Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara
PAHAM INKAR AS-SUNNAH DAN PROPAGANDANYA TENTANG HADIS NABI SAW (STUDI KRITIS TERHADAP PANDANGAN INKAR AS-SUNNAH TENTANG KEDUDUKAN DAN KEHUJJAHAN HADIS NABI SAW)
(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research aims to answer the accusations of the Inkar as-Sunnah who reject
the hadiths of the Prophet, either in whole or in part. This study used the library
research method by tracing and examining the books of scholars, journal articles,
youtube etc. There are two very basic doubts argued by munkiru as-Sunnah in
according with this problem; namely first, the inauthenticity of hadith since it had
been only written after the Prophet Muhammad died, so that they only adhered to
the Qur’an as a source of Islamic teachings and second, the rejection of hadith
Ä€hÄd for its poorness of trustworthy. These two doubts are answered, first by the
fact that some of the Prophet's companions had written hadith since he still alive.
Meanwhile, the following doubts are disputed by the validity of religious teachings,
even though only conveyed by one or two men.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
al-Qur’Än al-KarÄ«m
‘Abdul GhaffÄr, Muḥammad Ḥasan. 2020. “TaisÄ«r Uṣūl al-Fiqh li al-Mubtadi’īn (7) .†July 12, 2020. https://www. y o u t u b e . c o m / w a t c h ? v = 6 1 e _ b8vlSJE&list=PLWzzF688g_ngKfc54- IZLuXOn7V8cJUCl&index=8.
al-HaitamÄ«, Ibnu Ḥajar. 2000. Al-MinhÄj al-QawÄ«m. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al- ’Ilmiyyah.
al-Khaá¹Ä«b, ‘Abdullah bin ‘AbdurraḥmÄn. n.d. Al-Radd ’ala MazÄ’im al-MustashriqÄ«n. Madinah: Majma’ al-Malik Fahd.
al-Kinaini, Hanan Chasib Mohammed. 2018. “Ḥujjiyyah Khabar Al-ĀḥÄd ’Inda al- FuqahÄ’ Wa al-MuḥadditsÄ«n.†Journal of Imam Al-Kadhum University College 2 (2): 259–90.
al-NaisabÅ«rÄ«, Muslim bin al-ḤajjÄj. 2013. á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Kairo: DÄr al-Fajr li al-Turath.
al-Namlah, ‘Abdul KarÄ«m bin ‘AlÄ« bin Muḥammad. 1999. Al-Muhadhdhab FÄ« ’Ilm Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-MuqÄran. 1st ed. Vol. 5. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Rushd.
Al-NawawÄ«, MuḥyiddÄ«n. 2007. RiyaḠAl- SÄliḥīn. Edited by MÄhir al-Faḥl. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Damaskus: DÄr Ibn KatsÄ«r.
al-SyaibÄinÄ«, Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal. 2001. Musnad al-Imam Aḥmad bin Ḥanbal. 2nd ed. Vol. 35. Beirut: Mu’assasah al- RisÄlah.
al-ṬahhÄn, MaḥmÅ«d. 2010. TaisÄ«r Musá¹alÄh al-HadÄ«th. 11th ed. Vol. 1. Riyadh: Maktabah al-Ma’Ärif li al-Nashr wa al- Tauzī’.
Bullah, Habieb. 2018. “Pandangan Mustafa Mahmud Terhadap Hadis Syafa’at (Studi Tentang Pengingkar Sunnah).†Al-Mada 1 (1): 49–59.
Faudah, Sa’id. 2020. “Hal Al-AsyÄ’irah LÄ YahtajjÅ«na bi HadÄ«th al-ĀḥÄd fÄ« al- ’AqÄ«dah.†August 31, 2020. https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=xXIhBppMhGk.
Khon, Abdul Majid. 2012. “Paham Inkar Sunnah di Indonesia (Studi Tentang Pemikirannya).†Theologia 23 (1): 57–74.
Majma’ al-Lughah al-’Arabiyyah. 2004. Al- Mu’jam Al-wasÄ«á¹. Kairo: Maktabah al- ShurÅ«q al-Dauliyyah.
Mudhiiah, Khoridatul. 2013. “Pemikiran Daud Rasyid Terhadap Upaya Ingkar Sunnah Kelompok Orientalis Di Indonesia.†Addin 7 (2): 431–50.
Mutualli, Abdul. 2018. “Dikotomi Hadis Ahad-Mutawatir; Menurut Pandangan Ali Mustafa Yaqub.†Tahdis 9 (2): 200–219.
Suhandi. 2015. “Ingkar Sunnah (Sejarah, Argumentasi, Dan Respon Ulama Hadits).†Al-Dzikra 9 (1): 93–115.
Yaqub, Ali Mustafa. 2020. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus.
DOI: 10.24235/jshn.v5i1.15032
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
 
  
  
 
 
 
  
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0
Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara (JSHN)
Department of Hadith Studies | Faculty of Ushuluddin and Adab | Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Jl. Perjuangan By Pass Sunyaragi, Kesambi, Karyamulya, Kota Cirebon, Jawa Barat 45132
E-mail: jurnalstudihadisnusantara@uinssc.ac.id