PUBLICATION ETHICS

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Indonesian Journal Of Arabic Studies is a peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online and published 2 times a year. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher (IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Indonesian Journal Of Arabic Studies is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.  

IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon as the publisher of the Indonesian Journal Of Arabic Studies takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Publication decisions

The editor of the Indonesian Journal of Arabic Studies is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Process for Identification of and Dealing with Allegations of Research Misconduct

The Indonesian Journal of Arabic Studies (IJAS) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity. In cases where allegations of research misconduct arise, the journal follows a clear and transparent process to address them.

  1. Identification of Research Misconduct
    IJAS takes reasonable steps to prevent the publication of articles containing research misconduct, such as plagiarism, citation manipulation, and data falsification/fabrication. These steps include using plagiarism detection software and thorough peer reviews to ensure that all submissions are original and meet ethical standards.

  2. Handling Allegations of Misconduct
    If the journal receives any allegations related to research misconduct regarding a published article, the editorial team will promptly investigate the issue. The journal follows the guidelines set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) or similar standards to ensure a fair and impartial handling of such allegations.

  3. Investigation Process
    The publisher and editors will:

    • Review the evidence presented regarding the alleged misconduct.
    • Contact the authors involved to gather their perspective on the matter.
    • Consult with relevant experts, if necessary, to assess the nature of the misconduct.

  4. Decision and Actions
    Based on the findings of the investigation, the following actions may be taken:

    • Correction: If the misconduct is minor or an honest error, a correction or retraction may be issued.
    • Retraction: If the misconduct is serious, the article may be retracted from the journal, and the authors may be notified of the decision.
    • Further Action: In cases of severe misconduct, the journal may take further action, including banning the author from submitting future articles to the journal.

  5. Transparency and Integrity
    IJAS ensures that all allegations of research misconduct are handled with transparency and in accordance with ethical guidelines. The editorial team maintains a commitment to publishing only research that adheres to the highest ethical standards, and any findings of misconduct will be addressed promptly and professionally.

This process ensures that the integrity of the journal is upheld, and that the academic community can trust the published research in Indonesian Journal of Arabic Studies.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.