Multimodalitas sebagai Perspektif Baru Pembelajaran Pragmatik Edukasional: Persepsi Urgensi Inklusinya (Multimodality as a New Perspective of Educational Pragmatic Learning: Perception of the Urgency of Inclusion)

R. Kunjana Rahardi(1*),


(1) (Scopus ID: 57211394211) Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to describe the perception of the urgency of the components of socio-semiotic multimodality to be included in educational pragmatic learning. The theory that underlies this research is the social semiotic theory of M.A.K. Halliday. Data in the form of perceptions of aspects of social-semiotic multimodality were collected through a questionnaire. The collected data are identified, classified, and typified. The results showed that students' understanding of multimodality in the design of multimodality-based educational pragmatic learning models: was 72%, the existence of modality linguistic aspects at 52%, the inclusion of visual aspects at 68%, aural aspects in determining speech intent at 100%, the inclusion of sound aspects in determining speech intent 48 %, inclusion of gestural aspects 56%, spatial aspects required in the design of learning models 100%. 

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan persepsi urgensi komponen-komponen multimodalitas sosial-semiotik dimasukkan dalam pembelajaran pragmatik edukasional. Teori yang mendasari penelitian ini adalah teori semiotika sosial M.A.K. Halliday. Data berupa persepsi aspek-aspek multimodalitas sosial-semiotik yang dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner. Data yang terkumpul diidentifikasi, diklasifikasi, dan ditipifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman mahasiswa ihwal multimodalitas dalam desain model pembelajaran pragmatik edukasional berbasis multimodalitas: 72%, eksistensi aspek linguistik modalitas 52%, inklusi aspek visual 68%, aspek aural dalam penentuan maksud tuturan 100%, inklusi aspek suara dalam penentuan maksud tuturan 48%, inklusi aspek gestural 56%, aspek spasial diperlukan dalam desain model pembelajaran 100%


Keywords


educational pragmatics; multimodal perspective; social semiotics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Fajri, T. A. (2018). Pentingnya Penggunaan Pendekatan Multimodal Dalam Pembelajaran. Waskita: Jurnal Pendidikan Nilai dan Pembangun Karakter, 2(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.waskita.2018.002.01.5

Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Su, Y. (2021). The Effect of Learning Environment on the Selection of Conventional Expressions on an Aural Multiple-Choice DCT. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 25(1), 1-27.

Budhwar, K. (2017). The Role of Technology in Education. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2(8), 55-57.

Chen, J. (2017). Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 530-533, https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2016.1204903

Daryanto, S. (2018). Dampak Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Terhadap Budaya (Impact of Information Technology Development and Communication on Culture). SIMBOLIKA, 4(1), 62-72.

Ekin, M. T. Y. & Damar, E. A. (2013). Pragmatic Awareness of EFL Teacher Trainees and Their Reflections on Pragmatic Practices. International Association of Research in Foreign Language Education and Applied Linguistics ELT Research Journal, 2(4), 176-190.

Ganapathy, M. & Seetharam, S. A/P. (2016). The Effects of Using Multimodal Approaches in Meaning Making of 21st Century Literacy Texts Among ESL Students in a Private School in Malaysia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 143-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.2p.143

Goldin-Meadow, S. & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language Annu Rev Psychol, 64, 257–283. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143802

Gomez-Laich, M. P. (2016). Second language learners’ divergence from target language pragmatic norms. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching (SSLLT), 6(2), 249-269. DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.2.4 http://www.ssllt.amu.edu.pl

Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean : explorations in the development of language. In Explorations in language study. London, UK: Edward Arnold, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-443701-2.50025-1

Halliday, M. A. K. (2015). Language as social semiotic. In Soziosemiotik. Grundlagentexte. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(81)90015-4

Ikhsan, M. K. (2016). Gestures Used By The Students In Group Presentation Activity In Speaking Class. Tell-Us Journal, 2(2), 85-94.

Jaszczolt, K. M. (2018). Pragmatics and philosophy: In search of a paradigm. Intercultural Pragmatics, 15 (2), 131-159, https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0002

Locher, M. A. (2013). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics,47(1):128-130, doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002

Maddux, H. C. & Donnett, D. (2015). John Dewey’s Pragmatism: Implications for Reflection in Service-Learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Spring, 64-73.

Mey, J. L. (2012). Anticipatory pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics. 44 (2012)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.020

Muzammil, L. & Salwa. (2016). Multimodalitas Dalam Pembelajaran Speaking Bagi Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Inspiraasi Pendidikan, 6(1), 809-818.

Mondada, L. (2018). Greetings as a device to find out and establish the language of service encounters in multilingual settings. Journal of Pragmatics. Volume 120, pp 88-100https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.09.003

Olivier, L. (2021). Multimodal Composition Pedagogy in Higher Education: A Paradigm Shift. Per Linguam, 37(2):13-31 http://dx.doi.org/10.5785/37-2-996

Orsini-Jones, M. E., Lloyd, E., Cribb, M., Lee, F., Bescond, G., Ennagadi, A., & García, B. I. (2017). The Trouble with Cyberpragmatics. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 59–75, https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.2017010104

Pranowo. (2018). Integrating Intralingual and Extralingual Cotext in Educational Pragmatic Learning. In KnE Social Sciences, Vol. 3, Issue 9, Serial Publication. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i9.2615

Rahardi, K. (2016). Personal and Communal Assumptions to Determine Pragmatic Meanings of Phatic Functions. Lingua Cultura, 10(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v10i2.897

Rahardi, R. K. (2017). Pragmatic Phenomena Constellation in Specific Culture Dimension Language Study. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010109

Rai, P. C. & Lama, R. (2020). Pragmatism And Its Contribution to Education. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 8(3), 1844-1847.

Sari, Y. (2018). Multimodalitas dalam Gambar Iklan Luwak White Koffie Versi Lee Min-Hoâ€. Metalingua: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, 15(2), 235. https://doi.org/10.26499/metalingua.v15i2.73

Suweta, I. M. (2013). Ecolinguistics Approach in Preservation Rare Plants Growing in Bali. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(1) 283, doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v5i1.3311

Williams, M. K. (2017). John Dewey in the 21st Century. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 9(1), 91-102.

Wilson, N. (2017). Linguistic ethnography. In The Routledge Handbook of Language in the Workplace, 258–271. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315690001

Wimberley, E. T. (2017). Ecopragmatics. In Ecopragmatics, https://doi.org/10.18848/978-1-61229-613-5/cgp




DOI: 10.24235/ileal.v7i2.10018

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Indonesian Language Education and Literature

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ILEaL Indexed by:

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lihat Statistik Jurnal

View MyStat

Gedung Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati
Jalan Perjuangan By Pass Sunyaragi Cirebon 45132, Telp. 089667890219
Email: literatureindonesian@gmail.com

 

Â