MENAKAR KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR TINGKAT TINGGI CALON GURU MATEMATIKA MELALUI LEVEL HOTS MARZANO
(1) STAIN Gajah Putih Takengon
(2) STAIN Gajah Putih
(3) STAIN Gajah Putih Takengon
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This paper aims to measure students' high-level thinking skills through the level of pre-service mathematics teachers. The author used the Marzano HOTS level which is divided into five dimensions of thinking ability; (1) decision making, (2) problem solving, (3) error analysis, (4) abstraction, and (5) perspective analysis and classification. The instrument used was adapted from Marzano Rubrics for Specific Tasks or Situations (1993). This research is a quantitative research that involved 53 students of the Mathematics Education Department, STAIN Gajah Putih. The results of the study indicate that the ability to think on high-level of the pre-service teacher is at the moderate and low levels.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. 2010. Kerangka Landasan untuk Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baswedan, A. 2014. Gawat Darurat Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Creswell, John W. 2010. Rancangan Penelitian Metode Campuran Modern. Pustaka Pelajar.
Gradini, E dan Firmansyah, F. 2018. Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Budaya Lokal untuk meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa. Laporan Penelitian Kompetitif BOPTN. Unpublished. Takengon: STAIN Gajah Putih
Heong, Y.,Othman, W., Yunos, J., et all. The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skill among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Science and Humanity, Vol 1, No 2, July 2011
King, F.J., Goodson, L., and Rohani, F. (1998) Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Definitions, Strategies, and Assessment. URL: http://www.cala.fsu.edu/files/higher_order_ thinking_skills.pdf.
Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice 4
Kruger, K. (2013) Higher-Order Thinking. Hidden Sparks, Inc. New York, New York.
Anderson, L., and Krathwohl, D. (eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman Publishing Co., New York, New York.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. 1999. Innovative Tasks to Improve Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. Developing Mathematical reasoning in Grades K-12, 138-145.
Marzano,RJ. D. J. Pickering, D. E. Arredondo, G. J. Blackburn, R. S Brandt, C. A. Moffett, D. E. Paynter, J. E. Pollock, and J. S. Whisler, “Dimension of Learning Trainer’s Manual,†2nd Ed, Aurora, Colorado: McREL, 1997
Marzano, R. (2000). Designing Effective Projects: Thinking Skills Frameworks Marzano ’ s New Taxonomy
Marzano ’ s New Taxonomy. Physicist. Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/research/ designing effective-projects-thinking-skills-frameworks-marzano-s-new- taxonomy-marzano-s-new-taxonomy/
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. The new taxonomy of educational objectives 2nd Ed (Vol.2nd).doi:10.1207/s15430421 tip4104
Torres-Velasquez, D., & Lobo, G. (2004). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching and English language learners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11, 249-255.
DOI: 10.24235/eduma.v7i2.3357
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 380 timesPDF - 239 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching