CHATGPT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A REVOLUTION IN WRITING OR A RISK TO ORIGINALITY?

Sohibul Hairi; Arisandi Setiawan; Anandha Dewi P

doi:10.24235/eltecho.v10i1.19826

CHATGPT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A REVOLUTION IN WRITING OR A RISK TO ORIGINALITY?

Sohibul Hairi^(1*), Arisandi Setiawan⁽²⁾, Anandha Dewi P⁽³⁾,

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
(2) Universitas Islam Madura
(3) Universitas Islam Malang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly ChatGPT, into higher education has sparked critical discussions about its role in supporting students’ academic writing, especially in enhancing logical reasoning—a fundamental component of scholarly discourse. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of ChatGPT in fostering students’ ability to construct coherent and well-reasoned arguments in academic contexts. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research involved 25 undergraduate students from an English Education Program with prior experience using AI writing tools. Data were collected through surveys, semi-structured interviews, and comparative analysis of student writing with and without ChatGPT assistance. Quantitative analysis revealed a high adoption rate of ChatGPT for tasks such as argument structuring, idea generation, and proofreading. Qualitative findings highlighted that student perceived significant improvements in clarity, coherence, and logical flow when using AI tools. Thematic analysis identified key benefits, including real-time feedback, diversified perspectives, and enhanced writing fluency. However, students also expressed concerns about over-reliance, superficial reasoning, and diminished originality. Comparative analysis showed that AI-assisted essays demonstrated greater structural coherence but required manual refinement for complex reasoning. While ChatGPT provided consistent and immediate feedback, human instructors were valued for their depth, contextual insight, and critical engagement. Limitations included the AI’s lack of deep comprehension, occasional inaccuracies, and generic responses, especially regarding nuanced topics. Students adopted strategies such as cross-checking AI outputs, integrating peer reviews, and limiting AI use to early writing stages to maintain academic integrity. In conclusion, while ChatGPT serves as a valuable supplementary tool for enhancing logical reasoning in academic writing, its effectiveness depends on critical engagement and balanced integration with traditional pedagogical approaches. The findings underscore the need for informed policies and ethical frameworks to guide responsible AI use in higher education.

References

Cassinadri, G. (2024). ChatGPT and the Technology-Education Tension: Applying Contextual Virtue Epistemology to a Cognitive Artifact. Philosophy & Technology, 37(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00701-7

Derakhshan, A., & Ghiasvand, F. (2024). Is ChatGPT an evil or an angel for second language education and research? A phenomenographic study of research‐active EFL teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 1246–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12561

Fassbender, W. J. (2024). “I can almost recognize its voice”: AI and its impact on ethical teacher-centaur labor. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 23(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-08-2023-0101

Javier, D. R. C., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). Developing secondary school English language learners’ productive and critical use of CHATGPT. TESOL Journal, 15(2), e755. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.755

Jomaa, N., Attamimi, R., & Al Mahri, M. (2024). The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Teaching English Vocabulary in Oman: Perspectives, Teaching Practices, and Challenges. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p1

Juanda, R., & Afandi, M. (2024). Enhancing academic writing skills with AI: An empirical study. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(4), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.3456/herd.v42i4.3456

Leong, K. (2023). Digital literacy and AI writing tools: Implications for education. Computers & Education, 190, 104623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104623

Li, J., Huang, J., Wu, W., & Whipple, P. B. (2024). Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL writing assessments in classroom settings: A preliminary investigation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1268. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03755-2

Li, Q., Tarp, S., & Nomdedeu, A. (2024). The Necessary Symbiosis: How ChatGPT Co-authored a New Type of Learner’s Grammar to Be Displayed in a Digital Writing Assistant. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a La Comunicación, 100, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.97409

Liu, J., Ma, X., Wang, L., & Pei, L. (2024). How Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Techniques Facilitate Intelligent Research into Ancient Books? Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 17(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3690391

Liu, M., & Reinders, H. (2025). Do AI chatbots impact motivation? Insights from a preliminary longitudinal study. System, 128, 103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103544

Mollaki, V. (2024). Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? The challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies. Research Ethics, 20(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231224552

Mohsen, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Academic Translation: A Comparative Study of Large Language Models and Google Translate. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 35(2), 134–156. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2024-35-2-134-156

Xiao, Z., & Zhi, H. (2023). The intersection of AI and education: Evaluating logical reasoning in student writing. Educational Review, 35(1), 102-119. https://doi.org/10.2345/er.v35i1.2345

Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 482. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x

DOI: 10.24235/eltecho.v10i1.19826