Integrating PhET Interactive Simulation to Enhance Students' Mathematical Understanding and Engagement in Learning Mixed Fraction

Slamet Arifin(1*), Fazilah Binti Razali(2), Winanjar Rahayu(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universiti Putra Malaysia
(3) Universitas Negeri Malang
(*) Corresponding Author



This study aims to document how integrating PhET interactive simulations into mathematics learning enhances students' conceptual understanding of mixed fraction material. This collaborative action research project adhered to the action research cycle proposed by Kemmis and McTaggart. In total 17 4th-grade students from one of the public elementary schools in Malang City, Indonesia participated in this investigation. The data was collected through tests, interviews, and classroom observation. The test of students' mathematical understanding (TSMU) was administered to the students at the pre-cycle, post-cycle I, and post-cycle II stages. The number of questions given in each test was 10 mathematical problems, and they were designed to assess students' mathematical understanding of mixed fractions. The quantitative data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics using SPSS 25, and the qualitative data was analyzed simultaneously using a qualitative data analysis cycle.  The research findings unveiled the following key insights. First, we found a notable enhancement in students' mathematical understanding of mixed fractions emerged throughout the study. Specifically, the pre-cycle average score for students' mathematical understanding stood at M=51.59, which saw substantial improvement in the post-cycle I phase (M=61.53) and further growth in the post-cycle II phase (M=76.94). Moreover, the utilization of PhET simulations was found to significantly enhance students' engagement in the realm of mathematics learning. Therefore, the integration of PhET interactive simulation in mathematics learning has been shown to have a significant effect on improving students' mathematical understanding and engagement in learning fractions.

Keywords: PhET interactive simulation, conceptual understanding, mixed fractions, students’ engagement.



Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendokumentasikan bagaimana integrasi PhET interactive simulation ke dalam pembelajaran matematika meningkatkan pemahaman konseptual siswa pada materi pecahan campuran. Desain penelitian tindakan kelas kolaboratif (PTK) dilaksanakan mengikuti siklus penelitian tindakan Kemmis dan McTaggart. Sebanyak 17 siswa kelas 4 di salah satu sekolah dasar negeri di Kota Malang, Indonesia dilibatkan dalam penelitian ini. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui tes, wawancara, dan observasi kelas. Tes pemahaman matematis siswa (TPMS) diberikan kepada siswa pada tahap pra siklus, pasca siklus I, dan pasca siklus II. Jumlah soal yang diberikan dalam setiap tes adalah 10 soal matematika, dan dirancang untuk menilai pemahaman matematis siswa tentang pecahan campuran. Data kuantitatif dianalisis dengan menggunakan statistik deskriptif menggunakan SPSS 25, dan data kualitatif dianalisis secara simultan mengacu pada siklus analisis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa: (1) terdapat peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa pada materi pecahan campuran. Hasl ini ditunjukan dengan rata-rata hasil TPMS pada pra-siklus M=51,59, pasca siklus I M=61,53, dan pasca siklus II M=76,94; (2) penggunaan PhET interactive simulation terbukti berkontribusi dalam meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Oleh karena itu, integrasi simulasi interaktif PhET dalam pembelajaran matematika terbukti memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap peningkatan pemahaman konsep matematis pecahan campuran siswa.

Keywords: PhET interactive simulation, pemahaman matematis, pecahan campuran, keterlibatan siswa.

Full Text:



Adams, W. K. (2010). Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations. Nuovo Cimento Della Societa Italiana Di Fisica C, 33(3), 21–32.

Arifin, S., Wahyudin, W., & Herman, T. (2020). The effects of contextual group-guided discovery learning on students' mathematical understanding and reasoning. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 8(2), 106–114.

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2).

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127–141.

Bedada, T. B., & Machaba, F. (2022). The effect of GeoGebra on STEM students learning trigonometric function. Cogent Education, 9 (1), 1 - 18

Birgin, O., & Acar, H. (2020). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning using GeoGebra software on 11th grade students’ mathematics achievement in exponential and logarithmic functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–18.

Boaler, J. (2022). Mathematical Mindsets: Unleashing Students’ Potential through Creative Mathematics, Inspiring Messages and Innovative Teaching, 2nd Edition. Jossey-Bass Inc.

Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Cwiakala, K., & Whorley, A. (2020). Learning Fraction Concepts Through the Virtual-Abstract Instructional Sequence. Journal of Behavioral Education, 29(3), 519–542.

Buteau, C., Muller, E., Marshall, N., Sacristán, A. I., & Mgombelo, J. (2016). Undergraduate Mathematics Students Appropriating Programming as a Tool for Modelling, Simulation, and Visualization: A Case Study. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2(2), 142–166.

Cai, J., & Ding, M. (2017). On mathematical understanding: perspectives of experienced Chinese mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(1), 5–29.

Chen, B. B., Yakubova, G., & Hughes, E. M. (2022). Mathematics support strategies for teaching students with ASD to solve fraction computation problems: An exploratory A-B design study. Preventing School Failure, 66(2), 99–108.

Chotimah, C., & Festiyed. (2020). A meta-analysis of the effects of using PhET interactive simulations on students' worksheets toward senior high school students learning result of physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1).

Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2021). Teachers’ conceptual understanding of fraction operations: results from a national sample of elementary school teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(3), 525–545.

Fauzi, I., & Suryadi, D. (2020). The Analysis of Students’ Learning Obstacles on the Fraction Addition Material for Five Graders of Elementary Schools. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(1), 33.

Harvey, R. (2012). Stretching student teachers’ understanding of fractions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(4), 493–511.

Hernández, A., Perdomo-Díaz, J., & Camacho-Machín, M. (2020). Mathematical understanding in problem solving with GeoGebra: a case study in initial teacher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 208–223.

Hunt, J. H., Tzur, R., & Westenskow, A. (2016). Evolution of Unit Fraction Conceptions in Two Fifth-Graders with a Learning Disability: An Exploratory Study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(3), 182–208.

Ivars, P., Fernández, C., & Llinares, S. (2020). A Learning Trajectory as a Scaffold for Pre-service Teachers’ Noticing of Students’ Mathematical Understanding. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 529–548.

Kazak, S., Wegerif, R., & Fujita, T. (2015). The importance of dialogic processes to conceptual development in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(2), 105–120.

Koopman, M., Thurlings, M., & den Brok, P. (2019). Factors influencing students’ proficiency development in the fraction domain: the role of teacher cognitions and behaviour. Research Papers in Education, 34(1), 14–37.

Leng, K. S., Razali, F., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2020). The effectiveness of realistic mathematics education approach toward students learning: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(13), 548-552.

NCTM. (2000). Principles Standards and for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.

NCTM. (2014). Principles to actions : ensuring mathematical success for all. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Pedersen, P. L., Aunio, P., Sunde, P. B., Bjerre, M., & Waagepetersen, R. (2022). Differences in High- and Low-Performing Students’ Fraction Learning in the Fourth Grade. Journal of Experimental Education.

Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students? Learning and Instruction, 65.

Uwamahoro, J., Ndihokubwayo, K., Ralph, M., & Ndayambaje, I. (2021). Physics Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Geometric Optics: Revisited Analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 706–718.

Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2001). Making sense of world problems. ZDM, 33(1), 27–29.

Viberg, O., Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2023). Integrating digital technology in mathematics education: a Swedish case study. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 232–243.

Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. J. (2019). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding using an online three-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 678–689.

Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1).

Yohannes, A., & Chen, H. L. (2021). GeoGebra in mathematics education: a systematic review of journal articles published from 2010 to 2020. In Interactive Learning Environments. Routledge.

Zulnaidi, H., Oktavika, E., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Effect of use of GeoGebra on achievement of high school mathematics students. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 51–72.

DOI: 10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v10i2.15056

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2023 Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

AL IBTIDA Journal Indexed By:




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats


Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI Published by Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon In Collaboration with Perkumpulan Dosen Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (PD PGMI) Indonesia.

Editorial Office:

FITK Building, 5th Floor, Department of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon.  Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132 Phone. 0231-481264, Fax. 0231-489926, Email: