MODEL PENILAIAN HASIL BELAJAR DAN KARAKTER
(1) Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Mulawarman
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of student learning and character assessment. The assessment of student learning has been focus more on mastery of material, but less attention to aspects of character. Whereas in education has two dimensions of purpose, namely to be smart and good morals. Intelligence has related to cognitive, while character has related to affective. Through this study, has expected to obtain a model of assessment that involves cognitive and affective aspects in an integrated manner. The method of study has done in compiling the article through literature study, i.e. studying the theory or opinion relating to student learning assessment. Based on this study, it concluded that: (1) Assessment of learning and character carried out independently. (2) Teachers face constraints assessing the character of students. (3) There are a number of interventions to the teacher's assessment; (4) Collaborative assessment of learning and character makes it easier for teachers and schools to make responsible decisions. (5) Assessment of learning has a positive implication on the formation of student character or otherwise.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alvarez, B. dan Casares (ed). 1998. Evaluation and Educational Reform: Policy option. U.S. Agency for International Development.
Apple, D.K. & Krumsieg. K. 1998. Process Education Teaching Institute Handbook. Pacific Crest.
Arifin, Z. 2013. Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya.
Bastanfar, A. 2012. Alternatives in Assessment. Islamic Azad University, Khoy, Iran.
Darsono, Imam. 2013. Peran Guru Dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran. SNEP I Tahun 2013:503-511.
Djemari, M. 2010. Penilaian Pendidikan Karakter, Bahan Tulisan Pendidikan Karakter Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, http://staff.uny.ac.id/Sites/default/tmp/ Penilaian_karakter.pdf. (Diakses 19-08-2017).
Easley, M.F. 2002. Character and Civic Education. Public Schools of North Carolina. Raleigh.
Harahap, Nursapi. 2014. Penelitian Keputakaan. Jurnal Iqra’ Volume 08 No.01 Mei, hlm 68-74.
Kaimuddin. 2014. Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Dinamika Ilmu Vol. 14. No 1, Juni 2014: 47-65.
Kizlik, B. 2012. Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Education. http://www.adprima.com /measurement.htm (Diakses tanggal 02-03-2017).
Lynch, B.K. 2001. Rethinking Assessment from a Critical Perspective. Language Testing 18 (4), 2001: 351–372.
Marzuki. 2018. Konsep Dasar Pendidikan Karakter. http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/.../57-konsep-dasar-pendidikan-karakter-marzuki.pdf. (Diakses tanggal 02-01-2018).
McAlpine, M. 2002. Principles of Assessment. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, Robert Clark Center for Technological Education.http://www.caacentre.ac.uk/dldocs/Bluepaper1.pdf. (Diakses tanggal 02-01-2018).
Nahdi, D.S. 2017. Membentuk Karakter Siswa Dengan Menanamkan Nilai-nilai Matematika. Naturalistic: Jurnal Kajian Penelitan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. Vol 2, No. 1, Oktober 2017: 1-7.
Poerwanti, Endang. 2015. Konsep Dasar Asesmen Pembelajaran. https://sites.google.com/site/ asesmenpembelajaran/unit-1. (Diakses tanggal 05-01-2018).
Popham, W.J. 2014. Classroom-Observation Evidence in Teacher Evaluation: Playing the Ponies. Los Angeles, University of California.
Saefuddin, A. 2012. Merancang Teknik Penilaian Berbasis Kelas: Jurnal IIP Volume. XVII No. 1 2012/1433: 47-65.
Scanlan, CL. 2012. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Grading. http://www.umdnj.edu/idsweb /idst5350 /assess_eval_test_grade.htm (Diakses tanggal 02-03-2017).
Sobri, AY. 2010. Menumbuhkan Nilai Karakter Siswa di sekolah. http://ap.fip.um.ac.id/wp-content/ uploads/2015/10/1-ahmad-yusuf-sobri.pdf.
Suryabrata, Sumadi. 1995. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Sutijan, Hasan Makhfud, Lies Lestari, dan Chumdari. 2015. Pengembangan instrumen penilaian pendidikan karakter terpada. Jurnal Paedagogia, Vol. 18 No. 2 Tahun 2015:1-9.
Wahyuni, E.S. 2011. Pedoman Teknik Penulisan Laporan Studi Pustaka. Mayor Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat Fakultas Ekologi Manusia IPB. Bogor: IPB.
Zed, Mestika. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. 2008, dalam Khatibah. 2011. Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jurnal Iqra’ Volume 05 No.01 Mei, 2011: 36-39.
DOI: 10.24235/edueksos.v6i2.2649
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 153 timesPDF - 115 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Edueksos : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial dan Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.