The Influence of Digital Literacy on The Use of Online Tutoring Systems According To Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The grade of education in Indonesia is still in the "Medium" category and the low level of digital literacy indicates that the learning process in the classroom is not yet optimal. One form of effort that can be made to deal with this problem is by following the online tutoring system in the hope of improving their learning abilities so that they can improve results according to expectations. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors that can influence the use of an online tutoring system based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Some researchers try to add external variables with the aim of developing TAM theory. This research adds digital literacy factors that focus on students as new research. The population of this research was 9,042 senior high school students in Surakarta and 270 students were used as samples. This study used a quantitative method. Research data was collected by spreading questionnaires online with GForm. The data collection technique used was non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling approach. Data analysis was carried out using hierarchical regression analysis and the Sobel test. The research results show that perceived usefulness, ease of use, and digital literacy have a positive influence on the use of online tutoring systems. Digital literacy has also been proven to have an influence on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use. Then perceived usefulness and ease of use were also attested to mediate the connection between digital literacy and the use of online tutoring systems.
Keywords: Digital Literacy, Online Tutoring System, TAM
Full Text:
PDF 199-214References
Alassafi, M. O. (2022). E-learning intention material using TAM: A case study. Materials Today: Proceedings, 61, 873–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.457
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics’ Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Management Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2014.050120
Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
Belawati, T. (2019). Pembelajaran Online. Universitas Terbuka.
Cetindamar, D., Abedin, B., & Shirahada, K. (2021). The Role of Employees in Digital Transformation: A Preliminary Study on How Employees’ Digital Literacy Impacts Use of Digital Technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3087724
Chan, A. J., Hooi, L. W., & Ngui, K. S. (2021). Do Digital Literacies Matter In Employee Engagement In Digitalised Workplace? Journal of Asia Business Studies, 15(3), 523–540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-08-2020-0318
Chen, J. L. (2011). The effects of education compatibility and technological expectancy on e-learning acceptance. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.009
Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2020). Determinants of E-government Adoption: Testing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(10), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1660989
Chung, J. E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J., & Mclaughlin, M. (2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1674–1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Cengage Learning.
Davis, F. (1989). Of Maids’ Uniforms and Blue Jeans: The Drama of Status Ambivalences in Clothing and Fashion*. In Qualitative Sociology (Vol. 12, Issue 4).
GarcÃa Iglesias, M. J., Pérez MartÃnez, C., Gutiérrez MartÃn, C. B., DÃez Laiz, R., & Sahagún Prieto, A. M. (2018). Mixed-method tutoring support improves learning outcomes of veterinary students in basic subjects. BMC Veterinary Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1330-6
Hao, S., Dennen, V. P., & Mei, L. (2017). Influential factors for mobile learning acceptance among Chinese users. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9465-2
Hartono, J. (2007). Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan. Andi.
Izuagbe, R., Ibrahim, N. A., Ogiamien, L. O., Olawoyin, O. R., Nwokeoma, N. M., Ilo, P. I., & Osayande, O. (2019). Effect of perceived ease of use on librarians’ e-skills: Basis for library technology acceptance intention. Library and Information Science Research, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100969
Jackson, A., Godwin, A., Bartholomew, S., & Mentzer, N. (2022). Learning from failure: A systematized review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(3), 1853–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09661-x
Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2006). A framework for guiding policy-makers intervening in emerging innovation systems in “catching-up†countries. European Journal of Development Research, 18(4), 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09578810601094902
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212
Kemdikbud.go.id. (2023). RAPOR-PENDIDIKAN-INDONESIA-2023. https://raporpendidikan.kemdikbud.go.id
Kemenkominfo. (2022). Status Literasi Digital di Indonesia 2022. Kominfo, November, 205–207. https://www.c2es.org/content/renewable-energy/
Koltay, T. (2011). The Media and The Literacies: Media Literacy, Information Literacy, Digital Literacy, Media, Culture & Society.
LTMPT, L. T. M. P. T. (2022). Top 1000 Sekolah Tahun 2002 Berdasarkan Nilai UTBK. https://top-1000-sekolah.ltmpt.ac.id/
Mertala, P. (2020). Paradoxes of participation in the digitalization of education: a narrative account. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1696362
Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
Middleton, L., Hall, H., Muir, L., & Raeside, R. (2018). The Interaction Between People, Information and Innovation: Information Literacy to Underpin Innovative Work Behaviour in a Finnish Organisation.
Nikou, S., & Aavakare, M. (2021). An assessment of the interplay between literacy and digital Technology in Higher Education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3893–3915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10451-0
Nikou, S., De Reuver, M., & Mahboob Kanafi, M. (2022). Workplace literacy skills—how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0241
Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia Belajar dari Hasil PISA 2018. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud, 021, 1–206. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/16742/1/Laporan Nasional PISA 2018 Indonesia.pdf
Rafi, M., JianMing, Z., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Technology integration for students’ information and digital literacy education in academic libraries. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(4), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-07-2019-0049
Rafique, H., Almagrabi, A. O., Shamim, A., Anwar, F., & Bashir, A. K. (2020). Investigating the Acceptance of Mobile Library Applications with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers and Education, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103732
Shen, C. C., & Chiou, J. S. (2010). The impact of perceived ease of use on Internet service adoption: The moderating effects of temporal distance and perceived risk. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.003
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta.
Sujarweni, W. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Pustaka Barupress.
Sutanonpaiboon, J., & Pearson, A. M. (2006). E-commerce adoption: Perceptions of managers/owners of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Thailand. Journal of Internet Commerce, 5(3), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1300/J179v05n03_03
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
DOI: 10.24235/edueksos.v13i01.17214
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF 199-214 - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Edueksos Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Ekonomi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.