Fluid Learning with Arduino-Based on Engineering Design Process (EDP) to Improve Student's Problem Solving Ability

Ratih Eka Maryati(1*), Anna Permanasari(2), Didit Ardianto(3),


(1) SMA Negeri 1 Cigombong, Science Education, Postgraduate, Universitas Pakuan, West Java
(2) Science Education, Postgraduate, Universitas Pakuan, West Java
(3) Science Education, Postgraduate, Universitas Pakuan, West Java
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to obtain an overview of physics learning on the topic of fluid material with an Arduino-based engineering design process (EDP) to improve students' problem-solving abilities. This study used a quasi-experimental research method with a pretest-posttest control group design. The subjects in this study were students of class XI MIPA by taking two groups of subjects using a purposive sampling technique. The sample for the experimental class was 36 people and the control class was 36 people, so the total number of research subjects was 72 people. The learning implementation instrument was carried out using an observation sheet. The results of the ability to solve problems are measured using a description test which includes indicators of problem-solving abilities. Student responses using a Likert scale. The results of the data analysis showed that the average N-Gain achievement was in the medium category and the results of the independent test showed a significant difference in increasing problem-solving skills. Most of the students gave positive responses to learning with Arduino-based EDP, felt happy and motivated, provided benefits, every process undertaken by students provided challenges in solving the problems they faced so that fluid learning using the Arduino-based engineering design process (EDP) stages was able to improve students' ability to solve problems.

Keywords


Arduino, EDP, Fluid learning, Problem-solving, Physics learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Antika, R. R. (2014). Proses pembelajaran berbasis student centered learning. BioKultur, 3(1), 251–263.

Apriyono, J. (2013). Collaborative learning: A foundation for building togetherness and skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 17(1), 292–304.

Ariandi, Y. (2014). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah berdasarkan aktivitas belajar pada model pembelajaran PBL. (1996), 579–585.

Asunda, P. A., & Walker, C. (2019). Integrated STEM: Views and challenges of engineering and technology education K-12 teachers. Career and Technical Education Research, 43(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.5328/cter43.2.179

Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High school student perceptions of the utility of the engineering design process: creating opportunities to engage in engineering practices and apply math and science content. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9498-4

Carberry, A. R., Lee, H. S., & Ohland, M. W. (2010). Measuring engineering design self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01043.x

Chan, Z. C. Y. (2012). Role-playing in the problem-based learning class. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.04.008

Ejiwale, J. A. (2012). Facilitating teaching and learning across STEM fields. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(3).

Grubbs, M., & Strimel, G. (2015). Engineering design: The great integrator. Journal of STEM teacher Education, 50(1), 8.

Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048280

Hafiz, N. R. M., & Ayop, S. K. (2019). Engineering design process in STEM education: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5), 618–639. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i5/5998

Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2010). Cooperative Problem Solving in Physics A User ’ s Manual Can this be true ? University of Minnesota, 310.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.

Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffi, P. (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7

Hidayat, S. R., Setyadin, A. H., Hermawan, H., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., Siahaan, P., & Samsudin, A. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen tes keterampilan pemecahan masalah pada materi getaran, gelombang, dan bunyi. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03206

Hung, W. (2012). Problem-based learning: A learning environment for enhancing learning transfer. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 137 ,27-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ace.20042

Jolly, A. (2016). STEM by design: Strategies and activities for grades 4-8 (1st ed.). Routledge.

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 1-20.

Lemke, C. (2002). enGauge 21st century skills: Digital literacies for a digital age. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, 3(1), 1–32.

Malik, A, & Ubaidillah, M. (2020). Students critical-creative thinking skill: A multivariate analysis of experiments and gender. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8(S), 49-58.

Malik, A., Ubaidillah, M., Fatmawati, S., Aswirna, P., Qaddafi, M., & Sutarno, S. (2021). Collaborative skills of prospective teachers in laboratory activities related to the concept of elasticity. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1731, No. 1, p. 012073). IOP Publishing.

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable†in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215

Mohiddin, D. P. (2016). Pengaruh model pembelajaran konstruktivisme dan kemampuan awal terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMK Negeri 1 Gorontalo. Jtech, 4(1), 1–5.

Mustofa, M. H., & Rusdiana, D. (2016). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada pembelajaran gerak lurus. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 02(2), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.02203

Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan keterampilan abad ke-21 dalam pembelajaran kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1).

Sya’roni, I., Putri, M. A. N., & Devianti, W. (2021). Analisis respon siswa terhadap pembelajaran fisika materi gerak melingkar menggunakan alat peraga rotating wheels berbasis arduino. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (SNF), 5, 1–7.

Syukri, M., Soewarno, S., Halim, L., & Mohtar, L. E. (2018). The impact of engineering design process in teaching and learning to enhance students’ science problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.12297

Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 10113.

Tayal, S., & Gupta, V. (2013). A survey of attacks on manet routing protocols. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(6), 2280-2285.

Tohir, M., & Ibrahimy, U. (2020). Hasil PISA Indonesia tahun 2018 turun dibanding tahun 2015. (December 2019), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8Q9VY

Vandeleur, S. (2001). Indicators of creativity in a technology class: a case study. South African Journal of Education, 21(4), 268–273.

Winarno, N. (2020). the steps of the engineering design process (EDP) in science education: a systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.766201

Zhou, N., Pereira, N. L., George, T. T., Alperovich, J., Booth, J., Chandrasegaran, S., … Ramani, K. (2017). The influence of toy design activities on middle school students’ understanding of the engineering design processes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(5), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9693-1




DOI: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v11i2.11760

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains indexed by:

       

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Stat Counter (Link)

Â