.png)
3.png)
MAPPING THE PARADIGM OF CONTEMPORARY MAQĀṢIDĪ EXEGESIS: A Philosophical Inquiry Into The Works of Abū Zayd, Raḥmānī, and As’ad
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Contemporary tafsir studies are experiencing a paradigm shift from textuality toward maqāṣid-based contextuality. However, the methodological diversity among contemporary scholars remains philosophically unmapped. This research aims to analyze the paradigmatic construction of tafsir maqāṣidī (maqāṣid-based exegesis) through the thoughts of three key figures: Waṣfī ’Ashūr Abū Zayd, Ibrahim Raḥmānī, and ‘Alī Muḥammad As’ad. Employing a qualitative library research method with a philosophy of science approach, this study examines the ontological, epistemological, and axiological aspects of their works. The findings indicate that ontologically, the three scholars concur in positioning the Qur'an as a text embodying a dynamic intentio dei (Divine intent). Epistemologically, significant differences exist; Abū Zayd emphasizes linguistic aspects and thematic induction, whereas Raḥmānī focuses on strict legal rationale ('illat) verification. Axiologically, tafsir maqāṣidī is oriented toward grounding universal Qur'anic values that offer solutions to humanitarian problems. This study concludes that tafsir maqāṣidī offers an integrative methodology that bridges the gap between the text of revelation and contemporary reality.
Studi tafsir kontemporer mengalami pergeseran paradigma dari tekstualitas menuju kontekstualitas berbasis tujuan (maqāṣid). Namun, keragaman metodologi di kalangan sarjana kontemporer seringkali belum terpetakan secara filosofis. Penelitian ini bertujuan membedah konstruksi paradigmatik tafsir maqāṣidī melalui pemikiran tiga tokoh kunci: Waṣfī ’Ashūr Abū Zayd, Ibrahim Raḥmānī, dan ‘Alī Muḥammad As’ad. Menggunakan metode kualitatif-pustaka dengan pendekatan filsafat ilmu, penelitian ini menganalisis aspek ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi dari karya-karya tafsir mereka. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara ontologis, ketiga tokoh sepakat menempatkan Al-Qur'an sebagai teks yang memuat intentio dei (maksud Tuhan) yang dinamis. Secara epistemologis, terdapat perbedaan signifikan bahwa Abū Zayd lebih menekankan aspek linguistik, sementara Raḥmānī pada illat hukum]. Secara aksiologis, tafsir maqāṣidī berorientasi pada pembumian nilai universal Al-Qur'an yang solutif bagi problem kemanusiaan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa tafsir maqāṣidī menawarkan metodologi integratif yang menjembatani teks wahyu dan realitas kekinian.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
As‘ad, ‘Alī Muḥammad. “al-Tafsīr al-Maqāṣidī li al-Qur’ān al-Karīm.” Islāmiyyāt al-Ma‘rifah 23 (n.d.): 89–110.
Al-ʿAsqalānī, Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī ibn Ḥajar. Fatḥ al-Bārī bi Sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1379 H.
Bushiri, M. “Tafsir al-Qur’an dengan Pendekatan Maqāṣid al-Qur’an Perspektif Ṭāhā Jābir al-‘Alwānī.” Tafsere 7, no. 1 (2019): 132–149.
Dāwūd, Abū. Sunan Abī Dāwūd. Vol. 4. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī, n.d.
Duderija, Adis. Metode Pemahaman Al-Qur’an dan Hadis antara Liberal dan Salafi. Diterjemahkan oleh A. Aziz. Jakarta: Yayasan Pengkajian Hadits el-Bukhori, 2021.
El Fadl, Khaled Abou. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority, and Women. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2003.
Fawaid, Ahmad. “Maqāṣid al-Qur’an dalam Ayat Kebebasan Beragama Menurut Penafsiran Ṭāhā Jābir al-‘Alwānī.” Madania 21, no. 2 (2017): 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0066-x.
Al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. al-Mustaṣfā min ‘Ilm al-Uṣūl. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Risālah, 1997.
Hidayati, Tri Wahyuni. “Tafsir Maqāṣidī as an Alternative Approach in Interpreting the Qur’an.” Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 5, no. 2 (2020): 175–188. https://doi.org/10.18326/mlt.v5i2.3771.
Ibn ‘Āshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. Amman: Dār al-Nafā’is, 2000.
Al-Jawziyyah, Ibn Qayyim. I‘lām al-Muwaqqi‘īn ‘an Rabb al-‘Ālamīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2004.
Layish, Aharon. “The Transformation of the Sharī‘a from Jurists’ Law to Statutory Law in the Contemporary Muslim World.” Die Welt des Islams 44, no. 1 (2004): 85–113.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf. Dirāsah fī Fiqh Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah: Bayna al-Maqāṣid al-Kulliyyah wa al-Nuṣūṣ al-Juz’iyyah. Edisi ke-3. Kairo: Dār al-Shurūq, 2008.
Raḥmānī, Ilyas. Ḍawābiṭ al-I‘tibār al-Maqāṣidī fī I‘māl al-Naṣṣ al-Shar‘ī. n.p.: Sāmī li al-Nashr wa al-Ṭibā‘ah, 2019.
Al-Raysūnī, Aḥmad. al-Fikr al-Maqāṣidī: Qawā‘iduhu wa Fawā’iduhu. Casablanca: Maṭba‘at al-Najāḥ al-Jadīdah, 1999.
Al-Raysūnī, Aḥmad, dan Muḥammad Jamāl Barūt. al-Ijtihād: al-Naṣṣ, al-Maṣlaḥah wa al-Wāqi‘. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 2000.
Rifqi, Muhammad Afif, dan Ahmad Husnul Thahir. “Tafsir Maqāṣidī: Building Interpretation Paradigm Based on Maṣlaḥah.” Millah: Jurnal Studi Agama 18, no. 2 (2019): 335–356.
Zahrah, Muḥammad Abū. Tārīkh al-Madhāhib al-Islāmiyyah: fī Tārīkh al-Madhāhib al-Fiqhiyyah. Vol. 2. Kairo: Dār al-Fikr al-‘Arabī, n.d.
Al-Zarqā’, Muṣṭafā Aḥmad. al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Madārisuhu. Damaskus: Dār al-Qalam, 1995.
Zayd, Wāṣil ‘Āshūr Aḥmad. al-Tafsīr al-Maqāṣidī li Suwar al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. n.p.: n.p., 2013.
Zaydān, ‘Abd al-Karīm. al-Madkhal li Dirāsat al-Sharī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. n.p.: Dār ‘Umar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb, n.d.
Zionis, R. M. Ijtihād Maqāṣidī: Perspektif Aḥmad al-Raysūnī. n.p.: n.p., n.d.
DOI: 10.24235/diyaafkar.v13i2.23816
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.