AI-DRIVEN FEEDBACK IN ENGLISH WRITING ASSESSMENT: IS IT MORE EFFECTIVE THAN CONVENTIONAL FEEDBACK?

RAHMATIKA KAYYIS(1*),


(1) University of Muhammadiyah Pringsewu Lampung
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study compares the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated feedback against traditional teacher-written feedback in improving the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing of university students. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving two groups of learners (n=64) who completed pre-test and post-test writing assignments. The control group received conventional feedback from professors, while the experimental group received iterative, automated feedback from an AI tool during revision. The assignments were graded using an analytical rubric. Results indicated that both groups showed significant improvement; however, the AI-feedback group demonstrated substantially greater gains in overall writing quality, particularly in vocabulary, grammar, and textual organization. These outcomes suggest that AI-driven feedback facilitates more frequent and focused revisions, promoting greater student engagement with the writing process. The conclusion underscores the potential of AI tools to complement lecturer guidance, enhancing formative assessment practices. This integration presents significant implications for feedback design and writing pedagogy in EFL contexts.

Keywords


AI-generated feedback;EFL Writing;Formative Assessment.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alnemrat, A., et al. (2025). AI vs. teacher feedback on EFL argumentative writing. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1614673

Chen, H., & Pan, J. (2022). Computer or human: A comparative study of automated evaluation scoring and instructors’ feedback on Chinese college students’ English writing. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00171-4

Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and student perceptions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2

Fleckenstein, J., Liebenow, L. W., & Meyer, J. (2023). Automated feedback and writing: A multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students’ performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1162454. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1162454

Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024). Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students’ feedback quality and writing ability. The Internet and Higher Education, 63, 100962.

Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2022). Application of corrective feedback using emerging technologies among L2 university students. Cogent Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2132681

Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9

Polakova, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101

Rahimi, M., Fathi, J., & Zou, D. (2024). Exploring the impact of automated written corrective feedback on the academic writing skills of EFL learners: An activity theory perspective. Education and Information Technologies.

Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816

Wang, Z., & Han, F. (2022). The effects of teacher feedback and automated feedback on cognitive and psychological aspects of foreign language writing: A mixed-methods research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 909802. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909802

Wei, P., Wang, X., & Dong, H. (2023). The impact of automated writing evaluation on second language writing skills of Chinese EFL learners: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1249991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249991

Wulandari, K. (2024). Research trends in the use of automated writing evaluation tools. Lingua Pedagogia, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/lingped.v6i1.76507

Zhang, Z. (Victor), & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004




DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v10i2.23414

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

This Journal is indexed by:

 

 

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter
View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.