Project-based Authentic Assessment Needs Analysis for Teachers in Primary Schools

Yuyun Dwi Haryanti(1*), Sapriya Sapriya(2), Anggy Giri Prawiyogi(3), Ahmad Rifqy Ash-Shiddiqy(4), Raden Sudarwo(5),


(1) Universitas Majalengka
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
(4) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(5) Universitas Terbuka
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Abstract

Learning and assessment are an inseparable whole. Assessment, if designed appropriately, thoroughly and used appropriately in assessment procedures, can contribute to effective learning and have an impact on the competence of quality students. This study aims to analyze the need for project-based authentic assessment of teachers in elementary schools. This research includes descriptive qualitative research on elementary school teachers in Banjarnegara Regency, Central Java. Data was collected through literature studies of reputable international articles indexed by Scopus and field studies through questionnaires distributed to 103 elementary school teachers, interviews, and documentation studies of 10 elementary school teachers. Data analysis using the Miles and Huberman model includes: data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. The results of the study showed that the majority of teachers' assessments focused on the knowledge aspect using a multiple-choice test, the attitude aspect using observation, and the skill aspect using project assessment. Due to a lack of references, teachers struggle to develop assessment instruments and thus lack a clear rubric. The conclusion of this study is that teachers have difficulty implementing project-based authentic assessments so they need a practical authentic assessment companion book.

Keywords: authentic assessments, project-based, primary school teacher.

Abstrak

Pembelajaran dan penilaian menjadi satu kesatuan yang tidak dapat dipisahkan. Penilaian bila dirancang dengan tepat, menyeluruh dan digunakan secara tepat dalam prosedur penilaian dapat berkontribusi pada pembelajaran yang efektif serta berdampak pada kompetensi peserta didik yang berkualitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebutuhan penilaian autentik berbasis proyek terhadap guru di sekolah dasar. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian kualitatif deskriptif terhadap guru Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Banjarnegara, Jawa Tengah. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi literatur artikel internasional bereputasi terindeks scopus dan studi lapangan melalui kuesioner yang dibagikan terhadap 103 guru SD, wawancara, dan studi dokumentasi terhadap 10 guru SD. Analisis data menggunakan model Miles dan Huberman meliputi: pengumpulan data, reduksi data, penyajian data, dan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk penilaian mayoritas guru pada aspek pengetahuan menggunakan tes pilihan ganda, aspek sikap dengan menggunakan observasi, dan aspek keterampilan diukur dengan penilaian proyek. Guru kesulitan dalam mengembangan instrumen penilaian sehingga tidak memiliki rubrik yang jelas diakibatkan kurangnya referensi. Simpulan penelitian ini bahwa guru kesulitan menerapkan penilaian autentik berbasis proyek sehingga membutuhkan buku pendamping penilaian autentik yang praktis.

Kata kunci: penilaian autentik, berbasis proyek, guru sekolah dasar.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, Y. (2016). Revitalisasi Penilaian Pembelajaran: dalam Konteks Pendidikan Multiliterasi Abad Ke 21. Refika Aditama.

Agustina, D. A., & Wahyuni, S. (2024). Development of authentic assessment instruments on mathematics story questions at SMP IT Insan Mulia Batanghari. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3024(1), 50005. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0204661

Ahmad, S., Sultana, N., & Jamil, S. (2020). Behaviorism vs Constructivism: A Paradigm Shift from Traditional to Alternative Assessment Techniques Sadia Jamil. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(2), 19–33.

Akbar, A. (2021). Pentingnya Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 2(1), 23–30. http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/45362

Aziz, M. N. A., Yusoff, N. M., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2020). Challenges in using authentic assessment in 21st-century ESL classrooms. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 759–768. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20546

Baroroh, U., & Hamani, T. (2019). Development of Authentic Assessment in Islamic Religious Education In Elementary School. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(3), 940–955.

Barrientos Hernán, E. J., López-Pastor, V. M., Lorente-Catalán, E., & Kirk, D. (2023). Challenges with using formative and authentic assessment in physical education teaching from experienced teachers’ perspectives. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 14(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2022.2060118

Bolat, Y., & Karakuş, M. (2017). Design implementation and authentic assessment of a unit according to a concept-based interdisciplinary approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131885

Clark, N., & Hsu, J. L. (2023). Insight from Biology Program Learning Outcomes: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. CBE Life Sciences Education, 22(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-09-0177

Cresswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Damayanti, R. S., Suyatna, A., Warsono, W., & Rosidin, U. (2017). Development of Authentic Assessment instruments for Critical Thinking skills in Global Warming with a Scientific Approach. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 289. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16730

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Davy Tsz Kit, N. G., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(February), 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054

Dawson, P., Carless, D., & Lee, P. P. W. (2021). Authentic feedback: supporting learners to engage in disciplinary feedback practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1769022

Fitriati, F., Marlaini, M., & Elizar, E. (2021). Integrating rich task into the mathematics classroom to develop students’ higher order thinking skills: A collaborative action research study in a secondary school. Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 479–494. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.042

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (7th Edition). Longman Publishing.

Gulkers, J. ., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). 2004 5 Frameworks for Authentic Assessment. 52(3), 67–86.

Haryanti, Y. D., Permana, J., & Syaodih, E. W. (2023). Strengthening Elementary Teacher of Social Studies Learning through Authentic Assessment : A Literature Review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(4), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.1

Haryanti, Y. D., Sapriya, & Pambudhi, T. (2021). Pengembangan Model Penilaian Autentik Pada Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v6i1. 2272 p-ISSN:

Haryanti, Y. D., & Saputra, D. S. (2019). Instrumen Penilaian Berpikir Kreatif Pada Pendidikan Abad 21. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v5i2.1350

Henry, S. M., & Fernandez, L. C. (2019). Authentic Assessment in the Listening Comprehension Classroom: Benefits and Implications. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 19(19), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.704

Hoddin, M. S. (2023). Inovasi Pengembangan Penilaian Autentik Aspek Keterampilan di SMA Nazhatut Thullab. Al-Allam Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 38–57.

Ibrahim, A., & Nashir, I. M. (2022). Trends and patterns of needs assessments in technical and vocational education: A thematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21940

Kawuryan, S. P., Hastuti, W. S., & Supartinah. (2018). The Influence of Traditional Games-Based and Scientific Approach-Oriented Thematic Learning Model toward Creative Thinking Ability. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(1), 71–84.

Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: The use of “Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning†to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 875–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.751963

Kemendikbud. (2016). PERMENDIKBUD no.23 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Penilaian. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Permendikbud Nomor 21 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pada Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, (2022).

Koh, K., Burke, L. E. C. A., Luke, A., Gong, W., & Tan, C. (2018). Developing the assessment literacy of teachers in Chinese language classrooms: A focus on assessment task design. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816684366

Koh, K., & Luke, A. (2009). Authentic and conventional assessment in Singapore schools: an empirical study of teacher assignments and student work. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319703

Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of Cognitive, Skill-Based, and Affective Theories of Learning Outcomes to New Methods of Training Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311

Manurung, S., Sijabat, O. P., Sidabutar, R., & ... (2022). OPS Development of Authentic Assessment Instruments Based on Character Education in Elementary School. International Journal of …. http://lamintang.org/journal/index.php/ij-humass/article/view/296

Maznah, R., Hussain, R., Khamis, K., & Saadi, A. (2019). Students As Designers of E-Book for Authentic Assessment. 16(1), 23–48.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. In SAGE. SAGE Publications Inc.

Moon, T. R., Brighton, C. M., Callahan, C. M., & Robinson, A. (2005). Development of Authentic Assessments for the Middle School Classroom. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, XVI(2/3), pp. 119–133.

Mopara, R., & Sanrattana, W. (2023). Developing Teachers to Develop Students’ 21st Century Skills. World Journal of Education, 13(3), 94. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v13n3p94

Mueller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox, Enhancing Student Learning Through Online. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–7.

Munandar, A., Maryani, E., Rohmat, D., & Ruhimat, M. (2020). Establishing the professionalism of geography teachers through authentic assessment field study. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13254a

Munandar, H., & Junita, S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Psikomotorik Berbasis Peer Assessment Pada Kegiatan Praktikum Ipa. Jurnal Tunas Bangsa, 7(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.46244/tunasbangsa.v7i2.1127

Nupus, H., Triyogo, A., & Valen, A. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Buku Pendamping Tematik Terpadu Berbasis Kontekstual pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3279–3289.

Okoye, M. D. (2014). Authentic Assessment and Evaluation: Paramount Means for the Maximization of Teaching and Learning. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(7), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n7p31

Ozan, C. (2019). The effect of authentic assessment on academic achievement and attitude towards educational measurement and opinions of prospective teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18564

Palm, T. (2008). Performance Assessment and Authentic Assessment: A Conceptual Analysis of the Literature. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 13(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7275/0qpc-ws45

Pantiwati, Y., & Nyono, N. (2020). Asesmen Autentik dalam Kegiatan Praktik Pembelajaran sains. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi V 2019, 385–392.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nomor 21 Tahun 2022. (2022). Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. In kemdikbud.go.id. https://www.gurusumedang.com/2022/06/standar-penilaian-pendidikan.html

Putri, S. A., & Fathoni, A. (2022). Penyusunan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Te matik dengan Pendekatan Terpadu di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5898–5909. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3163

Rizavega, I. H. (2018). Authentic Assessment Based on Curriculum 2013 Carried by EFL Teacher. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 3(2), 197–204.

Sabtiawan, W. B., Yuanita, L., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2019). Effectiveness of Authentic Assessment: Performances, Attitudes, and Prohibitive Factors. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 156–175. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused10272a

Şahin, Ş., & Kılıç, A. (2023). Effectiveness of the project-based 6E learning model Project-Based 6E Learning Model. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 25(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2023-0003

Singh, C. K. S., Muhammad, M. M., Mostafa, N. A., Noordin, N., Darmi, R., Yunus, M. M., Kiong, T. T., & Singh, T. S. M. (2022). Challenges and Needs of ESL Teachers in Implementing Portfolio Assessment as Alternative Assessment in Teaching English. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(3), 710–723. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i3.18955

Stefani, S., Elva, N., & Sumiati, C. (2021). Peningkatan Proses Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu dengan Menggunakan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Berbasis TPACK di Kelas V SDN 07 Pandam Gadang. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(2), 3255–3260. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v5i2.1379

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Alfabeta.

Sundari, A., Fauzia, F. I., & Rustini, T. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Pada Buku Tema 1 ASEAN Untuk Siswa Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar. DIRASAH, 6(1), 104–112.

Syaifuddin, M. (2020). Implementation of authentic assessment on mathematics teaching: Study on junior high school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1491–1502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1491

T.R. Moon et al. (2005). Development of Authentic Assessment for the Middle School Classroom. Journal of Advanced Academics, 16(2–3), pp. 119–133.

Villarroel, V., Boud, D., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., & Bruna, C. (2019). Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1564882

Wahyuni, L., & Ruhimat, M. (2018). Pengembangan Model Penilaian Projek untuk Mengukur Aspek Psikomotor pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 27(1), 76–86.

Wildan, W. (2017). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Aspek Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Keterampilan Di Sekolah Atau Madrasah. Jurnal Tatsqif, 15(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v15i2.3

Worapun, W., Khamdit, S., & Siridhrungsri, P. (2022). Teacher Perceptions Toward Professional Learning Community on the Development of Thai Students' 21st Century Skills. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i1.19485

Wulandari, R., Widiatsih, A., & Kustiyowati, K. (2021). Penilaian Autentik Melalui Literasi Digital Menggunakan Google Classroom Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Di Sd Negeri Sidomulyo O5 Silo Kabupaten Jember. Journal of Education Technology and Innovation, 4(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.31537/jeti.v3i1.594

Yudha, R. P., Anggara, D. S., & Zulaeha, O. (2019). Authentic assessment instruments for performance in mathematics learning in elementary schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032012

Zaim, M., Refnaldi, & Arsyad, S. (2020). Authentic assessment for speaking skills: Problem and solution for English secondary school teachers in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13340a




DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v11i1.16982

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

AL IBTIDA Journal Indexed By:

        

 

  

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

 

Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Published by Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon In Collaboration with Perkumpulan Dosen Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (PD PGMI) Indonesia.

Editorial Office:

FITK Building, 5th Floor, Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon.  Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132 Phone. 0231-481264, Fax. 0231-489926, Email: alibtida@syekhnurjati.ac.id/ alibtida2@gmail.com

Â