PERAN PEREMPUAN RUT DALAM PENGARUSUTAMAAN MULTIKULTURALITAS PADA MASYARAKAT YAHUDI PASCA-PEMBUANGAN BABILONIA
(1) Universitas Katolik Parahyangan Bandung
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Hidup sebagai orang asing menjadi masalah besar dan kompleks dalam sejarah manusia, termasuk dalam Perjanjian Lama. Kitab Rut menjadi salah satu kitab yang memuat narasi tentang hidup sebagai orang asing. Elimelekh dan keluarganya hidup sebagai orang asing di tanah Moab. Selanjutnya Rut yang mengikuti dengan ibu mertuanya, hidup sebagai orang asing di Yehuda, kampung halaman ibu mertuanya tersebut. Kondisi sebagai orang asing itu tidak membuat Rut takut. Sebaliknya, ia menunjukkan keberanian untuk membuka diri dan beradaptasi dengan budaya baru tempatnya hidup sekarang. Tindakannya menjadi inspirasi untuk menumbuhkan semangat pluralisme dan multikulturalisme. Melalui analisis kritis dalam penelitian ini, pembaca dapat melihat bagaimana benih eksklusivisme dan radikalisme muncul di masa pasca-pembuangan di antara bangsa Yahudi. Akan tetapi, keberanian perempuan Rut menjadi cahaya yang menerangi kegelapan eksklusivitas menuju perayaan atas multikulturalisme. Pembaca dapat mengambil inspirasi dari hidup Rut untuk membuka diri terhadap keragaman dan multikulturalisme. Tindakannya sekaligus menjadi inspirasi untuk mengarusutamakan semangat multikulturalisme.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul Halim, Iim. 2017. “Agama Yahudi sebagai Fakta Sejarah dan Sosial Keagamaan.†Religious: Jurnal Agama dan Lintas Budaya, Vol.1, No.2, Maret 2017: 135-146.
Aigrain, R. 2000. L’hagiographie. Ses sources – Ses méthodes – Son histoire. Riproduzione senza cambiamenti dell’edizione originale del 1953. Con un Complément bibliographique dir R. Godding. Bruxelles, 2000.
Awijaya, Agetta Putri. 2019. “Eksklusivisme dan Radikalisme dalam Kitab Ezra.†Indonesian Journal of Theology, Vo.7, No.2, Desember 2019: 111-134.
Bar-Efrat, Shimon. Narrative Art of Bible. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Barth-Frommel, M.C. 2003. Hati Allah Bagaikan Hati Seorang Ibu. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Baxter, J. Sidlow. 2012. Menggali Isi Alkitab Kejadian sampai dengan Ester. Jakarta: Yayasan Komunikasi Bina Kasih/OMF.
Bénitez, Milton Acosta. 2016. “Commentary on Ruth.†Journal of Latin American Theology: Christian Reflection from the Latino South, Vol.11, No.11, 2016.
Berman, Joshua A. 2007. “Ancient Hermeneutics and the Legal Structure of the Book of Ruth.†Zeitzchrift für die alltestamentliche Wissenschaft, Vol.119, No.1.
Bogdan, Robert and Taylor, Steven J. 1975. Introduction in Qualitative Research Methods. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Brock, R.N. 1988. Journey to Heart: A Christology of Erotic Power. New York: Crossroad.
Bruce, Steve. 1996. Religion in the modern world: From cathedrals to cults. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carrol, M. Daniel. 2015. “Once Stranger, Always a Stranger? Immigration, Assimilation, and the Book of Ruth.†International Bulletin of Missionary Research, Vol.39, No.4, October 2015.
D’Angelo, Mary Rose. 1999. “Gender and Power in the Gospel of Mark: The Daughter of Jairus and the Woman with the Flow of Blood,†John C. Cavadini (ed.). Miracles in Jewish and Christian Antiquity: Imagining Truth. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press: 83-109.
de Villiers, Gerda. 2017. “Ecodomy: Taking risks and overstepping boundaries in the Book of Ruth.†Verbum et Ecclesia, suppl.1, Vol.38, No.3: 35-50.
Dimont, Max I. 1993. Jews, God and History. Terjemahan oleh Al Tor. Bandung: Eraseni Media.
Doob Sakenfeld, K. 1999. Ruth. Interpretation, A Bible commentary for teaching and Preaching. Louisville: John Knox Press.
Dorival, Giles. 2007. “Has the Category of ‘Deuterocanonical Books’ a Jewish Origin?†Xeravits, Géza G. and Zsenggelér, Jószef. The Books of the Maccabees: History, Theology, Ideology. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Dubin, Lois C. 1994. “Fullness and Emptiness: Meditation on Naomi’s Tale in the Book of Ruth.†Judith A. Kates and Gail T. Reimer. Reading Ruth: Contemporary Women Reclaim a Sacred Story. New York: Random House.
Evans, Craig A. 2008. “Introduction.†Evans, Craig A. and Tov, Emanuel (eds.) Exploring the Origins of the Bible: Canon Formation in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective. Grand Rapids: Baker.
Fensham, F. Chales. 1982. The Books of Ezra and Nehemiah. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
Fiorenza, E.S. 2001. Wisdom Way. Introducing Feminist Biblical Interpretation. New York: Orbis Books.
Frevel, C. 1992. Das Buch Rut. Stuttgart: Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk.
Frew, R. 1949. Notes on New Testament Explanatory and Practical. Grand Rapids, MI.: Baker Books.
Grabbe, Lester L. 2004. A History of the Jews and Judaism in the Second Temple Period. London: T & T Clark.
Gottwald, Norman K. 1962. A Hebrew Bible: A Socio Literary Introduction. London: Oxford University Press.
Hadi, Sutrisno. 2005. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Psikologi UGM.
Hamlin, E. John. 1996. Surely is the Future. A Commentary on the Book of Ruth. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
Hill, Andrew E and Walton, John H. 2004. Survei Perjanjian Lama. Malang: Gandum Mas.
Hoffmeier, James K. 2009. The Immigration Crisis. Immigrants, Aliens, and the Bible. Wheaton: Crossway Books.
Holmstedt, Robert D. Ruth. A Handbook on the Hebrew Text. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press.
Jones III, Edward Allen. 2016. Reading Ruth in the Restoration Period. A Call fo Inclusion. Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies, 604. New York: Bloomsbury T & T Clak.
Kapojos, Shintia Maria dan Wijaya, Hengki. 2018. “Perwujudan Kasih Setia Allah terhadap Kesetiaan Ruth.†Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat, Vol.2, No.2, Juli 2018: 99-104.
Kennedy, J. Hardee. 1970. “Ruth.†The Broadman Bible Commentary. New York: Broadman Press.
Köhlmoos, M. 2010. Ruth. Göttingen; Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Komisi Kitab Suci Kepausan. 2003. Penafsiran Alkitab dalam Gereja. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Korpel, M.C.A. 2001. The structure of the Book of Ruth. Assen: Koninklijke van Gorcum.
LaCocque, A. 2004. Ruth. Transl. K.C. Hanson. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Macchi, Jean-Daniel. 2010. Introduction à l’Ancien Testament. Genève: Université de Genève.
Maiaweng, Peniel C.D. dan Ukung, Christina. 2018. “Apakah Rut, Perempuan Moab Adalah Penyembah TUHAN?†Jurnal Jaffray, Vol.16, No.2, Oktober 2018.
Mantra, Ida Bagus. 2008. Filsafat Penelitian dan Metode Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Moen Saxegaard, K. 2010. Character complexity in the Book of Ruth. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhdaliha, B. dan Arlena, W. 2017. “Malay, China and India Ethnicities Representation. Case Study: Ethnography and Manga Matrix Analysis Character.†Wacana, Vol.16, No.1, Juni 2017: 15-26.
Ndolu, Nelci Nafalia dan Rantesalu, Marsi Bombongan. 2019. “Makna Tanah Leluhur bagi Naomi Berdasarkan Rut 1:1-22.†JIREH – Jurnal Ilmiah Religiosity Entity Humanity, Vol.1, No.1, Juni 2019: 87-98.
Nielsen, K. 1997. Ruth: A Commentary. Transl. E. Broadbridge. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Niggemann, Andrew J. 2017. “Matriach of Israel or Misnomer? Israelite Self-Identification in Ancient Israelite Law Code and the Implications for Ruth.†Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, Vol.41, No.3.
Ress, Anthony. 2015. “The Boaz Solution: Reading Ruth in Light of Australian Asylum Seeker Discourse.†Reading Ruth in Asia. Atlanta: SBL Press.
Roop, Eugene F. 2002. Ruth, Jonah, Esther: Believers Church Bible Commentary. Scotdale: Herald Press.
Sin, Sia Kok. 2019. “Hidup sebagai Orang Asing Berdasarkan Kitab Rut.†Jurnal Theologi Aletheia, Vol.21, No.17, September 2019: 1-21.
Siquans, Agnethe. 2009. “Foreignness and Poverty in the Book of Ruth: A Legal Way forr a Poor Foreign Woman to Be Integrated into Israel.†Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol.128, No.3, 445.
Sitompul, A.A. dan Beyer, Ulrich. 1973. Metode Penafsiran Alkitab. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia.
Soulissa, Margareth Ch.H., Kristiawan, Ragil, dan Gidion. 2020. “Studi Deskriptif Pemahaman Mahasiswi Angkatan 26 tentang Karakter Wanita Saleh Bedasarkan Kitab Rut di Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Kristus Alfa Omega Semaang.†Journal of Theological Students, Vol.9, No.1: 40-52.
Spira, E.G. 2015. Paradies und Sündenfall. Stoffe und Motive der Genesis 3-Rezeption von Tertullian bis Ambrosius. Berlin: Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Sugiarto, Eko. 2015. Menyusun Proposal Penelitian Kualitatif Skripsi dan Tesis. Yogyakarta: Suaka Media.
Sweeney, Marvin A. 1997. “Tanakh versus Old Testament: Concerning the Foundation for a Jewish Theology of the Bible.†Sun, H.T.C. and Eades, K.L. (eds.). Problems in Biblical Theology: Essays in Honor of Rolf Knierim. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tong, Sin-Lung. 2015. “The Key to Succesful Migration? Rereading Ruth’s Confession (1:16-17) through the Lens of Bhabha’s Minincry.†Reading Ruth in Asia. Atlanta: SBL Press.
Volf, Miroslav. 1996. Exclusion and Embrace: A Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness, and Reconciliation. Nashville, TN: Abington Press.
Wetter, A-M. 2014. “The Stranger in God’s Land – foreigner, stranger, guest: What can we learn from Israel’s attitude towards strangers?†Old Testament Essays, Vol.27, No.3: 1129-1154.
Williamson, H.G.M. 1985. Word Biblical Commentary. Waco, Texas: Word Books.
DOI: 10.24235/equalita.v3i1.8353
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Equalita: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Indexed By:
EDITORIAL OFFICE:
LP2M Building, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. Perjuangan Street of Sunyaragi, Cirebon City, West Java, Indonesia 45132 Phone. 0231-489926.
Â
Equalita: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.