation of learning mathematics. This study uses a model of Plomp development consisting of preliminary investigation, design, the realization phase, test, evaluation, and revision, and implementation phases. Type of device being developed is the UN test criteria were reviewed from NAEP and validation sheet. The device is validated experts and colleagues then tested on the subject of new students of class X-2 SMAN 2 Mranggen. The test results were analyzed with biserial correlation, product moment, Hoyt, level of difficulty and discrimination power. The first trial invalid on multiple-choice number 4, 5, 14,15, 16, and 17. Reliability in one package at a high 0.931. The second trial on multiple-choice questions that all valid. At number 7 short answer is invalid, and valid for all extended construction. Reliability on the second package of 0.904 is high. To be able to apply this test the model is necessary to develop and test further.
Keywords : NAEP, Procedural Knowledge, Understanding Concepts, Problem Solving, Absorption Student
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Azwar, Saifudin. 2012. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Burton, J. S, dkk. 1991. How to Prepare Better Multiple-Choice Test Items: Guidelines for University Faculty. Brigham Young University Testing Services and The Department of Instructional Science.
Hall, J. dan Matthews, E. 2008. “The Measurment of Progress and The Role of Educationâ€. European Journal of education. Volume 43 No.1.
Har, B. Y. 2010. “Improving Mathematical Thinking through Assesmentâ€. Journal of Science and Mathematic Education In Southeast Asia. Volume 33. No. 2. Hal 187-197.
NCES. 2006. Comparing Mathematics Content in NAEP, TIMSS, and PISA 2003 Assesment. Amerika Serikat: U.S. NCES dan Department of Education.
NCES. 2009. NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress. Amerika Serikat: U.S. NCES dan Department of Education.
Permendiknas Republik Indonesia No. 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi Untuk Satuan pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Rochmad. 2012. “Desain Model Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematikaâ€. Jurnal Kreano Unnes. Volume 3 No. 1.
Yunengsih, Y., Widiatmika, & Candrasari. 2008. Ujian Nasional: Dapatkah Menjadi Tolak Ukur Standar Nasional Pendidikan (Hasil Kajian Ujian Nasional Sekolah Menengah Pertama). Jakarta: Sampoerna Foundation
DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v4i1.15
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 694 timesPDF - 289 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching