Evaluasi Pembelajaran Daring Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia Menggunakan Model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) (Evaluation of Indonesian Language Course Online Learning Using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Model)
(1) IKIP Siliwangi
(2) UNNES
(3) IKIP Siliwangi
(4) UNNES
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to describe the effectiveness of online learning in Indonesian Language Courses (MKBI). The evaluation uses the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model. This qualitative research design uses descriptive evaluative. Data collection instruments used closed questionnaires, structured interviews, and documentation. Data processing techniques refer to the Guttman scale. The results showed the average value of the context evaluation aspects (0.92), input evaluation (0.85), process evaluation (0.86), and product evaluation (0.90). So, it can be concluded that MKBI's online learning at IKIP Siliwangi is very appropriate and effective.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran daring pada Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia (MKBI). Evaluasi dilakukan dengan menggunakan model Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP). Desain penelitian kualitatif ini menggunakan deskriptif evaluatif. Instrumen pengumpulan data menggunakan angket tertutup, wawancara terstruktur, dan dokumentasi. Teknik pengolahan data merujuk pada skala Guttman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai rerata aspek evaluasi konteks (0,92), evaluasi input (0,85), evaluasi proses (0,86), dan evaluasi produk (0,90). Jadi, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pembelajaran daring MKBI di IKIP Siliwangi sudah sangat sesuai dan efektif.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdan, F. (2018). Problematika Pustakawan dalam Menulis Karya Tulis Ilmiah. Libraria , 6(1), 23-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/libraria.v6i1.2215
Abdullah, N., at. al. (2016). The Evaluation and Effectiveness of School Based Assessment Among Science Teachers in Malaysia Using CIPP Model. International Journal of advanced and applied sciences, 3(11), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2016.11.001
Agustina, N. Q., & Mukhtaruddin, F. (2019). The Cipp Model-Based Evaluation on Integrated English Learning (IEL) Program at Language Center. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v2i1.1043
Alonso, D. A., Kok, SK, & O Brien, S. (2018). Understanding approaches to innovation through the dynamic capabilities lens: A multi-country study of the wine industry. International Journal of Innovation Management .
Ariawan, P. ., Sanjaya, D. ., & Divayana, D. G. . (2016). An Evaluation of The Implementation of Practice Teaching Program for Prospective Teachers At Ganesha University Of Education Based on CIPP-forward chaining. International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence (IJARAI), 5(2), 1–5. https://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJARAI.2016.050201
Aristya, V. A. & Taryono, T. (2021). Prinsip Penting Publikasi Ilmiah dan Pencegahan Falsifikasi Fabrikasi. REFLEKSI EDUKATIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 11(2), 178-189. https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v11i2.5348
Arni, I. H., Gunawan, Fatwa, B., & Sentoso, I. (2021). Kegunaan Model CIPP dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan Inklusi. MASALIQ: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sains, 1(3), 164–175. https://doi.org/10.36088/masaliq.v1i3.60
Cahyadi, A., Hendryadi, Widyastuti, S., & Suryani. (2022). COVID-19, emergency remote teaching evaluation: the case of Indonesia. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2165–2179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10680-3.
Gunawan, H. & Hidayatullah, A. (2020). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter dan Berorientasi Kearifan Lokal. Literasi: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia serta Pembelajarannya, 4(2), 76-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/literasi.v4i2.4093
Hartini, R. A. (2018). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran di MTs Darul Ulum Kotabaru. Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v6i1.73
Hasanudin, C., Wagiran, W., & Subyantoro, S. (2021). Evaluasi Perkuliahan Daring Keterampilan Menulis selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dengan Model Evaluasi CIPP. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 8(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v8i2.1784
Hidayat, R., Asyhar, M., Suyanu, S., Nazir, Y. N., & Murahim, M. (2021). Telaah Isi dan Bahasa Buku Ajar MKWU Bahasa Indonesia Dirjen Belmawa Ristekdikti: Proyeksi Model Standar Materi Ajar MKWU Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 11(4), 447-463. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpbs.v11i4.42054
Isodarus, P. B. (2017). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Teks. Sintesis: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebudayaan, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24071/sin.v11i1.927
Lee, S. Y., Shin, J-S., & Lee, S-H. (2019). How to execute Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model in Medical Health Education. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 16(40), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3352/JEEHP.2019.16.40
Listiana, Y., Prastiwi, L., & Amrullah, I. (2021). Pendampingan Publikasi Ilmiah Bagi Mahasiswa FKIP Universitas Dr Soetomo. INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Pengabdian, 5(1), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.36841/integritas.v5i1.877
Luma, M., Tola, A., & Hadirman, H. (2020). Evaluasi Implementasi K-13 Berdasarkan Model CIPP di SDN 2 Tabongo Kabupaten Gorontalo. Jurnal Ilmiah Iqra’, 14(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.30984/jii.v14i2.1307
Magdalena, I., Hanifah, H., Agustin, J. T., & Fitriani, M. A. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Secara Daring Materi Menulis Karangan Narasi Kelas V SDN Karangharja 1. Bintang: Jurnal Pendidikandan Sains, 3(1), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.36088/bintang.v3i1.1289
Mulyaningsih, I., Suwandi, S., Setiawan, B., & Rohmadi, M. (2018). PARMI (production, attention, retention, motivation, and innovation): An alternative to improving scientific writing skills. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 317-321. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4159
Mulyaningsih, I. & Itaristanti, I. (2018). Pembelajaran Bermuatan HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) di Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Indonesia. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 4(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/ 10.24235/ileal.v4i1.2970
Nirwana, N. & Ruspa, A. R. (2020). Kemampuan Menulis Karya Tulis Ilmiah Mahasiswa Prodi Informatika Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra, 6(1), 557-566. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v6i1.277
Nurhayani, N., Yaswinda, Y., & Movitaria, M. (2021). Model Evaluasi Cipp Dalam Mengevaluasi Program Pendidikan Karakter Sebagai Fungsi Pendidikan. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(8), 2353-2362. https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v2i8.1116
Gunung, N. I., & Darma, I. K. (2019). Implementing the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model to Measure the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Teaching at Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB). International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 14(1), 33–39.
Özüdoğru, F. (2017). Evaluation of the Voluntary English Preparatory Program at a Turkish State University. Journal of International Social Research, 10(48), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1520
Prayogo, D. (2022). Evaluation of basic safety training using the CIPP model. AACL Bioflux, 15(1), 557–562.
Purwaningsih, H., & Dardjito, H. (2021). Implementation of CIPP Model for Online Learning Evaluation During Covid-19 Pandemic. Getsempena English Education Journal, 8(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v8i2.1394
Rahmawati, L. E. (2022). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Mata Kuliah Wajib Bahasa Indonesia di Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah dan ‘Aisyiah Menggunakan Model CIPP. Imajeri: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.22236/imajeri.v4i2.8763
Rahmah, N. (2013). Belajar Bermakna Ausubel. Al-Khwarizmi Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 1(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v1i1.54
Raibowo, S., & Nopiyanto, Y. E. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga & Kesehatan pada SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Mukomuko melalui Pendekatan Model Context, Input, Process & Product (CIPP). Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi, 6(2), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3881891
Ramadhani, D., Mahardika, I. M. S., & Indahwati, N. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran PJOK Berbasis Daring Terhadap Tingkat Pemahaman dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas IV-VI SD Negeri Betro, Sedati-Sidoarjo. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v7i1.1817
Rocha, A. C., Silva, M., & Duarte, C. (2022). How is sexuality education for adolescents evaluated? A systematic review based on the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model. Sex Education, 22(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1908984.
Rosyidi, R. A., Junaidi, A. R., & Sunandar, A. (2017). Implementation of Vocational Skills Program for Intellectual Disabilities : Evaluation Study with CIPP ( Context , Input , Process , Product ). Journal of ICSAR, 6(1), 83–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um005v6i12022p083
Sahla, W. A., Mukhlisah, N., Julkawait, J. & Irwansyah, R. (2019). IbM-Pelatihan Teknik Penulisan Parafrase Untuk Skripsi Mahasiswa Sebagai Upaya Menghindari Plagiarisme. Jurnal Impact: Implementation and Action, 1(2), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.31961/impact.v1i2.645
Salmiati, S. (2015). Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Parafrase Menggunakan Metode Mind Mapping. Jurnal Pelangi, 8(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.22202/jp.2015.v8i1.375
Sanusi, A., Maulana, D., & Sabarno, R. (2021). Evaluation of Students Writing Skills Using CIPP model in Arabic Learning: The Concept and its Implementation. Conference: The 4th Proceeding International Conference on Arabic Language and Literature (ICALL) 2021, Bandung, Indonesia.
Syahrir, S., Supriyati, Y., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Evaluasi Dampak Program Pendidikan Jarak Jauh (PJJ) melalui model CIPP pada Kinerja Dosen aspek Pembelajaran pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v7i1.1716
Tarmidzi, T. (2018). Belajar Bermakna (Meaningful Learning) Ausubel Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran dan Evaluasi Peta Konsep (Concept Mapping) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Pada Mata Kuliah Konsep Dasar IPA. Caruban: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 131-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/cjiipd.v1i2.2504
Tsani, I., Arsyadana, A., Sufirmansyah, & Shafira, E. (2021). Evaluasi Model CIPP Pada Pembelajaran PAI dan Budi Pekerti di SMA Negeri 7 Kota Kediri. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 17–45. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v12i1.8165
Ulya, M. (2021). Penggunaan Educandy dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Lingua Rima: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 10(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.31000/lgrm.v10i1.4089
Wardani, H. K., Darusuprapti, F., & Hajaroh, M. (2022). Model-Model Evaluasi Pendidikan Dasar (Scriven Model, Tyler Model, dan Goal Free Evaluation). JP. Pendidikan: Riset & Konseptual, 6(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.28926/riset_konseptual.v6i1.446
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84.
DOI: 10.24235/ileal.v7i2.10284
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Indonesian Language Education and Literature
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ILEaL Indexed by:
Â
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Gedung Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati
Jalan Perjuangan By Pass Sunyaragi Cirebon 45132, Telp. 089667890219
Email: literatureindonesian@gmail.com
Â
Â