Case Study: Future Home Design Project for Developing Pro-Environmental Attitudes

Eko Yuliyanto

doi:10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i1.4393

Case Study: Future Home Design Project for Developing Pro-Environmental Attitudes

Eko Yuliyanto^(1*),

(1) Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The results of the learning evaluation indicate that many students do not apply to pro-environmental attitudes. This case study research investigated the potential of making future home designs to develop a pro-environmental attitude. The study was conducted in two stages and involved thirty-five students. In the first stage, the students discussed plants, water, electricity, and garbage at home. The results of the discussion were formulated to be future home designs. In the second stage, the students designed future homes. The results show that the students can implement their ideas into 2-dimensional (2D). The results indicate that most of the students can implement their ideas as much as 86%. The students enthusiastically participated in the learning process. The results show that all students have plants, 11% use Light Emitting Diode (LED), 6% use solar lighting, 71% use proper water sanitation, 54% apply waste management, and 81% have bio pores. It can be concluded that future home design project has the potential to develop a pro-environment attitude.

Keywords

Future home design, Pro-environmental, Attitude

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abimaje, J., & Akingbohungbe, D. O. (2013). Housing and climate change in the Nigerian built environment. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 3(4), 122-128.

Agung, A. P., Aryani, N. K., & Jie, F. (2015). The influence of ecotourism development of Jatiluwih village in Tabanan regency of Bali province to the development of economy, social, culture, and environment. International Journal of Information, Business, and Management, 7(1), 324-349.

Ahemen, I., De, D. K., & Amah, A. N. (2014). A review of solid state white light emitting diode and its potentials for replacing conventional lighting technologies in developing countries. Applied physics research, 6(2), 95-108. doi: 10.5539/apr.v6n2p95

Akadiri, P. O., Chinyio, E. A., & Olomolaiye, P. O. (2012). Design of a sustainable building: A conceptual framework for implementing sustainability in the building sector. Buildings, 2(2), 126-152. doi: 10.3390/buildings2020126

Aryani, S. M., Mulyadi, & Wahyuningsih, I. E. S. (2015). The house design transformation: the preferences and the patterns. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 717-724. doi; 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.084

Astuti, L. T. M., Tjiptoherijanto, P., Haeruman, H., & Koestoer, R. (2015). Model of sustainable wellbeing on decent house Study case of Bekasi City, West Java, Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 370-379. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.046

Bakar, A., Soo Cheen, K., & Rahmawaty, R. (2011). Sustainable housing practices in malaysian housing development: Towards establishing sustainability index. International Journal of Technology, 2(1), 84-93. doi:10.14716/ijtech.v2i1.49

Brejnrod, K. N., Kalbar, P., Petersen, S., & Birkved, M. (2017). The absolute environmental performance of buildings. Building and environment, 119, 87-98. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.04.003

CastÃ©ra, J., ClÃ©ment, P., Munoz, F., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How teachers' attitudes on GMO relate to their environmental values. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 57, 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.04.002

Chuvieco, E., Burgui-Burgui, M., Da Silva, E. V., Hussein, K., & Alkaabi, K. (2018). Factors affecting environmental sustainability habits of university students: Intercomparison analysis in three countries (Spain, Brazil and UAE). Journal of cleaner production, 198, 1372-1380. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.121

Elias, E. M., & Lin, C. K. (2015). The empirical study of green buildings (residential) implementation: perspective of house developers. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 28, 708-716. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.083

FilippÃn, C., Larsen, S. F., & Ricard, F. (2018). Improvement of energy performance metrics for the retrofit of the built environment. Adaptation to climate change and mitigation of energy poverty. Energy and Buildings, 165, 399-415. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.050

Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), 1-17. doi: 10.17169/fqs-18.1.2655

Iyer-raniga, U., & Dalton, T. (2017). Challenges in aligning the architecture profession in Indonesia for climate change and sustainability. Procedia Engineering, 180, 1733â€“1743. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.336

Kusuma, T. H. (2012). Analysis of factors affecting house ownership in Indonesia. American Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 1â€“12.

Latif, S. A., Omar, M. S., Bidin, Y. H., & Awang, Z. (2013). Role of environmental knowledge in creating pro-environmental residents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 866-874. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.088

Liu, Y., VerÃssimo, D., & Farhidi, F. (2016). Using social norm to promote energy conservation in a public building. Energy & Buildings, 133, 320-36. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.041

Maoludyo, F. T., & Aprianingsih, A. (2015). Factors influencing consumer buying intention for. Journal of Busines And Management, 4(4), 484â€“493.

Mccluskey, W. J., Daud, D. Z., & Kamarudin, N. (2014). Boosted regression trees. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction Article information, 19(2), 152-167. doi: 10.1108/JFMPC-06-2013-0022

Monkkonen, P. (2013). UCLA Author Urban land-use regulations and housing markets in developing countries : Evidence from Indonesia on the importance of enforcement. Land Use Policy, 34, 255-264. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.015

Nagel, I., & Lemel, Y. (2019). Poetics The effects of parents â€™ lifestyle on their children â€™ s status attainment and lifestyle in the Netherlands. Poetics, 74, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2019.03.002

Park, S., & Mattson, R. H. (2009). Therapeutic Influences of Plants in Hospital Rooms on Surgical Recovery. Holt Science, 44(1), 102â€“105.

Prihanto, T. (2015). Kota Semarang ditinjau dari rencana pembangunan jangka menengah daerah. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi (Sainteknol), 10(2), 153â€“164.

Rahmanian, N., Ali, S. H. B., Homayoonfard, M., Ali, N. J., Rehan, M., Sadef, Y., & Nizami, A. S. (2015). Analysis of physiochemical parameters to evaluate the drinking water quality in the State of Perak, Malaysia. Journal of Chemistry, 2015, 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2015/716125

Sharma, R., & Jha, M. (2017). Values influencing sustainable consumption behaviour: Exploring the contextual relationship. Journal of Business Research, 76, 77-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.010

Singh, D., Basu, C., Meinhardt-wollweber, M., & Roth, B. (2015). LEDs for energy-efficient greenhouse lighting. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49, 139â€“147. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.117

Slavoljub, J., Zivkovic, L., Sladjana, A., Dragica, G., & Zorica, P. S. (2015). To the environmental responsibility among students through developing their environmental values. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 317-322. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.128

Song, X., & Ye, C. (2017). Climate change adaptation pathways for residential buildings in southern China. Energy Procedia, 105, 3062-3067. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.635

Takaguchi, H., Nakajima, Y., Kawamura, K., Uchida, S., Tonooka, Y., & Sagane, A. (2014). Research on the environmental performance of a natural material wooden house. Energy Procedia, 61, 1677-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.190

Vilcekova, S., Selecka, I., & Burdova, E. K. (2016). Sustainability assessment of family house. Energy Procedia, 96, 551-559. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.098

Yep, B., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Aquaponic trends and challenges - A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 1586-1599.doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.290

Zhu, Y., & Lin, B. (2004). Sustainable housing and urban construction in China. Energy and Buildings, 36(12), 1287-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.11.007

DOI: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i1.4393