PEDAGOGICAL ACTION AND TECHNOLOGIES DURING ONLINE LEARNING: A CASE STUDY

Zakky Yavani

doi:10.24235/eltecho.v4i1.11318

PEDAGOGICAL ACTION AND TECHNOLOGIES DURING ONLINE LEARNING: A CASE STUDY

Zakky Yavani^(1*),

(1) IAIN Syekh Nurjati
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Technology implementation has become a norm in today's teaching and Learning, including in EFL instruction at university level. However the investigation within pedagogy and technology fusion are rare to discuss. Therefore, this research investigates a lecturer's actions and technological performance in the learning process. This research uses descriptive qualitative, using case study principles. The data was taken from vocabulary class document, an interview three students of vocabulary for academic purposes class, and online class observation field notes. they aimed to determine the performance of pedagogy and technology in online Learning. The goal is to explain the pedagogical aspects of technology implementation seen from Laurillardâ€™ persepectives (2012). It was found that pedagogical actions practiced are as follows; Narrative, interactive, adaptive, Productive, and Communicative pedagogical actions.

Keywords

technology, pedagogy, language teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmadi, D., & Reza, M. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115-125.

Ahmad, S. (2012). Pedagogical action research projects to improve the teaching skills of Egyptian EFL student teachers. Proceedings of the ICERI2012, Spain.

Azhar, K. A., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google classroom: Teachersâ€™ perceptions. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52.

Barry. (1998). A Study of Students Perception in English Classes.Vol.33 No.2.

Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teacher perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Journal of teaching and learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 198-206.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). Strip mining for gold; research and policy in educational technology-a response to foolâ€™s gold. Educational Technology Review, 11(1), 7-69.

Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Merrill

Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Methods Approches (3rd). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Dabbagh, N. & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concept, strategies, and application. Pearson education, Inc.

European Commission (2001).The e-Learning Action Plan: Designing tomorrowâ€™s education.http://www.elearningeuropa.info.

GenÃ§lter, B. (2015). How does technology affect language learning process at an early age? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199(2015), 311 â€“ 316. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.552. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283165281_How_does_Technology_Affect_Language_Learning_Process_at_an_Early_Age

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. Pearson.

Hinkelman, D. (2018). Blending technologies in second language classrooms. Springer.

Iftakhar. I. (2016). Google classroom: What works and how? Journal of Education and Social Sciences, Vol. 3, (2).

Leaver, B. L., & Willis, J. R. (Eds.). (2004). Task-based instruction in foreign language education: Practices and programs. Georgetown University Press.

Leh, A. S. (2005). Learned from service learning and reverse mentoring in faculty development: A case study in technology training. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1),25-41.

Norton, L. (2014). The case for pedagogical action research in psychology learning and teaching. Psychology Teaching Review, 20 (2).

Okojie, M. C., Olinzock, A. A., & Okojie-Boulder, T. C. (2006). The pedagogy of technology integration. Journal of technology studies, 32(2), 66-71.

Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can â€˜blended learningâ€™be redeemed?. E-learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17-26.

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational Behaviour (10th ed.). Prentice Hall

DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v4i1.11318