Lanskap Konteks Sosial-Sosietal dalam Pragmatik Berbasis Cybertexts Vaksinasi Covid-19 (Socio-Social Context Landscape in Cybertexts-Based Pragmatics Covid-19 Vaccination)

R. Kunjana Rahardi(1*),


(1) (Scopus ID: 57211394211) Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to describe the types of social-social context landscapes in cybertexts-based pragmatics related to the Covid-19 vaccination discourse. The research data is in the form of speech excerpts that contain the identity of the social-social context landscape in cybertexts. The data collection method applied is the listening method with reading and note-taking techniques. Furthermore, the data are identified, classified, and typified to apply data analysis methods and techniques. The data analysis method applied was the extra lingual equivalent method. The validity of the data used expert validation and theoretical triangulation. This study resulted in findings in the form of six types of social-social context landscapes for Covid-19 vaccination, namely (1) confirming the meaning of the speech, (2) clarifying the meaning of the speech, (3) informing the purpose of the speech, (4) setting the background for the speech, (5) supporting the meaning of the speech. the meaning of the speech, and (6) clarify the meaning of the speech.

Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan jenis-jenis lanskap konteks sosial-sosietal dalam pragmatik berbasis cybertexts terkait dengan wacana vaksinasi Covid-19. Data penelitian berupa cuplikan-cuplikan tuturan yang di dalamnya terkandung identitas lanskap konteks sosial-sosietal dalam cybertexts. Metode pengumpulan data yang diterapkan adalah metode simak dengan teknik baca dan teknik catat. Selanjutnya data diidentifikasi, diklasifikasi, dan ditipifikasi untuk dikenakan metode dan teknik analisis data. Metode analisis data yang diterapkan adalah metode padan ekstralingual. Keabsahan data menggunakan validasi pakar dan triangulasi teori. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan berupa enam jenis lanskap konteks sosial-sosietal vaksinasi Covid-19, yakni (1) menegaskan maksud tuturan, (2) mengklarifikasi maksud tuturan, (3) menginformasikan maksud tuturan, (4) melatarbelakangi maksud tuturan, (5) mendukung maksud tuturan, dan (6) memperjelas maksud tuturan.


Keywords


context landscape; social-societal context; cybertexts; cyberpragmatics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carbaugh, D., & van Over, B. (2013). Interpersonal Pragmatics and Cultural discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3565−3578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.013

Georgiadis, A., & Collado, A. (2014). "Context Analysis" in Green RFID Systems, October. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139343459.002

Goddard, C. (2009). Not Taking Yourself Too Seriously in Australian English: Semantic Explications, Cultural Scripts, Corpus Evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(1), 29−53. https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.002

Haider, I. (2019). "Assessing Interlanguage Pragmatics Through Interactive Email Communication" in Global Perspectives on Language Assessment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429437922-11

Hartanto, B. (2015). Analisis Unsur Kohesi dalam Wacana Bahasa SMS (Short Massage Service). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 1(1), 90−106.

Hay, J. (2000). Functions of Humour in The Conversations of Men and Women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(2000), 709−742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7

Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(1998), 437−455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00009-5

Ifantidou, E. (2013). Pragmatic Competence and Explicit Instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 59(A), 93−116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.008

Joseph, C. A. B. (2005). Language in Contact and Literatures in Conflict: Text, Context, and Pedagogy. World Englishes, 24(2), 131−143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2005.00398.x

Kress, G. (1990). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 84−99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001975

Leech, G. (2007). Politeness: Is There an East-West divide? In Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), 167-206. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009

Locher, M. A. (2013a). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics, 47(1), 128−130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002

Locher, M. A. (2013b). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-Mediated Communication in Context. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.002

Mahsun. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mey, J. L. (2002). Symbolic Domination and Postcolonial Contestation: Resources and Conditions. In Journal of Pragmatics, 34(3), 285−330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80003-0

Mey, J. L. (2004). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Blackwell: Oxford UK and USA Cambrige.

Orsini-Jones, M., & Lee, F. (2018). Intercultural Communicative Competence for Global Citizenship: Identifying Cyberpragmatic rules of engagement in telecollaboration. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58103-7

Pranowo, P. (2020). Perspektif Masyarakat Jawa Terhadap Pemakaian Bahasa Nonverbal: Studi Kasus Etnopragmatik. Litera, 19(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v19i1.28873

Rahardi, R. K. (2020). Pragmatik: Konteks Ekstralinguistik dalam Perspektif Cyberpragmatics. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Amara Books.

Rahardi, R. K. (2020). Building Critical Awareness of Corona Virus-related News: Cyber-pragmatic Study of COVID-19 Hoaxes on Social Media. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6), 5398−5409.

Rahardi, R. K. (2015). Menemukan Hakikat Konteks Pragmatik. Prosiding Seminar PRASASTI, 17−23. https://doi.org/10.20961/PRAS.V0I0.63.G47

Rahardi, R. K. (2020a). Ketriaditisan Konteks Pragmatik Tuturan Tidak Santun: Perspektif Kultur Spesifik. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 9(1), 106−128. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v9i1.2340

Rahardi, R. K. (2020b). Triadic Functions of Situational Context of Hate Speeches : a Cyberpragmatic Perspective. Metalingua.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (1982). Method: Design, and Procedure Approach. Tesol Quarterly, 16(2), 153−168.

Rozakis, M. (2007). The cultural context of emergencies: Seeking for a(n) holistic approach on disaster management. Disaster Prevention and Management, 16(2), 201−209. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560710739522

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sudaryanto. (2016). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (1st ed.). Sanata Dharma University Press.

Tarr, M. J., & Warren, W. H. (2002). Virtual Reality in Behavioural Neuroscience and Beyond. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1089−1092. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn948

van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics (1st ed.). USA: Routledge.

Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and Non-verbal Communication. Cambridge University Press.

Wilson, D. (2003). Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 273−291.

Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics, Internet-mediated Communication in Context (A. Fetzer (ed.); 1st ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.




DOI: 10.24235/ileal.v6i2.8112

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Indonesian Language Education and Literature

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ILEaL Indexed by:

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lihat Statistik Jurnal

View MyStat

Gedung Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati
Jalan Perjuangan By Pass Sunyaragi Cirebon 45132, Telp. 089667890219
Email: literatureindonesian@gmail.com

 

Â