Learning Styles, Sense of Classroom Community and Student Engagement In Hybrid Learning
(1) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(2) Universitas Negeri Semarang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The aims of this study were: to analyze differences in learning outcomes, learning satisfaction, a sense of class community, and student involvement between the experimental and control classes, to analyze the effect of learning styles on learning outcomes, learning satisfaction, a sense of class community, and student involvement. This type of research is a quasi-experimental, with a population of accounting education students. The sampling technique uses purposive. Data collection techniques in the form of tests and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques in the form of prerequisite tests and hypothesis testing. The results of the study are: there is no difference in learning outcomes and learning satisfaction between hybrid and face-to-face learning, in hybrid learning there is a difference in sense of classroom community with face-to-face learning, in hybrid and face-to-face learning there is also no difference in student engagement, overall learning style. has a positive effect on learning outcomes, learning satisfaction, and sense of class community, and learning styles have no effect on student engagement
Keywords: Learning styles, Sense of Classroom Community, Students'Â engagement, Hybrid learning
Full Text:
PDF 84-98References
Abas, H. (2015). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309–319.
Alrashidi, O., Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic Engagement: An Overview of Its Definitions, Dimensions, and Major Conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9(12), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p41
Anggrawan, A. (2019). Analisis Deskriptif Hasil Belajar Pembelajaran Tatap Muka dan Pembelajaran Online Menurut Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa. MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 18(2), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v18i2.411
Anlı, G. (2019). Investigating the Relationship between Sense of Classroom Community and Interpersonal Sensitivity. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(5), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.24
Aydin, I. E., & Gumus, S. (2016). Sense of Classroom Community and Team Development. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 17(1), 60–77.
Bailey, L. M. (2020). Comparing Students’ Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in Online, Hybrid and Face to Face Education Course (Issue June).
Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012094
Baturay, M. H. (2011). Relationships among sense of classroom community, perceived cognitive learning and satisfaction of students at an e-learning course. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003644029
Berga, K. A., Vadnais, E., Nelson, J., Johnston, S., Buro, K., Hu, R., & Olaiya, B. (2021). Blended learning versus face-to-face learning in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 96(August 2020), 104622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104622
Bird, K. A., Castleman, B. L., & Lohner, G. (2022). Negative Impacts From the Shift to Online Learning During the COVID-19 Crisis: Evidence From a Statewide Community College System. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221081220
Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000228834
Erdem Aydin, I., & Gumus, S. (2016). Sense of classroom community and team development process in online learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.09900
Eryilmaz, M. (2015). The Effectiveness Of Blended Learning Environments. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 8(4), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i4.9433
Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-learning vs. Face-to-face learning: Analyzing students’ preferences and behaviors. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381
Graff, M. (2003). Individual Differences in Sense of Classroom Community in a Blended Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165032000165635
Hatami, S. (2013). Learning styles. ELT Journal, 67(4), 488–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs083
Kastornova, V. A. E., & Gerova, N. V. (2021). Use of hybrid learning in school education in France. Proceedings - 2021 1st International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning in Higher Education, TELE 2021, 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1109/TELE52840.2021.9482527
Kavrayici, C. (2021). The Relationship Between Classroom Management And Sense Of Classroom Community In Graduate Virtual Classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.906816
Kurthen, H., & Smith, G. G. (2005). Hybrid Online face-to-face teaching. International Journal of Learning, 12(5), 237–245. http://libezproxy.open.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=24978815&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Maheni, N. P. K. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Dan Lingkungan Teman Sebaya Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Di Jurusan Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, 11(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v11i1.20077
Marpaung, J. (2016). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. KOPASTA: Jurnal Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling, 2(2), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.33373/kop.v2i2.302
Meydanlioglu, A., & Arikan, F. (2014). Effect of Hybrid Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering, 8(5), 1292–1295.
Muhtadi, A. (2006). Karakteristik Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa ditinjau dari Preferensi Sensori dan Lingkungan. Jurnal TEKNODIKA, 4(7), 1–21.
Oosterheert, I. E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). Individual differences in learning to teach: Relating cognition, regulation and affect. Learning and Instruction, 11(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00019-0
Pashler, H., Mcdaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning Style: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. http://psi.sagepub.com/content/9/3/105.abstract
Price, L. (2004). Individual differences in learning: Cognitive control, cognitive style, and learning style. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000262971
Rambe, M. S., & Yarni, N. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, Dan Kinestetik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Sma Dian Andalas Padang. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(2), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v2i2.486
Razzak, F., Shaikh, S., & Siddiqui, A. (2019). Exploring Effects of Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes. New Horizons (1992-4399), 13(1), 13–30. http://10.2.36.54/NH.13.1(19).02%0Ahttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=138449750&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504946
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1
Sahin, I., & Shelley, M. (2008). Considering students’ perceptions: The distance education student satisfaction model. Educational Technology and Society, 11(3), 216–223.
Saichaie, K. (2020). Blended, Flipped, and Hybrid Learning: Definitions, Developments, and Directions. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2020(164), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20428
Shamsuddin, N., & Kaur, J. (2020). Students’ learning style and its effect on blended learning, does it matter? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20422
Suhandiah, S., Suhariadi, F., Yulianti, P., Wardani, R., & Muliatie, Y. E. (2022). Online learning satisfaction in higher education: what are the determining factors? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(2), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.35724
Xiao, J., Sun-Lin, H. Z., Lin, T. H., Li, M., Pan, Z., & Cheng, H. C. (2020). What makes learners a good fit for hybrid learning? Learning competences as predictors of experience and satisfaction in hybrid learning space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12949
Yudhira, A. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19: (Studi Komparasi Pembelajaran Luring Dan Daring Pada Mata Kuliah Pengantar Akuntansi Di Universitas Tjut Nyak Dhien). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1–10.
Zenab, A. S., & Sukawati, S. (2022). Studi Komparasi Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Metode Daring Dan Luring Pada Mata Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia. Semantik, 11(2), 245. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v11i2.p245-256
DOI: 10.24235/edueksos.v12i01.13315
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF 84-98 - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Edueksos Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.