Analisis Soal Ujian Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Arab Kelas 12 di Madrasah Aliyyah

Iza Zainal Ambiya(1*), Sopwan Mulyawan(2), Hasan Saefuloh(3),


(1) 
(2) 
(3) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Item analysis is a tool to find out whether the question is sufficient with a good question category or not.  In addition, the purpose of item analysis is also to help improve the test through revision or removing ineffective questions, as well as to find out diagnostic information to students whether or not they have understood the material that has been taught.  In this case, there are still a lot of student scores that are still below the KKM standard. There is no analysis of the problem so that one will not know whether the question is said to be a good question or not.  Meanwhile, the teacher only corrects right and wrong.  then not tested first for various reasons.  That's why the researcher wanted to analyze the madrasa exam questions made by the teacher himself.  In this research, the researcher uses quantitative descriptive method, which is a research that describes the data analysis in numbers. The researcher found that the relationship between questions and language skills included 2 language skills, namely: the ability to "read" 52.5% and "write" 47.5%, included in the sufficient category with a percentage of 50%.  The questions that are in accordance with the Basic Competence (KD) include 3 KD, namely KD "3.1" 57.5%.  KD “3.2” 20%, and KD “3.3” 22.5%, are in the good category with a percentage of 75%.  The quality of the exam questions from the aspect of validity and reliability. Which includes valid questions are 28 questions.  Meanwhile, 12 questions that are not valid.  The questions made by the teacher have high reliability with the number 0.711 > r table 0.254. The test items are viewed from a higher level of reasoning.  The test items showed the level of cognitive domain, C1 "remembered" got 37.5%, C2 "understood" 20%, C3 "applied" 22.5%, C4 "analyzed" 20%.  The questions that show the HOTS level are 20%, while the questions that show the LOTS level are 80%.

Keywords


item analysis, exam questions, arabic language

Full Text:

PDF

References


ʿAbās, Muhammad Khalīl waakharūna. 2014. Madkhal ila manāhiju al-bahsi fī al-tarbiyyah wa ʿilmu al-nafsi. ʿAmān: Dār al-Muyassarah lil-Nasyri wal-Tauziʾi

ʿAbīdāt, waakharūna. 2015. Al-bahsu al-ʿilmiy mafhūmuhu waadawātuhu waasālībuhu. ʿAmān: Dār al-fikri

Ainin. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Bahasa Arab. Malang: Hilal Pustaka

Al-Diyār, Abu Masʾud. 2012. Al-Qiyās wal-tasykhīṣu lizawiy suʾūbāt al-taʾalum. Kuwait: Maktabah Kuwait al-watiniyyah asnā al-nasyri.

Al-fauzān, ʿAbdu al-Rahman Ibrāhīm. 2011. Iḍaāt limuʾalimiy al-lugah al-ʿarabiyyah ligairi al-naṭiqīna bihā. Al-Riyāḍ: Al-Mamlakatu al-ʿarabiyyah al-suʾudiyyah.

ʿAli, Usāmah Zakī al-Sayyid. 2016. Al-Ikhtibārāt al-lugawiyyah muqārabah manhajiyyah tatbiqiyyah. Al-Riyāḍ: Dār wujūh lil-nasyri wal-tawziʾi

Al-Jāgub, Muhammad. 2002. Al-manhaj al-taqwim fi mihnah al-taʾlim. ʿAman: Dar wail lil-nasyri wal-tauzʾi.

Al-Khuli, Muhammad ʿAli. 2000. Al-ikhtibarat al-lugawiyyah. Ardan: Dar al-falah lil-nasyri wal-tawziʾ

Al-Syarbīnī, Zakariyā waakharūna. 2013. Manāhiju al-bahsi fī al-ʿulūmi al-tarbawiyyah wal-nafsiyyah wal-ijtimāʾiyyah. Al-Riyāḍ: Maktabah al-Syarqawi.

Anetha. L. F, Tilaar dan H. 2019. Analisis Butir Soal Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika. JP3I: Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia. 8 (1). 57-68.

Anis, Ibrāhīm waākharūna. 1979. Al-Muʾjam al-wasit. Turki: Dar Daʿwah

Dawidri, Raja Wahīd. Al-bahsu al-ʿilmi asasiyatuhu al-naẓariyatuhu wa mumarisatuhu al-ʿilmiyyah. Damaskus: Dar al-fikri

Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Analisis Butir Soal. Jakarta: Dirjen Menejamen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah..

Faridah, Ida. 2019. EVALUASI Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum Nasional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Hermawan, Acep. 2014. Metodologi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

———. 2021. Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Prinsip dan Operasional. Bandu: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Ibrāhīm, Majdī ʿAziz. 2009. Muʾjam Muṣṭālaḥāt wamafāhīmi al-taʾlim wa-taʾalum. Qahirah: ʿAlimul al-kutub.

Ibrahim, Nini dan Prima Gusti Yanti. 2017 . Bahan Ajar Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia untuk Perguruan Tinggi dan Umum. Jakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka.

Jabir, Walid Ahmad. 2002. Tadrisu al-lugah al-ʿarabiyyah mafāhīmu naẓariyyatuhu wataṭbiqāti ʿamaliyyah. ʿAman: Dar al-fikri.

Juhanda, Aa. 2016. Analisis Soal Jenjang Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Revisi pada Buku Sekolah Elektronik (BSE) Biologi SMA. Vol. 21. No. 1. 61-66.

Jumiati. 2016. IPA dan Pembelajaran Beripikir Tingkat Tinggi (telaah buku siswa MI/SD kelas VI Tema. Karya Afriki, dkk). Vol. 2. No. 1. 1-10.

Keputusan Direktur Jendral Pendidikan Islam. 2021. Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penyusunan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Di Madrasah. Jakarta: Direktur Jendral Pendidikan Islam.

Labīd, Abī. 2009. Ṭuruqu al-tadrīs waasālību al-imtihān. Pakistan: Al-jāmiʾah al-fārūqiyyah

Madkūr, ʿAli waakhrarūna. 2010. Al-marjiʾ fī manāhiji al-lugah al-ʿarabiyyah lil-nāṭiqīna bilugātin ukhra. Al-qāhirah: Dār al-fikri al-ʿaraby

Modul Penyusunan Soal. 2019. Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Bahasa dan Sastra Arab. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Muhammad, ʿĀbdu al-khāliq. 1089. Ikhtibār al-lugah. Al-riyāḍ: Jāmiʾatu al-muluk saʾūd.

Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2011. Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yoryakarta.

Purnomo, Pajar. 2019. Penilaian Pembelajaran HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill). Cilacap: Candradimuka Pers.

Purwanto. 2009. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Qāsim, Ansā Muhammad Ahmad. 2003. Al-furūqu al-fardiyyah wal-taqwīm. ʿAmān: Dār al-fikri

Qazāmil, Sūniyā Hānim ʿAli. 2013. Al-muʾjam al-ʿasriy fī al-tarbiyyah. Al-qāhirah: ʿĀlimul al-kutub

Rahayu, Sri. dkk. 2020. Pengembangan Soal High Order Thinking Skill untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Pedadidaktika: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Vol. 7. No. 2. Hal. 127-137.

Ruwaida, Hikmatu. “Proses Kognitif dalam Taksonomi Bloom Revisi: Analisis Kemampuan Mencipta (C6) pada Pembelajaran Fikih di MI Miftahul Anwar Desa Banua Lawas.” AL-Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah 4, no. 1 (2019): 51–76.

Sudjana, Nana. 2019. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Pendiidkan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Yogyakarta: Alfabeta.

Syamsudin dan Vismaia S. Damaianti. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Thoha, M. Chabib. 1991. Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Tim Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan,. 2019. Panduan Penilaian Tes Tertulis. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.

Tuʾaimah, Rusydī Ahmad. 2000. Namāzuju al-ikhtibarātu al-mawduiyyah fī al-lugah lil-marhalati al-sānawiyyah. Al-Qāhirah: Dār Al-fikri al-ʿArabiy

-------------. 2004. Tahlīl al-muhtawā fī al-ʿulūmu al-insāniyyah mafhūmuhu ususuhu asikhdāmuhu. Al-Qāhirah: Dār Al-fikri al-ʿArabiy.

Umar, Jahja. 1996. Bahasa Penataran Pengujian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Balitbang Dikbud.

Umar, Mahmūd Ahmad waakharūna. 2010. Al-Qiyās al-nafsi wal-tarbawiyyi. Aman: Dār al-muyassarah lil-nasyri wal-tawziʾi

Umar, Saifu al-islām Saʾdun. 2009. Al-muwajiz fi manhaj al-bahsi al-ilmīy fī al-tarbiyyah wal-ʿulum al-insāniyyah. Dimasyqa: Dār al-fikri




DOI: 10.24235/ibtikar.v11i1.10521

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Iza Zainal Ambiya, Sopwan Mulyawan, Hasan Saefuloh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Daftar Indeks: