PENGGUNAAN BAHASA ILMIAH PADA PENULISAN SKRIPSI: PROBLEMATIKA DAN ALTERNATIF SOLUSINYA (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Agama Islam IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon)
(1) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Thesis is the final project of writing for students as one of the important document that represents the prestige of the institution. There are still many errors or incompatibility with the principles of the scientific diversity of languages in the thesis. Therefore, research needs to be done about it. This study aims to: 1) describe the use of scientific language on the writing of students of Department of Islamic Education IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, 2) describes the types of errors using scientific language in the thesis of the department, 3) fix the mistakes the use of scientific language, and 4) writing scientific language to describe the problems and alternative solutions. Data were taken randomly by 20% (24 thesis) of a total population of 120 thesis. The method used is descriptive qualitative. Based on the analysis of data errors, word formation found 31 errors, 61 errors word choice, sentence drafting error 62, 11 arrangement error of reasoning, and the application of rule 105 spelling errors. In addition, there are eight abstract by writing clauses ended up using the same words, but a matter of a different percentage. There are also eight title essay that begins with the word influence.
Keywords
References
Alwasilah, A. C. (2002). Pokoknya Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Merancang dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Arifin, Zaenal, Farid Hadi.2001. 1001 Kesalahan Berbahasa.Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Arikunto. S. (1991). Prosedur Penelitian. Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Applebee.AN.(1981). Writing in the Secondary School: English and the Content Areas. NCTE Research Report No. 21.
Chaer, Abdul. 2011. Ragam Bahasa Ilmiah. Jakarta : PT Asdi Mahasatya.
Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.1998. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
---------------. 2008. EYD Plus. Jakarta: Limas.
Kurniawan Irwan. 2015. EYD Ejaan yang Disempurnakan. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.
Rohmadi, Muhammad dan Aninditya Sri Nugraheni. 2011. Belajar Bahasa Indonesia: Upaya Terampil Berbicara dan Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Surakarta: Cakrawala Media..
Sabariyanto, Dirgo. 1999. Mengapa Disebut Bentuk Baku dan Tidak Baku?. Yogyakarta: Mitra Gama Widya.
……………2002. Kata-kata yang Patut Anda Pahami. Yogyakarta: Gama Media.
Sobarna, Cece. Tanpa tahun. “Bahasa sebagai Pendidikan Karakterâ€. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.
Sutikno. 2010. Pengembangan Model Sinektik pada Pembelajaran Menulis Berkonteks Multikultural dalam Pembentukan karakter siswa. UNNES: Pascasarjana.
Suyitno, Imam. 2012. Menulis Makalah dan Artikel.Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Tarigan, H.G. (1992). Menulis: sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Tiedt, I. M. (1989). Writing From Topicto Evaluation. London: Allyn and Bacon.
Tim Penyusun KBBI. 2008. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka: Jakarta.
Umaemah, A. (2010). Aplikasi Teknik Menulis Kolaboratif dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Bahasa Inggris.PTK pada IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon: tidak diterbitkan.
Wijaya, Putu. (2012). Tempo: “Karakter dalam Bahasaâ€. Jakarta: Tempo.
DOI: 10.24235/ileal.v1i1.51
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 1462 timesPDF - 724 times PDF - 672 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Indonesian Language Education and Literature
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ILEaL Indexed by:
Â
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Gedung Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Indonesia, Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati
Jalan Perjuangan By Pass Sunyaragi Cirebon 45132, Telp. 089667890219
Email: literatureindonesian@gmail.com
Â
Â