Didactic Reduction of Scientific Concepts Using Cirebon Batik as a Context-Based Learning Approach

Indah Rizki Anugrah(1*),


(1) UIN SSC
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Chemistry education often faces challenges in engaging high school students due to the complexity of the subject matter. This study proposes a context-based approach, utilizing the rich cultural heritage of Cirebon Batik, to enhance students' understanding of chemistry concepts. By integrating local wisdom into the curriculum, the study aims to bridge the gap between abstract scientific knowledge and real-world applications. The research employs the Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER) to analyze the scientific content within batik-making and implement didactic reduction strategies to simplify complex concepts. The study found that by removing complex elements, utilizing visualizations, and employing analogies, the scientific content could be made more accessible to high school students. The results of this study suggest that a context-based approach, combined with didactic reduction, can significantly improve students' understanding and appreciation of chemistry.


Keywords


Chemistry education, batik, didactial-reduction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anugrah, I. R. (2021). Scientific content analysis of batik Cirebon and its potential for high school STEM-approached project-based instruction. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1806, No. 1, p. 012215). IOP Publishing.

Anwar, S. (2010). Reduksi-didaktik dalam pengajaran sains: Menyederhanakan konsep-konsep kimia untuk pemahaman siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 3(2), 44-57.

Arifin, Z. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran: Prinsip, teknik, dan prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Barnett, M., & Hodson, D. (2016). Context-based science teaching: Using real-world situations to promote engagement and understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(4), 551-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21379

Batik Cirebon. (2013, February 09). Retrieved February 15, 2019, from https://fitinline.com/article/read/batik-cirebon/

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2019). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (2nd ed.). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/6160

Carter, A. B., Radu, L., & Neill, K. (2020). Redox reactions in secondary school chemistry: Challenges and strategies for understanding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 875-883. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00253A

Chakraborty, J. N. (2015). Dyeing with solubilised vat dye. In Fundamentals and Practices in Colouration of Textiles (pp. 147-154). WPI Publishing.

Chamberlain, L., & Niven, P. (2021). The cultural context in science education: Bridging indigenous knowledge and scientific understanding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(3), 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09802-1

Clarke, G. F., & Sowerby, P. D. (2016). Fundamentals of organic chemistry in textile coloration. Textile Research Journal, 86(12), 1311-1325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517516635206

Duit, R., Höschele, I., & Kattmann, U. (2012). Models of educational reconstruction: Linking science education and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2111-2130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.661356

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2018). Science education and the cultural context: Teaching science with a focus on cultural relevance. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 539-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1430633

Mason, L. (2018). The role of analogies in teaching complex scientific concepts: Implications for science education. Science Education Review, 17(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.25124/ser.v17i1.1309

Niebert, K., & Gropengiesser, H. (2015). Scientific literacy through context-based learning: A theoretical framework for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 577-601. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1004170

Palincsar, A. S. (2019). Guided inquiry and learning in science: Bridging theory and practice. Journal of Learning Sciences, 28(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1596741

Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. W. (2021). Context-based chemistry education: A focus on relevance. Science Education International, 32(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i1.22-31

Przybylla, M., & Romeike, R. (2016). Key concepts of educational reconstruction for teaching computer science in schools. Informatics in Education, 15(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2016.15

Swan, M., Golding, C., & Deane, P. (2020). Visualizing chemistry: Using diagrams and models to enhance understanding of abstract scientific concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10098-4

Tímár-Balázsy, Ã., & Eastop, D. D. (2021). Chemical principles in textile conservation (2nd ed.). Oxford: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003145414


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Research and Practice of Educational Chemistry

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.