Epistemic Agency in Multimodal Reading: How Primary Learners Construct Knowledge Across Modes
(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(3) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(4) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstract
Reading literacy remains a persistent challenge in many English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. However, primary EFL learners frequently encounter difficulties in integrating linguistic, visual, spatial, and gestural modalities. This study investigates how primary learners exercise epistemic agency in multimodal reading and construct knowledge across different modes. Utilizing multimodality theory and epistemic agency, the study implemented an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design involving thirty fifth-grade students from Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri (MIN) 1 Tulang Bawang Barat, Lampung. In Phase 1, a one-group pretest–posttest design measured changes in multimodal comprehension using a validated twenty-item instrument. Results showed significant improvement, with mean scores rising from 61.40 (SD = 8.25) to 74.30 (SD = 7.80), t(29) = 8.52, p < 0.001, and Cohen’s d = 1.56, indicating a large effect. In Phase 2, six students representing varied improvement levels were interviewed and engaged in task-based reflections. Thematic analysis identified five dimensions of epistemic agency: taking initiative, decision-making across modes, justification of understanding, reflection and self-regulation, and collaboration and dialogue. The integration of both phases demonstrated that learners' agentive engagement with multimodal resources underpinned comprehension gains, transforming affordances into strategies for meaning-making. These findings affirm that multimodal pedagogy fosters not only measurable comprehension outcomes but also autonomy, critical thinking, and collaborative engagement. The study recommends embedding multimodal literacy into EFL curricula and providing scaffolds that balance cognitive support with opportunities for agency.
Keywords: epistemic agency, knowledge construction, literacy pedagogy, multimodal reading, primary school.
Abstrak
Literasi membaca tetap menjadi tantangan yang terus-menerus dalam banyak konteks Bahasa Inggris sebagai Bahasa Asing (EFL). Namun, pembelajar EFL tingkat dasar sering menghadapi kesulitan dalam mengintegrasikan modalitas linguistik, visual, spasial, dan gestural. Studi ini menyelidiki bagaimana pembelajar primer menjalankan agensi epistemik dalam membaca multimodal dan membangun pengetahuan di berbagai moda. Dengan memanfaatkan teori multimodalitas dan agensi epistemik, penelitian ini menerapkan desain metode campuran sekuensial eksplanatif yang melibatkan tiga puluh siswa kelas lima dari Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri (MIN) 1 Tulang Bawang Barat, Lampung. Pada Fase 1, desain pretes-postes satu kelompok mengukur perubahan dalam pemahaman multimodal menggunakan instrumen dua puluh item yang tervalidasi. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan yang signifikan, dengan skor rata-rata meningkat dari 61,40 (SD = 8,25) menjadi 74,30 (SD = 7,80), t(29) = 8,52, p < 0,001, dan Cohen's d = 1,56, yang menunjukkan efek yang besar. Pada Fase 2, enam siswa yang mewakili berbagai tingkat peningkatan diwawancarai dan dilibatkan dalam refleksi berbasis tugas. Analisis tematik mengidentifikasi lima dimensi agensi epistemik: mengambil inisiatif, pengambilan keputusan lintas moda, pembenaran pemahaman, refleksi dan pengaturan diri, serta kolaborasi dan dialog. Integrasi kedua fase menunjukkan bahwa keterlibatan agen pembelajar dengan sumber daya multimoda mendukung perolehan pemahaman, mengubah affordance menjadi strategi untuk pembuatan makna. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa pedagogi multimoda tidak hanya mendorong hasil pemahaman yang terukur tetapi juga otonomi, pemikiran kritis, dan keterlibatan kolaboratif. Studi ini merekomendasikan penanaman literasi multimodal ke dalam kurikulum EFL dan menyediakan perancah yang menyeimbangkan dukungan kognitif dengan peluang untuk agensi.
Kata kunci: agensi epistemik, konstruksi pengetahuan, pedagogi literasi, membaca multimodal, sekolah dasar.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
AlAli, R., & Wardat, Y. (2024). Low PISA performance students: Factors, perceptions, and improvement strategies. International Journal of Religion, 5(9), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.61707/nve8gj33
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2020). Making Sense: Reference, Agency, and Structure in a Grammar of Multimodal Meaning. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459645
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2023). Revisiting mixed methods research designs twenty years later. Handbook of Mixed Methods Research Designs, 1(1), 21–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529614572.n6
Daulay, E., & Dewi, U. (2025). Reading Comprehension through Multimodal Literacy Approach for English Education. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 16(2), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.26877/a5zsp527
Eriksson, I., & Lindberg, V. (2016). Enriching ‘learning activity’with “epistemic practices”–enhancing students’ epistemic agency and authority. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(1), 32432. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.32432
Fälth, L., Brkovic, I., Kerestes, G., Svensson, I., Hjelmquist, E., & Tjus, T. (2023). The effects of a multimodal intervention on the reading skills of struggling students: An exploration across countries. Reading Psychology, 44(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2141399
Hardison, D. M., & Pennington, M. C. (2021). Multimodal second-language communication: Research findings and pedagogical implications. Relc Journal, 52(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220966635
Januarty, R., & Nima, H. N. A. (2018). Energizing Students’ Reading Comprehension through Multimodal Texts. International Journal of Language Education, 2(2), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i2.4347
Jewitt, C. (2014). 12. Multimodal approaches. Interactions, Images and Texts: A Reader in Multimodality, 11, 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781614511175.127
Kim, J., Yu, S., Lee, S.-S., & Detrick, R. (2025). Students’ prompt patterns and its effects in AI-assisted academic writing: Focusing on students’ level of AI literacy. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2025.2456043
Mahapoonyanont, N., & Songsang, N. (2024). Policy learning and adaptation: Lessons from PISA for educational reform worldwide. International Journal of Stress Management, 31(4), 26–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14179522
Martin, D. (2020). Providing Students with multimodal feedback experiences. Journal of Curriculum, Teaching, Learning and Leadership in Education, 5(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.32873/uno.dc.ctlle.05.01.1082
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Based principles for designing multimedia instruction. Copyright and Other Legal Notices, 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760
Mills, C. B. (2016). The Effect of Digital Media on Emergent Literacy Skills: A Systematic Review. http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.071
Norman, A. (2023). Educational technology for reading instruction in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 11(3), e3423. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3423
Rappa, N. A., & Tang, K.-S. (2018). Integrating disciplinary-specific genre structure in discourse strategies to support disciplinary literacy. Linguistics and Education, 43, 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.12.003
Rohi, M. P., & Nurhayati, L. (2024). Multimodal learning strategies in secondary EFL education: Insights from teachers. Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26546
Santoso, W., & Mangkuluhur, B. D. (2024). Pre-Service English Teachers’ Perceptions Towards The Use of Dialogical Learning as Reflective Practice: A Case Study. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 5(2), 493–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.35961/salee.v5i2.1401
Van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258
Vaughn, M., Jang, B. G., Sotirovska, V., & Cooper-Novack, G. (2020). Student agency in literacy: A systematic review of the literature. Reading Psychology, 41(7), 712–734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1783142
Wallen, N. E., & Fraenkel, J. R. (2013). Experimental Research. In Educational Research (pp. 279–306). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601001
Wan, S. W.-Y. (2017). Differentiated instruction: Are Hong Kong in-service teachers ready? Teachers and Teaching, 23(3), 284–311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1204289
Weninger, C. (2023). Digital literacy as ideological practice. Elt Journal, 77(2), 197–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccad001
White, J. P. (2024). Unlocking Potential With Multimodal Learning and Assessment: A Discussion of the Barriers and Benefits. GILE Journal of Skills Development, 4(2), 106–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2024.v4.i2.pp106-111
Yang, Y. (2019). Reflective assessment for epistemic agency of academically low‐achieving students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(4), 459–475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12343
Yi, Q., Dong, Z., & Qiao, H. (2024). Enhancing EFL listening and speaking skills: Strategies and practice for implementing multimedia and multi-modal approaches. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 8(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.09.032
Yi, Q., Zhao, K., & Qiao, H. (2024). The Dynamics of Multi-modal Practice and Pedagogy in EFL Instruction: A Theoretical Exploration. The Educational Review, USA, 8(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.09.011
Zhang, J., Tian, Y., Yuan, G., & Tao, D. (2022). Epistemic agency for costructuring expansive knowledge‐building practices. Science Education, 106(4), 890–923. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21717
DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v12i2.22155
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Indexed by:
Editorial Office:
FITK Building, 5th Floor, Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132. Phone. 0231-481264, Fax. 0231-489926, Email: alibtida@syekhnurjati.ac.id
Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


















