Students - Teachers Communication Patterns in Islamic Elementary Schools: Analyzing the Hierarchical Context of Standpoint’s Theory
(1) (Scopus ID:57204968031) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(2) IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to identify the patterns of student-teacher communication in learning as perceived by teachers from the perspective of Standpoint Theory. This descriptive research uses questionnaires distributed to teachers. The results of this research show that first, the most dominant attitude in student communication is the desire to always please the teacher; second, the most common language use in student communication is frequent complaints; third, the most dominant verbal communication style of students is always speaking politely; fourth, the most prevalent nonverbal communication style is frequent eye contact, active listening, and silence; and fifth, the most dominant personality attitude in student communication is a lack of willingness to make sacrifices. These findings indicate that student-teacher communication remains hierarchical. Teachers are perceived to have more power compared to students, maintaining the stigma of teachers as figures to be "obeyed and emulated." This results in students being more passive, hesitant to take initiative, dependent, and primarily focused on pleasing the teacher.
Keywords: students-teachers communication pattern, Islamic elementary school, Standpoint theory.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pola komunikasi siswa-guru dalam pembelajaran yang dipersepsi oleh guru ditinjau dari teori Standpoint. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan menggunakan kuesioner yang kepada guru. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pertama, sikap dalam berkomunikasi siswa yang paling dominan adalah selalu ingin menyenangkan guru; kedua, penggunaan bahasa dalam komunikasi siswa yang paling dominan adalah sering komplain; ketiga, gaya komunikasi verbal siswa yang paling dominan adalah selalu berbicara sopan; keempat, gaya komunikasi nonverbal siswa yang paling dominan adalah sering melakukan kontak mata, lebih banyak mendengar, dan diam; dan kelima, sikap kepribadiaan siswa dalam berkomunikasi yang paling dominan adalah jarang mau berkorban. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa komunikasi guru-siswa masih bersifat hierarkis. Guru dianggap memiliki kekuasaan lebih besar dibandingkan siswa, sehingga stigma guru masih dipertahankan sebagai figur yang harus "dipatuhi dan ditiru". Hal ini mengakibatkan siswa menjadi lebih pasif, ragu untuk mengambil inisiatif, tergantung, dan lebih berfokus untuk menyenangkan guru.
Kata kunci: pola komunikasi siswa-guru, sekolah dasar Islam, teori Standpoint.Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aspelin, J. (2012). How do relationships influence student achievement? Understanding student performance from a general, social psychological standpoint. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 22(1), 41-56.
Asrar, Z., Tariq, N., & Rashid, H. (2018). The impact of communication between teachers and students: A case study of the Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Karachi, Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, 14(16), 32-39.
Bee Bee, S. (2012). The Impact of Teachers’ Communication Skills on Teaching: Reflections of Pre-service Teachers on their Communication Strengths and Weaknesses. Humanising Language Teaching, 1. http://old.hltmag.co.uk/feb12/mart.htm
Brooks, A. (2006). Feminist Standpoint Epistemology: Building Knowledge and Empowerment Through Women’s Lived Experience. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984270
Cazan, A. M., & Anitei, M. (2010). Motivation, Learning Strategies, and Academic Adjustment. Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology, 1(1), 50–58.
Chraif, M., & Anitei, M. (2012). Attachment, Motivation, Positive and Negative Emotions and Support Groups as Predictors of Romanian Students’ Career Orientation in Psychology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2409–2413.
Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2018). Teachers’ perceived autonomy support and adaptability: An investigation employing the job demands-resources model as relevant to workplace exhaustion, disengagement, and commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 125-136.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., & Rouby, D. A. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(4), 729.
Diloyan, A. (2017). The Importance of Communication in the Classroom: The Impact of Effective Communication Skills on Student Enthusiasm. Presented to the Department of English & Communications in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts. American University of Armenia.
Duţă, N. (2015). From Theory to Practice: The Barriers to Efficient Communication in Teacher-Student Relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.116
Ehindero, O., & Ajibade, Y. (2000). What Our Student Say about How We Teach. Ife J. Educ. Studies, 7(1), 1–9.
Fenn, V. (2014). Grammar and Grammar Teaching: Changing Perspectives. Grammar and Grammar Teaching: Changing Perspectives Volume, 106.
Freire, P. (1994). From Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum Books.
Freire, P. (2011). Pendidikan yang Membebaskan Pendidikan yang Memanusiakan. Pustaka Pelajar.
Gacer, A. (2013). Lecturer-Student Communication in Blending Learning: Educational Theory and Practice. Educational Consultancy and Research Center, 13, 1.
Graddol, D. & Swann, J. (2003). Gender Voice (Translation). Pedati.
Gurtman, M. B. (2009). Exploring Personality with the Interpersonal Circumplex. Social and Personality with the Interpersonal Psychology Compass, 3(4), 601–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00172.x
Hagenauer, G., & Simone E Volet. (2014). Teacher–Student Relationship at University: An Important yet under-Researched Field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388.
Hawkesworth, M. (1992). From Objectivity to Objectification: Feminist Objections. Annals of Scholarship, 8, 451–477.
Hawkesworth, M. (1999). Analizing Blacklash: Feminist Standpoint Theory as Analytical. Women’s Studies International Forum, 22(2), 135–155.
Hietanen, J. K. (2018). Affective Eye Contact: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01587
Hughes, J. N., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reciprocal Effects of Student–Teacher and Student–Peer Relatedness: Effects on Academic Self Efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.005
Ihmeideh, F. M., Ahmad, A., & Al Dababneh, K. A. (2010). Attitude toward Communication Skills among Students’ Teachers in Jordanian. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 1–11.
Iurea, C. (2015). Classroom environment between stimulation and discouragement. teacher's contribution to creating a new socio-affective environment favoring the teacher-student communication. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 203, 367-373.
Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Conway, C. A., & Feinberg, D. R. (2006). Integrating Gaze Direction and Expression in Preferences for Attractive Faces. Psychological Science, 17(7), 588–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01749.x
Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia Ul Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its Role in the Development of the Students’ Academic Success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18–21.
Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A Taxonomy for Complementarity in Human Transactions. Psychological Review, 90(3), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.3.185
Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary Interpersonal Theory and Research. Willey.
Košir, K., & Tement, S. (2011). Teacher–Student Relationship and Academic Achievement: A Cross-lagged Longitudinal Study on Three Different Age Groups. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0205-2
Kroløkke, C., & Sørensen, A. S. (Eds.). (2006). Gender Communication Theories & Analyses: From Silence to Performance. Sage Publications.
Liberante, L. (2012). The Importance of Teacher–Student Relationships, as Explored through the Lens of the NSW Quality Teaching Model. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2(1), 2–9.
Longino, H.E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.
Loss, J. (2000). The Communications Contract. The Internal Auditor, 57(6), 88.
Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Communication: The Process, Barriers, And Improving Effectiveness. Sam Houston State University, 1(1), 1–11.
Maes, J. D., Weldy, T. G., & Icenogle, M. L. (1997). A Managerial Perspective: Oral Communication Competency is Most Important for Business Students in the Workplace. Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 67–80.
McCarthy, M. R., & Carter, R. (Eds.). (2001). Ten Criteria for a Spoken Grammar. In New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (pp. 63–88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605030-10
Mehrabian, F., Karimi, Z., Damashkhah, Z., Rafizadeh, A., & Slemi, K. (2014). Characteristics of the Capable Teacher from the Viewpoint of the Students at Faculty of Health. Educational Research in Medical Sciences, 2(3) 26-29.
Morreale, S. P., Michael M, & Osborn Judy C. Pearson. (2000). Why Communication is Important: A Rationale for the Centrality of the Study of Communication. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 1–15.
Mulyana, D. (2009). Ilmu Komunikasi. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Nominate, N. (2016). Communication Skill for Teachers: An Overview.
Osakwe, R. N. (2009). Dimensions of Communication as Predictors of Effective Classroom Interaction. Studies on Home and Community Science, 3(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737189.2009.11885277
Pennings, H. J. M., Brekelmans, M., Sadler, P., Claessens, L. C. A., Van Der Want, A. C., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2018). Interpersonal Adaptation in Teacher-Student Interaction. Learning and Instruction, 55, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.005
Petrie, P., & Petrie, P. (Eds.). (2011). Communication Skills for Working with Children and Young People: Introducing Social Pedagogy (3rd ed). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Pratiwi, H.A. (2016). Komunikasi Interpersonal Mahasiswa Dengan Dosen (Tinjauan Communication Apprehension Pada Mahasiswa Universitas di Jakarta). Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, 8(1), 48–60.
Purwatiningsih, S.D. (2008). Stukturalis dan Standpoint Theory. Dalam Komunikasi Pembangunan. Jurnal Ilmiah Satya Negara Indonesia, 1(2).
Rakhmat, J. (2013). Psikologi Komunikasi. (T. Surjaman, Ed.; Cetakan kedua puluh sembilan. Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
Rubie-Davies, C. M., Peterson, E. R., Sibley, C. G., & Rosenthal, R. (2015). A Teacher Expectation Intervention: Modelling the Practices of High Expectation Teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.003
Sadler, P., Ethier, N., Gunn, G. R., Duong, D., & Woody, E. (2009). Are We on the Same Wavelength? Interpersonal Complementarity as Shared Cyclical Patterns during Interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016232
Sadler, P., & Woody, E. (2003). Is who You are who You’re Talking to? Interpersonal Style and Complementarily in Mixed-sex Interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.80
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., ... & Salamounova, Z. (2019). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learning and instruction, 63, 101217.
Seghedin, E. (2012). Communication–the Main Component of Teaching Competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.420
Smith, C. (2013). The Seven Barriers of Communication.
Verweij, Y. (2017). Look Who’s Talking: An Investigation of Feminist Standpoint Theory in Secondary Education of English Literature [Thesis Gender Studies]. Utrech University: Faculty of Humanity.
Verweij, Y. (2016). Look Who’s Talking: An Investigation of Feminist Standpoint Theory in Secondary Education of English Literature. Utrecht University
Williams, K. D., & Nida, S. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and Coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402480
Wirth, J. H., Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., & Williams, K. D. (2010). Eye Gaze as Relational Evaluation: Averted Eye Gaze Leads to Feelings of Ostracism and Relational Devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210370032
Wood, J. T. (2009). Gender and Moral Voice: Moving from Woman’s Nature to Standpoint Epistemology. Women’s Studies in Communication, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1992.11089757
Wood, J. T. (2011). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (9th ed). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Wubbels, T., Creton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline Problems of Beginning Teachers: Interactional Teacher Behavior Mapped Out. Resources in Education, 20, 153.
Wubbels, T., den Brok, P., Van Tartwijk, J., & Levy, J. (2012). Interpersonal Relationships in Education: An Overview of Contemporary Research. Sense Publishers.
Wylie, A., & Sismondo, S. (2015). Standpoint Theory in Science. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 324–330). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.85032-1
DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v9i2.19488
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 3 timesPDF - 2 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AL IBTIDA Journal Indexed By:
2.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Published by Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon In Collaboration with Perkumpulan Dosen Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (PD PGMI) Indonesia.
Editorial Office:
FITK Building, 5th Floor, Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132 Phone. 0231-481264, Fax. 0231-489926, Email: alibtida@syekhnurjati.ac.id/ alibtida2@gmail.com