How Do Students Thinking Processes in Solving Originality and Elaboration Problems of Mathematical Creative Thinking Based on Brain Domination?

Bayu Sukmaangara(1*), Sri Tirto Madawistama(2),


(1) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(2) Siliwangi University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Thought processes and brain dominance can be applied in the field of education because of the linkages between neuroscience, psychology, and education. The thinking process of students can assist teachers in planning the learning process, while brain dominance is an important factor in student performance so it is important to know students' thinking processes based on brain dominance in the learning process. This research aims to describe students’ thinking processes in solving originality and elaboration problems on mathematical creative thinking based on brain dominance. The research method used is qualitative with a descriptive exploratory approach. The instrument used is a matter of mathematical creative thinking that meet the indicators of originality and elaboration, brain dominance tests, and unstructured interviews. The Subject selected research was 3 subjects, namely 1 subject dominated by the left brain, 1 subject dominated by a balanced brain, and 1 subject dominated by the right brain. The subject is a class IX student of SMPN 1 Kota Tasikmalaya. The result of the research is that the thinking process of students in solving originality and elaboration questions creative thinking mathematically based on brain dominance in solving problems cannot be separated from the function of the right and left hemispheres. The thinking process of students in solving problems shows that students use the characteristics of the function of the hemispheres of the brain according to the dominance of the student's brain

Keywords


Thought Process; Originality; Elaboration; Mathematical Creative Thinking; Brain Domination.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher Immediacy as a Predictor of Teaching Effectiveness. Annals of the International Communication Association, 3(1), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1979.11923782

Andrew, M. D., Cobb, C. D., & Giampietro, P. J. (2005). Verbal ability and teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105279928

Caine, R. N. R., & Caine, G. (1990). Understanding a brain-based approach to learning and teaching. Educational Leadership. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8d58/b6af940e0117fcd4f52ef7e73e16690261f5.pdf

Clark, R. E. (1984). Research on Student Thought Processes During Computer-Based Instuction. Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 2–5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30220755

Falcone, D. J., & Loder, K. (1984). A Modified Lateral Eye-Movement Measure, The Right Hemisphere and Creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 823–830. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2466/pms.1984.58.3.823

Ferdinand, F., & Ariebowo, M. (2009). Praktis Belajar Biologi untuk Kelas XI Sekolah Menengah Atas / Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x

Hastjarjo, D. (1999). Belajar Implist: Tidak Tahukah Kita Bahwa Kita Tahu?. Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Psikologi, 3(7), 26-33. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/Psikologika/article/view/8531

Haylock, D., & Thangata, F. (2007). Key Concept in Teaching Primary Mathematics. California: SAGE Publications.

Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Hard Skills and Soft Skills Matematik Siswa. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Jensen, E. (2008). Brain Based Learning (Yusron, N., Trans.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 48, Issue 09). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-5383

Kordjazi, Z., & Ghonsooly, B. (2015). Brain dominance and test format: A case of vocabulary. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0603.29

Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem Solving in Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_129

Lusiana, R., & Andari, T. (2022). Students’ creative thinking ability in solving linear equation system problems based on brain domination. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 8(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v8i1.17493

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 1304). California: SAGE Publications.

Mottweiler, C. M., & Taylor, M. (2014). Elaborated role play and creativity in preschool age children. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 277–286. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0036083

Mulyasa, E. (2010). Menjadi Guru Profesional: Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan (Edisi 9). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munandar, U. (2014). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Nurazizah, sofia icha, Muhtadi, D., & Hermanto, R. (2022). Proses Berpikir Peserta Didik Menurut Edward De Bono dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematik Ditinjau dari Dominasi Otak. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37058/jarme.v4i1.4290

Nurdayanti, S., Putri, A. N., & Nevrita. (2020). Analisis Aspek Originality Pada Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Materi Perubahan Lingkungan. Eduscience : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 33–37.

Oktaviani, M. A., Sisworo, & Hidayanto, E. (2018). Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Berkemampuan Spasial Tinggi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Open-ended Berdasarkan Tahapan Wallas. Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(7), 935–944. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/

Olivia, F. (2013). Otak Kiri dan Otak Kanan Anak Sama Penting. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Ozdogru, A. (2014). Mind, Brain, and Education: An Emerging Transdisciplinary Field of Learning and Development. The Journal of Neurobehavioral Sciences, 1(3), 95. https://doi.org/10.5455/jnbs.1408373410

Permatasari, S. (2020). Proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri ruang berdasarkan dominasi kerja otak. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical Discovery. New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://www.isinj.com/mt-usamo/Mathematical Discovery Polya (1981, Wiley).pdf

Saida, A., Ikram, M., & Salwah. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Creative Thinking in Solving Cuboid Problems. International Journal of Progressive Mathematics Education, 1(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22236/ijopme.v1i2.7307

Savic, M. (2016). Mathematical problem-solving via wallas’ four stages of creativity: Implications for the undergraduate classroom. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1377

Sekar, & Sarining, D. K. (2017). The Analysis of Creative Thingking Ability in Science Subject Matter of the Fourth Grade Students in SD N. 2 Pemaron Buleleng Sub-Distric. Journal of Psychology and Instructions, 1(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v1i1.9627

Shadrikov, V. D., Kurginyan, S. S., & Martynova, O. V. (2016). Psychological studies of thought: Thoughts about a concept of thought. Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 13(3), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2016-3-558-575

Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative Productivity: A Predictive and Explanatory Model of Career Trajectories and Landmarks. Psychological Review, 104(1), 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66

Singh, P. (2015). Interaction Effect of Brain Hemispheric Dominance and Home Environment on Academic Achievement in Mathematics. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(11), 746–750. https://doi.org/10.21275/v4i11.20111502

Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 4(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0114-z

Subanji. (2007). Proses Berpikir Penalaran Kovariasional Pesudo dalam Mengontruksi Grafik Fungsi Kejadian Dinamika Berkebalikan. UNESA, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi 3). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmaangara, B. (2020). Analisis Proses Berpikir Matematis berdasarkan Tahapan Wallas dan Resiliensi Matematis ditinjau dari Dominasi Otak Siswa. Tasikmalaya, Universitas Siliwangi, Indonesia.

Sukmaangara, B., Arhasy, E. A., & Madawistama, S. T. (2020). Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Dominasi Otak Seimbang. Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 2(2), 119–131. http://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/jarme/article/view/1739/1241

Sukmaangara, B., Muhtadi, D., & Madawistama, S. T. (2021). Bagaimana Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau Dari Dominasi Otak ? Journal of Authentic Research on Mathematics Education (JARME), 3(2), 151–164.

Susantini, E., Isnawati, & Lisdiana, L. (2016). Effectiveness of genetics student worksheet to improve creative thinking skills of teacher candidate students. Journal of Science Education, 17(2), 74–79.

Sutiyatno, S. (2018). The Effect of Teacher’s Verbal Communication and Non-verbal Communication on Students’ English Achievement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0902.28

Tendero, J. B. (2000). Hemispheric Dominance and Language Proficiency Levels in the Four Macro Skills of the Western Mindanao State University College Students [Western Mindanao State University, Filipina]. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003233961-9

Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Manual for Scoring and Interpreting Results. Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service.

Torrance, E. P., & Rockenstein, Z. L. (1988). Styles of Thinking and Creativity. Springer Science + Business Media New York, 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.1986.11672705

Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). The National Research Center on The Gifted and Talented. Sarasota: Center for Creative Learning.

Wahyuni, A. (2017). The Power of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication in Learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 125(Icigr 2017), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.19

Wang, Y., & Hou, Q. (2018). Insight or Originality: A Spray in the River of Creative Thinking. Open Access Library Journal, 05(09), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104847

Weigmann, K. (2013). Educating the Brain. Science & Society, 14(2), 136–139. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.213

Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. The Psychological Bulletin, 50(5), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060857

Wulandari, Y. O. (2014). Proses Berpikir Aljabar Siswa Berdasarkan Taksonomi Marzano [Tesis, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia]. http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/disertasi/article/view/36027

Yohanes, R. S. (2013). Proses Berpikir Dua Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Dominasi Otak Kiri dan Otak Kanan. Widya Warta, 27(01), 1–18. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/116789




DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v12i2.13649

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023

slot thailand

wetogel

slot gacor

Stockity

Stockity Login

Stockity Daftar

Stockity Web

Daftar Stockity

Login Stockity

Stockity Official

Stockity Indonesia

slot dana

bosjp

https://www.worldlakes.org/

mandiri88

slot dana

View My Stats

 

klik4d