Assessing the Character of Pancasila Student Profiles: Challenges Encountered by Teachers
(1) IKIP Siliwangi
(2) IKIP Siliwangi
(3) IKIP Siliwangi
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstract
Administering assessment is essential in education, including, in the implementation of character building in the Pancasila Student Profiles. This study was conducted to examine the implementation of the P5 (the Project for Strengthening Pancasila Student Profiles) in primary schools and the challenges teachers encountered in assessing the P5 character. Descriptive analysis was used in this study. Data collection was carried out using questionnaires and interviews given to 160 teachers representing 160 schools in 16 sub-districts in West Bandung, Indonesia. The results of the data analysis show that several elements are dominantly used from each dimension. Particularly noteworthy is that the creativity dimension is rarely taught. In terms of assessments, summative assessment is the most frequently practiced assessment among teachers. The number of teachers who carried out diagnostic and formative assessments is relatively small (<5%). Furthermore, the challenges or difficulties faced by the teachers in preparing the assessment encompass aspects such as the P5 comprehension, how to cultivate the P5 character, the main obstacles in instilling the P5 character, and measuring the P5 character.
Keywords: character education, assessment, primary teachers, Project to Strengthen the Pancasila Student Profiles (P5), Merdeka curriculum.
Â
Abstrak
Pelaksanaan kegiatan asesmen di sekolah merupakan suatu hal yang penting untuk dilakukan. Begitupun halnya pada pelaksanaan pembelajaran karakter Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk memberikan gambaran pelaksanaan asesmen dalam Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila di sekolah dasar dan kesulitan apa saja yang dihadapi guru dalam mempersiapkan dan melaksanakannya. Analisis deskriptif digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan angket dan wawancara yang diberikan kepada 160 guru terbaik yang mewakili 160 sekolah di 16 kecamatan di kabupaten Bandung Barat, Indonesia. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa dari setiap elemen terdapat beberapa elemen yang dominan digunakan; hal yang paling mencolok adalah adanya salah satu dimensi yang tingkat pengajarannya masih rendah yaitu kreativitas. Kemudian dalam pelaksanaan penilaian, kegiatan yang paling sering dilakukan guru adalah penilaian sumatif. Jumlah guru yang melaksanakan penilaian diagnostik dan formatif masih sedikit (<5%). Selanjutnya kesulitan yang dihadapi guru dalam mempersiapkan evaluasi itu sendiri terbagi dalam beberapa kategori, seperti pemahaman P5, cara menumbuhkan karakter P5, kendala utama dalam menanamkan karakter P5 dan mengukur karakter P5.
Kata kunci: pendidikan karakter, asesmen, guru sekolah dasar, projek penguatan profil pelajar pancasila (P5), kurikulum merdeka.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amirtharaj, S., Chandrasekaran, G., Thirumoorthy, K., & Muneeswaran, K. (2021). A Systematic Approach for Assessment of Attainment in Outcome-Based Education. Higher Education for the Future, 9(1), 8-29.
Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring Formative Assessment in Primary School Classrooms: Developinga Framework of Actions and Strategies. Educ Asse Eval Acc, 26(1), 153–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4
Boston, C. (2002). The Concept of Formative Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 9, 1-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.7275/kmcq-dj31
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational Research (4th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and Conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1025-1035.
Evans, D. J., Zeun, P., & Stanier, R. A. (2014). Motivating Student Learning Using a Formative Assessment Journey. Journal of Anatomy, 224(1), 296-303.
Gallo, A. M., & Patton, K. (2006). Assessment Benefits and Barriers: What Are You Committed To? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 77(8), 46-50. doi:doi: 10.1080/07303084.2006.10597926
Handayani, N., Ahmad, S., & Indrawati, W. (2023). Curriculum Management in Elementary Schools Based on Character Education. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 2(1), 35-45.
Harlen, W., & Deakin, C. R. (2002). A Systematic Review of the Impact of Summative Assessment and Tests on Students' Motivation for Learning (EPPI-Centre Review, Version 1.1*). Institute of Education, Social Science Research Unit. London: EPPI-Center.
Harrison, W. C., Taft, K. A., Greene, C. J., Bartlett, M. E., McDevitt, W., Kenan, R., . . . Harris, S. E. (2009). North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process. North Carolina: Public School of North Carolina.
Jennifer, G. (2013). Assessment for Learning: A Wider (Classroom-Researched) Perspective is Important for Formative Assessment and Self-Directed Learning in General Practice. Education for Primary Care, 24(2), 93–96. doi:doi:10.1080/14739879.2013.11493462
Kibble, J. D. (2017). Best Practices in Summative Assessment. Adv Physiol Educ, 41(1), 110-119. doi:doi:10.1152/advan.00116.2016.1101043-4046/17
Kobsiripat, W. (2015). Effect of the Media to Promote the Scratch Programming Capabilities Creativity of Elementary School Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 174(1), 227-232.
Lambert, D., & Lines, D. (2000). Understanding Assessment. New York: Routledge.
Leighton, J. P., & Gierl, M. J. (2007). Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Education. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Lickona, T. (2003). Character Matters: How to Help Our Children Develop Good Judgement, Integrity, and Other Essential Virtues. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Menéndez, I. Y., Napa, M. A., Moreira, M. L., & Zambrano, G. G. (2019). The Importance of Formative Assessment in The Learning Teaching Process. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 238-249. doi:https://doi.org/10.29332/i
Milles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. USA: Sage.
Nada, H. N., Fajarningsih, R. U., & Aspirin, O. P. (2021). Environmental Education to Build School Members’ Character. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 7(1), 43-52.
Nucci, L. P., & Narvaez, D. (2008). Handbook of moral and character education. New York: Routledge.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Rachman, A., Kawakip, A. N., Fadhillah, S. N., & Zulkifli. (2023). Building Religious Character of Students in Madrasah Through Moral Learning. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 78-94.
Rosala, D., & Budiman, A. (2020). Local wisdom-based dance learning: Teaching characters to children through movements. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(3), 304-326.
Runco, M. A., Acar, S., & Cayirdag, N. (2017). A Closer Look at the Creativity Gap and Why Students are Less Creative at School than Outside of School. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24(1), 242-249.
Ruqoyyah, S., H. S. P. Arga., & Wulandari, M. A. (2021). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Video Youtube dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 10(3), 542-556.
Rushton, A. (2005). Formative Assessment: A Key to Deep Learning? Medical Teacher, 27(6), 509–513. doi:doi:10.1080/01421590500129159
Rusnaini, R. S., & Noventari, W. (2021). Intensifikasi Profil Pelajar Pancasila dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ketahanan Pribadi Siswa. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 27(2), 230-249.
Sarwadi, & & Nashihin, H. (2023). Character Education Between the Western Context and Islamic perspective. Al Hikmah: Journal of Education, 4(1), 1-12.
Satria, R., Adiprima, P., Wulan, K. S., & Harjatanaya, T. Y. (2022). Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jakarta: Dalam Panduan Pengembangan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila.
Senen, A., Wulandari, M., & Muyassaroh, I. (2020, November). The Evaluation of Strengthening Character Education Program to Enhance Primary Students’ Nationalism. In The Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Social Science and Education, ICSSED 2020, August 4-5 2020, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Singh, B. (2019). Character Education in The 21st Century. Journal of Social Studies, 15(1), 1-12.
Susilo, M. J., Dewantoro, M. H., & Yuningsih, &. (2002). Character Education Trend in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning, 16(2), 180-188.
Sutinah, C. W., A. Widodo., M. Muslim., & E. Syaodih. (2023). Sustainable Awareness About Climate Change on Elementary School Pupils’ Perspective: What Wonderful Finding! Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 10(1), 53-62.
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions About the Quality of Work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481.
Treagust, D. F. (2012). Diagnostic Assessment in Science as a Means to Improving Teaching, Learning and Retention. Proceedings of the Assessment in Science Teaching and Learning Symposium (2006). David Treagust.
Vercellotti, M. L. (2021). Beyond the Rubric: Classroom Assessment Tools and Assessment Practice. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 25(3), 1-16.
Widiastuti, A., & Indriana, A. F. (2019). Analisis Pendekatan STEM untuk Mengatasi Rendahnya Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Materi Peluang. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 403-416.
Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising Teachers’ Assessment Literacies in An Era of Curriculum and Assessment Reform. Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 241–256.
Wulandari, M. A., Z. L. Farihah., A. Samsudin., & U. Kuswendi. (2022). Instill character education during online learning with developing whiteboard animation proclamation-based. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(2), 149-158.
Yang, H., & Cheng, H. (2010). Creativity of Student Information System Projects: From the Perspective of Network Embeddedness. Computers & Education, 54(1), 209-221.
Yıldız, D. N., & Gökçakan, Y. (2013). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının fen öğretimi öz-yeterlik inançları ve fen öğretimine yönelik tutumları. [Classroom teacher candidates' self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes towards science teaching.]. Journal of the Institute of Social Science, 21(1), 267-280.
DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v10i2.14963
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AL IBTIDA Journal Indexed By:
 
 
 
 2.png)
 
 
 Â
Â
 Â
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Â
Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Published by Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon In Collaboration with Perkumpulan Dosen Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (PD PGMI) Indonesia.
Editorial Office:
FITK Building, 5th Floor, Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132 Phone. 0231-481264, Fax. 0231-489926, Email: alibtida@syekhnurjati.ac.id/ alibtida2@gmail.com