ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA (APS) PERSPEKTIF AL-QURÃN DAN HADITS

Fuad Fatkhu Rakman; Syufa'at Syufa'at

doi:10.24235/jm.v8i1.11947

ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA (APS) PERSPEKTIF AL-QURÃN DAN HADITS

Fuad Fatkhu Rakman^(1*), Syufa'at Syufa'at⁽²⁾,

(1) UIN Prof KH Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
(2) UIN Prof KH Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to find out the basis for Alternative Dispute Resolution (APS) which includes mediation, negotiation, conciliation, and arbitration in Islamic law taken from the Al-Qur'an and Al-Hadith. The core of the problem to be uncovered in this study is to find models of dispute resolution at the time of Rasulullah SAW. The research method used in this research is a library study research model with a descriptive qualitative approach and relies on books, articles, journals, and turots as a source of research data. The results of this study found that during the time of Rasulullah SAW and his companions, the practice of resolving disputes through Alternative Dispute Resolution (APS) had been found. This is evidenced by, first, the discovery of the basis for negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration from the Al-Qur'an and Hadith, second, the prophet Muhammad SAW negotiated with Suhail Bin 'Amr as a negotiator of the polytheists in the form of a hudaibiyah agreement, the three prophets of Muhammad SAW became a mediator in reconciling two people from the Ansor who had a dispute over material rights, fourthly it was found that the Prophet Muhammad SAW justified the arbitration carried out by Abu Syuraikh and Sa'ad Bin Muadz.

Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Al-Qur'an, Al-Hadith

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Baghowi. (1991). Maâ€™alim Al-Tanzil Fi Tafsir Al-Qurâ€™An (Tafsir Al-baghowi). Daar Thoyyibah Li Al-Nasyr Wa Al-Tauziâ€™.

Al-Buthy, D. S. R. (2016). Fikhu as-Surah an-Nabawiyyah (p. 1991). Daar Al-Fikr.

Antasari, R. R., SH, M., Fauziah, M., Is, M. S., & SHI, M. H. (2020). Hukum ekonomi di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Bakhri, Syaeful., Layaman., Muh Iqbal Alfan. (2021). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Cirebon Pada Perlindungan Konsumen Financial Technology Lending. J-ISCAN: Journal of Islamic Accounting Research, 3(1), 1-22.

Eliza, pocut, Muhlizi, A., & Listyanto, A. (2017). Laporan analisis evaluasi hukum. 325.

Entriani, A. (2017). Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.21274/an.2017.3.2.277-293

Fathoni, A. (2006). Metodologi penelitian dan teknik penyusunan skripsi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hamidi, H., & Latif, M. A. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan di Wilayah Madura Secara Mediasi Oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional. YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 12(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v12i1.10546

Hibban, I. (1988). Al-Ihsan Fi Taqribi Shahih Ibnu Hibban. Muassasah Al-Risalah.

Ibn Hambal, A. (2008). Musnad Ahmad Bin Hanbal. Daar Al-Kutub Al-`Ilmiyyah.

Ibnu Katsir. (2000). Tafsir Al-Qurâ€™an Al-â€™Adzim (Tafsir Ibnu Katsir). Daar Ibn Hazm.

Kurniawaty, Y. (2017). Efektivitas Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Sengketa Kekayaan Intektual ( Alternative Dispute Resolution On Intellectual Property Dispute ). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(2), 163â€“170.

Muslim, A.-N. (2006). Shahih Muslim, Vol. 2 (p. 62). Daar Thoyyibah Li Al-Nasyr Wa Al-Tauziâ€™.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung. (2016). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9, pp. 1689â€“1699). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI. (2008). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2008 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan (Issue 2, p. 121).

Supardi, S., & Hanifiyah, Z. (2017). Penyebab Kegagalan Mediasi dalam Proses Perceraian (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Kudus periode Januari-April 2017). YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 8(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v8i1.3224

Susilawetty. (2013). Arbitrase dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa ditinjau dalam perspektif peraturan perundang-undangan. Gramata Publishing.

Susilawetty. (2014). Hukum Acara Khusus Pada Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial. Graha Ilmu.

Syafrida, & Hartati, R. (2020). Keunggulan Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Melalui Negosiasi. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan Vol. 7 No.2 Desember 2020, 7(1), 248â€“270.

Tampongangoy, G. H. (2015). Arbitrase Merupakan Upaya Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasioanal. Lex et Societatis, III(1), 140â€“150.

Triana, N. (2019). Alternative Dispute Resolution (Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Dengan Model Mediasi, Arbitrase, Negosiasi Dan Konsiliasi). Kaizen Sarana Edukasi.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. In UU No 30 1999 (pp. 41â€“51).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. In Presiden Republik Indonesia (Issue 1, pp. 1â€“103). https://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/2.pdf

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahub 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Vol. 27, Issue 7, pp. 1â€“5).

Utama, M. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Kontrak dan Arbitrase. Tunggal Mandiri.

Zuhaily, W. (1985a). Al-Fiqh Al-IslaÌ„my Wa â€˜adillatuhu Jilid 2. In Damascus: Dar Al-Fikr (Vol. 1, p. 944).

Zuhaily, W. (1985b). Al-Fiqh Al-IslaÌ„my Wa â€˜adillatuhu Jilid 8. Suriah.

DOI: 10.24235/jm.v8i1.11947