Similarities and Differences of Honorific Systems Between Indonesian and Korean Languages (Perbedaan dan Persamaan Honorifik Bahasa Indonesia dan Korea)

Terry Chang(1), Yumna Rasyid(2*), Endry Boeriswati(3),


(1) Korea Culture and Study
(2) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(3) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to describe similarities and differences of honorific systems between Indonesian and Korean languages. The data analysis concludes that Indonesian people find it difficult to speak using Korean honorific systems. Moreover, the honorific systems in these two languages have a few similarities and differences in common, and the Korean has more complex honorific systems particularly the use of particles, verbs, vocabularies, and endings while the Indonesian has minimal honorific systems in the form of lexical markers. In addition, the Korean structure is more different from that of the Indonesian structure. Therefore, multiple ways are used to explore more honorific systems in the two languages.

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan persamaan dan perbedaan undak usuk dalam bahasa Indonesia dan bahasa Korea. Analisis data menyimpulkan bahwa pengguna bahasa Indonesia mengalami kesulitan ketika berbicara dengan menggunakan undak usuk bahasa Korea. Kedua bahasa ini memiliki beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan. Bahasa Korea memiliki undak usuk yang lebih kompleks. Kompleksitas dalam bahasa Korea dapat berupa penggunaan partikel, kata kerja, kosakata, dan akhiran. Adapun Bahasa Indonesia memiliki undak usuk yang minim bentuk penanda leksikal. Selain itu, struktur bahasa Korea berbeda dengan bahasa Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, berbagai cara digunakan untuk mengeksplorasi lebih banyak undak usuk dalam dua bahasa ini.


Keywords


message; drama; character; conflict; motive

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chaer, A. dan Agustina, L. (2004). Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chang, C. (2012). Belajar Bahasa Korea. Jakarta: Penerbit Liri.

Christie, C. (2015). Epilogue. Politeness Research: Sociolinguistics as Applied Pragmatics. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 355-364. doi: 10.1515/pr-2015-0014

Croker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics. A practical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Eshghinejad, S. dan Moini, M.R. (2016). Politeness Strategies Used in Text Messaging: Pragmatic Competence in an Asymmetrical Power Relation of Teacher-Student. Sage Open, January – March, doi: 10.1177/2158244016632288

Kariithi, F. (2016). Politeness Strategies Used by Youth in Their Language Use. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 21(7), 70-72.

Kim, J. A. (2015). í•œê¸€ì˜ íƒ„ìƒ. Seoul: Dolbege.

Kim, S. A. (2010). ê²½ì–´ë²•ì˜ ì‚¬ìš©ë²•. Seoul: Nowon.

Lee, J. B. (2012). 한국어 경어법과 ì‚¬ìš©ì˜ ì›ë¦¬. Seoul: Sotong.

Min, J. Y. (2010). Korean Grammar in Use: Intermediate. Seoul: Darakwon.

Sa`d, S. H. T. dan Mohammadi, M. (2016). Irian EFL Learners` Sociolinguistic Competence: Refusal Strategies in Focus. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 48-66.




DOI: 10.24235/ileal.v3i2.2470

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 502 times
PDF - 455 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Indonesian Language Education and Literature

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ILEaL Indexed by:

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lihat Statistik Jurnal

View MyStat

Gedung Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati
Jalan Perjuangan By Pass Sunyaragi Cirebon 45132, Telp. 089667890219
Email: literatureindonesian@gmail.com

 

Â