The Analysis of Creativity and Misconceptions of Elementary School Student Teachers in Science Learning through the Mind Map in Virtual Classrooms
(1) IAIN Palangka Raya
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstract
This research aimed at assessing the student teachers’ creativity and detecting their misconceptions about the material of Organism Reproduction. This descriptive research involved a total of 28 students of MI/elementary school student teachers. The Mind Map was used as a tool to assess the students' creativity and misconceptions. The data were then analyzed descriptively with scoring techniques based on the Creative Mind Map Rubric. The creativity assessment was categorized into four aspects including fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Of these four aspects, the highest level of achievement was on the fluency aspect (60.72%). Meanwhile, the lowest level of achievement was on the originality aspect (3.57%). The category of students’ creativity was “Almost Not Creative†with the percentage of 39.29%. It means that on average each student only acquired one to two aspects of creativity. The students’ misconceptions were detected almost in each sub material of Organism Reproduction. However the highest number of misconceptions was found in the material of Animal Reproduction, 21 times on the generative reproduction of vertebrates and invertebraes animals. This study provided an evaluation of alternative instruments to measure the students’ creativity and misconceptions in science learning.
Keywords: mind map, creativity, misconception, virtual classrooms.
Â
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai kreativitas mahasiswa calon guru dan mendeteksi miskonsepsi mereka pada materi Perkembangbiakan Makhluk Hidup. Penelitian deskriptif ini melibatkan 28 orang mahasiswa calon guru MI/SD. Mind map digunakan sebagai alat untuk menilai kreativitas dan miskonsepsi mahasiswa. Data kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif dengan teknik penskoran berdasarkan creative mind map rubric. Penilaian kreativitas dibagi menjadi empat aspek, yaitu fluency, flexibility, originality dan elaboration. Dari keempat aspek tersebut fluency memiliki tingkat ketercapaian yang paling tinggi (60,72%). Sementara itu, aspek terendah adalah originality (3,57%). Tingkat kreativitas mahasiswa berada pada kategori “almost not creative†dengan persentase 39,29%. Ini berarti bahwa rata-rata setiap mahasiswa hanya menguasai satu hingga dua aspek kreativitas. Miskonsepsi mahasiswa terdeteksi hampir di setiap sub materi Perkembangbiakan Makhluk Hidup. Namun demikian, jumlah miskonsepsi tertinggi ditemukan pada sub materi Perkembangbiakan Hewan, yaitu sebanyak 21 kali pada konsep perkembangbiakan generatif mengenai hewan vertebrata dan invertebrata. Penelitian ini memberikan alternatif instrumen evaluasi yang mampu mengukur kreativitas serta miskonspsi mahasiswa pada pembelajaran IPA.
Kata kunci: mind map, kreativitas, miskonsepsi, kelas virtual.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alomari, A. M. (2019). Using mind mapping technique to improve reading comprehension ability of fourth grade arabic language students in Jordan. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume, 24(1), 53–58. doi: 10.9790/0837-2401015358.
Al-Shagran, A., & Sahraoui, A.-E.-K. (2017). Assessment of e-learning systems: A systems engineering approach system. International Journal of Computer Science and Software Engineering, 6(8), 173–179. Retrieved from https://hal.laas.fr/hal-01704393.
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (Second). San Francisco: Jossery-Base Inc.
Bothma, C., & Cant, M. (2011). Adopting learning technologies: From belief to practice. Educational Studies, 37(4), 375–389. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2010.511697.
Buzan, T. (2008). The ultimate book of mind maps. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Cant, M. C., & Bothma, C. H. (2010). The learning-technology conundrum: Lecturers’ perspectives. Progressio, 32(1), 55–73.
Chick, R. C., Clifton, G. T., Peace, K. M., Propper, B. W., Hale, D. F., Alseidi, A. A., & Vreeland, T. J. (2020). Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(4), 729–732. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.018.
Choudhari, S., & Desai, P. (2017). Application of ‘mind mapping’ as a teaching-learning & assessment tool in health professions education. Journal of Health Sciences Education, 4(1), 33–36.
Cojocariu, V.-M., Lazar, I., Nedeff, V., & Lazar, G. (2014). SWOT analysis of e-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(0), 1999–2003. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.510.
Croasdell, D., Freeman, L., & Urbaczewski, A. (2003). Concept maps for teaching and assessment. Communications of AIS, 12(0), 396–405. doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.01224.
Darsono, M. (2016). Penerapan model mind mapping untuk meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar IPA. Pancasakti Science Education Journal, 1(1), 68–77. doi: 10.24905/psej.v1i1.491.
Desstya, A., Prasetyo, Z. K., Suyanta, Susila, I., & Irwanto. (2019). Developing an instrument to detect science misconception of an elementary school teacher. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 201–218. doi: 10.29333/iji.2019.12313a.
Fardiansyah, E. (2015). Pengaruh penggunaan teknik mind map terhadap pemahaman konsep siswa pada mata pelajaran IPA di Kelas V MIN 16 Cipayung (Thesis, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah). UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta. Retrieved from http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/28460.
Fatmawati, B. (2014). Identifikasi berpikir kreatif mahasiswa melalui metode mind mapping. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(2), 1–4. doi: 10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v7i2.2924.
Fauziah, U. N. E., Suryani, L., & Syahrizal, T. (2019). Penerapan google classroom dalam pembelajaran bahasa inggris kepada guru-guru bahasa inggris SMP di Subang. Abdimas Siliwangi, 2(2), 183–191. doi: 10.22460/as.v2i2p183-191.3281.
Fonseca, K. A. B., & Peralta, F. S. (2019). Google classroom: An effective virtual platform to teach writing in an EFL composition course. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 27–35. doi: 10.5430/ijelt.v6n1p27.
Galvin, E., Simmie, G. M., & O’Grady, A. (2015). Identification of misconceptions in the teaching of biology: A pedagogical cycle of recognition, reduction and removal. Higher Education of Social Science, 8(2), 1–8. doi: 10.3968/6519.
Garrick, R., Romanowski, C., & Slifka, M. (2012). Using mind mapping to influence creativity and innovation. Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration. Presented at the Orlando. Orlando: American Society for Engineering Education.
Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2019). Are teachers’ ratings of students’ creativity related to students’ divergent thinking? A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100583. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100583.
Gunawan, F. I., & Sunarman, S. G. (2018). Pengembangan kelas virtual dengan google classroom dalam keterampilan pemecahan masalah (problem solving) topik vektor pada siswa SMK untuk mendukung pembelajaran. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Etnomatnesia, 340–348. Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa: Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa.
Hairy, M. R., Kusmiyati, K., & Yamin, M. (2018). Analisis penguasaan konsep materi sistem reproduksipada siswa SMA Negeri di Kota Mataram. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 13(2), 119–123. doi: 10.29303/jpm.v13i2.749.
Hajiriah, T. L., Mursali, S., & Dharmawibawa, I. D. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal miskonsepsi pada mata pelajaran biologi. Bioscientist : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 7(2), 97–104. doi: 10.33394/bjib.v7i2.2356.
Hasyim, W., Suwono, H., & Susilo, H. (2018). Three-tier test to identify students’ misconception of human reproduction system. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(2), 48–54. doi: 10.17977/jps.v6i2.11684.
Hermansyah, D., & Witarsa, R. (2017). Influence of use of mind mapping method by teachers on teaching preparation in basic school in subject of materials teaching eyes lesson science natural science (IPA). PrimaryEdu - Journal of Primary Education, 1(1), 37–52. doi: 10.22460/pej.v1i1.423.
Huang, P.-S., Peng, S.-L., Chen, H.-C., Tseng, L.-C., & Hsu, L.-C. (2017). The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001.
Intany, N. (2016). Pembelajaran kontekstual disertai peta konsep untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir analitis siswa SMP pada Materi pencemaran lingkungan. Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang.
Jr, J. C., Harewood, K., Nna, V., Ebeigbe, A. B., & Nwokocha, C. R. (2021). Covid and the virtual classroom: the new normal? Journal of African Association of Physiological Sciences, 9(1), 1–9. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jaaps/article/view/211802
Karran, T. (2004). On-line assessment for e-learning: Options and opportunities. In eReflections—Ten years of Educational Technology Studies at the University of Oulu (pp. 127-152.). Oulu: Oulu University Press. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/222568/_On-line_Assessment_for_E-Learning_Options_and_Opportunities_.
Kedaj, P., PavlÃÄek, J., & HanzlÃk, P. (2014). Effective mind maps in e-learning. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 3(3), 239–250. doi: 10.18267/j.aip.51.
Kulsum, N. U. (2018). Application learning model mind mapping for increase the creativity and learning outcomes. Classroom Action Research Journal (CARJO), 1(4), 186–191. doi: 10.17977/um013v1i42017p186.
La Vecchia, L., & Pedroni, M. (2007). Concept maps as a learning assessment tool. Informing Science and Information Technology, 4, 307–312. doi: 10.28945/3106.
Laksana, D. N. L. (2016). Miskonsepsi dalam materi IPA Sekolah Dasar. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(2), 166–175. doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i2.8588.
Liu, H.-Y., Chang, C.-C., Wang, I.-T., & Chao, S.-Y. (2020). The association between creativity, creative components of personality, and innovation among Taiwanese nursing students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100629. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100629.
Liu, Y., Zhao, G., Ma, G., & Bo, Y. (2014). The effect of mind mapping on teaching and learning: A meta-analysis. Standard Journal of Education and Essay, 2(1), 17–31. Retrieved from http://standresjournals.org/journals/SJERE/index.html.
Maskiewicz, A. C., & Lineback, J. E. (2013). Misconceptions are “so yesterday!†CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 352–356. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-01-0014.
Mena, M., & Isaias, P. (2019). Gathering researchers’ requirements to develop a learning technologies dashboard. 51–59. doi: 10.33965/is2019_201905L007.
Miranti, M. G., & Wilujeng, B. Y. (2017). Creative thinking skills enhancement using mind mapping. 1st International Conference on Social, Applied Science and Technology in Home Economics (ICONHOMECS 2017), 112, 39–42. Atlantis Press.
Muhidin, A. (2018). Miskonsepsi buku IPA SD kelas enam di Kota Bandung pada materi perkembangbiakan tumbuhan (PhD Thesis). Universitas Terbuka.
Nikmah, I. L. (2017). Test instruments development of mathematical creative thinking ability in quadrilaterals materials for the seventh grade students. Proceedings of ADVED 2017, 200–207. Istanbul Turkey.
Nurlaila, L. (2016). Using digital technology to asses student mind mapping. Prosiding Seminar Nasional II Tahun 2016, 0. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang. Retrieved from http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/research-report/article/view/630.
O’Connor, R. (2011). The use of mind maps as an assessment tool. International Conference on Engaging Pedagogy 2011 (ICEP11) NCI, Dublin, Ireland, 1–14.
Purwanti, E., Prihanta, W., Muizzudin, & Permana, F. H. (2018). Penerapan (STAD) dipadu mind mapping berbasis lesson study untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan pemahaman konsep. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 4(1), 26–34. doi: 10.22219/jinop.v4i1.4955.
Putra, K., & Nurdiniah, D. (2015). Model pembelajaran DRM (discovery learning, reciprocal teaching, dan mind mapping) dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar biologi siswa di kelas XI. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA Dan Lingkungan Hidup. Presented at the Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA dan Lingkungan Hidup, Universitas Pakuan.
Putra, P. C., & Pratitis, N. T. (2014). Hubungan antara keterbukaan terhadap pengalaman dan efikasi diri dengan kreativitas. Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 3(03), 195–204. doi: 10.30996/persona.v3i03.409.
Putri, L. O. L. (2016). Mind map sebagai model pembelajaran menilai penguasaan konsep dan alat evaluasi menilai kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Isu-Isu Kontemporer Sains, Lingkungan, Dan Inovasi Pembelajarannya, 629–634. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Retrieved from http://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/7980.
Rahayu, P., Susantini, E., & Oka, D. N. (2018). Development of creative mind map rubric to assess creative thinking skills in biology for the concept of environmental change. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 5(2), 230–236. Retrieved from http://www.ijires.org/index.php/issues?view=publication&task=show&id=378.
Rai, A. K., & Kumar, S. (2019). Misconceptions in science: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 6(6), 543–551. Retrieved from http://www.jetir.org/archive?v=6&i=6&j=June%202019.
Ratna, F., & Afidah, M. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar dan miskonsepsi siswa pada pokok bahasan kultur jaringan tumbuhan di kelas XI IPA SMA As-Shofa Pekanbaru TA 2018/2019. Bio-Lectura, 7(1), 89–102. doi: 10.31849/bl.v7i1.4015.
Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Rolahnoviza, G. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada mata pelajaran IPA di SMPN 4 Penukal Utara Kabupaten Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir Pendopo (Diploma, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang). UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, Palembang. Retrieved from http://perpus.radenfatah.ac.id.
Sabran, & Sabara, E. (2019). Keefektifan Google Classroom sebagai media pembelajaran. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Makassar, 122–125. Universitas Negeri Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Safitri, D. (2016). The implementation of mind mapping method to increase learning interest and outcomes in science subject for 5th grader. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3, 193–203.
Samiha, Y. T., Agusta, E., & Rolahnoviza, G. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada mata pelajaran IPA di SMPN 4 Penukal Utara Kabupaten Penukal Abab Lematang Ilir Pendopo. Bioilmi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 3(1), 38–46. doi: 10.19109/bioilmi.v3i1.1338.
Sartono, E. K. E., Soleha, S., & Sukowati. (2021). The Effectiveness of Kahoot! Based on Local Wisdom to Improve Creative Thinking Skill and the Spirit of Nationality of Students in Islamic Elementary School. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 8(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.24235/AL.IBTIDA.SNJ.V8I1.7092
Stoyanov, S., & Kirchner, P. (2004). Expert concept mapping method for defining the characteristics of adaptive E-learning: ALFANET project case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 41–54. doi: 10.1007/BF02504838.
Sucahyanti, K. N., Adnyana, I. B., & Santiasa, I. M. P. A. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen mind mapping untuk menilai pemahaman konsep biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Undiksha, 5(2), 113–122. doi: 10.23887/jjpb.v5i2.21963.g13575.
Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Stokhof, H., De Vries, B., Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2020). Using mind maps to make student questioning effective: Learning outcomes of a principle-based scenario for teacher guidance. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 203-225.
Tran, T. B. L., Ho, T. N., Mackenzie, S. V., & Le, L. K. (2017). Developing assessment criteria of a lesson for creativity to promote teaching for creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 10–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.006.
Umek, L., KeržiÄ, D., Aristovnik, A., & TomaževiÄ, N. (2015). Analysis of selected aspects of students’ performance and satisfaction in a moodle-based e-learning system environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1495–1505. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1408a.
Uriyaha, N. C., & Nurimanb, F. S. H. (2018). Analisis miskonsepsi materi cara perkembangbiakan tumbuhan menggunakan certainty of response index (cri) pada siswa kelas VI SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 148–157. doi: 10.26555/jpsd.
Vijayakumari, K., & Kavithamole, G. (2014). Mind mapping: A tool for mathematical creativity. Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2(1), 241–246. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/6828928/Mind_Mapping_A_tool_for_Mathematical_Creativity.
Wang, W.-C., Lee, C.-C., & Chu, Y.-C. (2010). A brief review on developing creative thinking in young children by mind mapping. International Business Research, 3(3), 233. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v3n3p233
Warjuni. (2013). Penerapan mind map pada materi hewan untuk meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa di kelas X SMAN 9 Sendawar Kabupaten Kutai Barat. Universitas Sanata Darma, Yogyakarta.
Wette, R. (2017). Using mind maps to reveal and develop genre knowledge in a graduate writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 58–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.005.
Wicaksono, V. D., & Rachmadyanti, P. (2017). Pembelajaran blended learning melalui google classroom di sekolah dasar. Pendidikan Arah Pengembangan Profesi Guru Dan Perkembangan Pendidikan Indonesia, 513–521. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta: Prodi PGSD FKIP UMS.
Wijayanti, A., Fajriyah, K., & Suyitno, S. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi sains calon guru SD Menggunakan tes berbasis certainty of response index (CRI). Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 485–500.
Yates, T. B., & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: A study of factors contributing to high school biology students’ acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(1), 7. doi: 10.1186/s12052-014-0007-2.
DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v9i1.8010
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AL IBTIDA Journal Indexed By:
 
 
 
 2.png)
 
 
 Â
Â
 Â
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Â
Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Published by Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon In Collaboration with Perkumpulan Dosen Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (PD PGMI) Indonesia.
Editorial Office:
FITK Building, 5th Floor, Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132 Phone. 0231-481264, Fax. 0231-489926, Email: alibtida@syekhnurjati.ac.id/ alibtida2@gmail.com