SISTEM SANAD DALAM TRADISI YAHUDI DAN ISLAM: Studi Perbandingan antara Sanad Mishnah dan Sanad Hadis

Muhammad Ghifari(1*),


(1) Institut Daarul Qur’an Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This article aims to examine the system of isnad in Jewish and Islamic traditions, specifically focusing on the isnad of Mishnah and the isnad of Hadith. The author employs a literature review approach with a comparative analysis to explore the similarities and differences between these two traditions in terms of the definition, significance, authority, and historical development of isnad. The author finds that the system of isnad in Mishnah and Hadith shares a common historical foundation, which is to preserve the authenticity and authority of religious teachings passed down orally from generation to generation. However, the isnad system in Hadith is more complex and methodological compared to the isnad system in Mishnah, as it involves various classifications, criticisms, and evaluations of the isnad and the content of the Hadith. The author also highlights that the isnad system in Mishnah and Hadith plays a significant role in shaping the identity, law, and teachings of Judaism and Islam.

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji sistem sanad dalam tradisi Yahudi dan Islam, khususnya pada sanad Mishnah dan sanad Hadis. Penulis menggunakan jenis penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dengan analisis perbandingan untuk meneliti kesamaan dan perbedaan antara kedua tradisi tersebut dalam hal definisi, urgensi, otoritas, dan sejarah perkembangan sanad. Penulis menemukan bahwa sistem sanad dalam Mishnah dan Hadis memiliki akar sejarah yang sama, yaitu sebagai sarana untuk menjaga keaslian dan otoritas ajaran agama yang diturunkan secara lisan dari generasi ke generasi. Namun, sistem sanad dalam Hadis lebih kompleks dan metodologis daripada sistem sanad dalam Mishnah, karena adanya berbagai macam klasifikasi, kritik, dan evaluasi terhadap sanad dan matan hadis. Penulis juga menunjukkan bahwa sistem sanad dalam Mishnah dan Hadis memiliki peran penting dalam pembentukan identitas, hukum, dan ajaran Yahudi dan Islam.

 

Keywords


Isnad system, Jewish and Islamic traditions, Mishnah isnad, Hadith isnad

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-‘AẓamÄ«, Muḥammad MuṣṭafÄ. Hadis Nabawi dan Sejarah Kodifikasinya, Penerjemah Ali Mustafa Ya’qub. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2000.

__________________________. Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature. Indianapolis: American Trust Publications, 1977.

__________________________. On Schacht’s Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. New Delhi: Islamic Book Service, 2008.

Amin, Mukhlisah. The Criticism of Hadiths’ Sanad in the Interpretation of QS Al-Baqarah (2):282 in Tafsir Al-Mishbah. Makassar: UIN Alauddin, 2018.

Bergmann, Uwe. “The Development of Isnad Analysis in Early Western Islamic Studies.†Der Islam, Vol. 86 No. 1 (2009).

Birnbaum, Philip. Encyclopedia of Jewish Consepts. New York, Hebrew Publishing Company, 1948.

Brown, Jonathan A. C. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2009.

Broyde, Michael J., dan Ira Bedzow. The Codification of Jewish Law and an Introduction to the Jurisprudence of The Mishnah Berura, t.tp: Academic Studies Press, 2014.

Bucaille, Maurice. The Bible, The Qur’an, and Science. Pakistan: El Falah Foundation, t.th.

Cook, Michael. “The Opponents of The Writing of Traditional in Early Islamâ€, Jurnal Arbica XLIV (1997).

____________, Dolsy Smitha. “The IsnÄd as a Literary Device.†Journal of Arabic Literature Vol. XLIX, No. 1 (2018).

Danby, Herbert. The Mishnah: Translated from the Hebrew with Introduction and Brief Explanatory Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933.

Epstein, Isidore. Introduction to the Text of the Mishnah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1948.

Geiger, Abraham. “What Did Muhammad Borrow from Judaism.†Jurnal The Origins of The Koran: Classic Essays on Islam’s Holy Book Leeds: Prometheus Books, 1998.

Ibn KhaldÅ«n, ‘AbdurraḥmÄn bin Muḥammad. Muqaddimah Ibn KhaldÅ«n. Beirut: DÄr al-Fikr, 1986.

Imtyas, Rizkiyatul, Ahmad Fudhaili Hasyim, and Muhammad Ishar Helmi. Methods of Contemporary Sanad Hadith Criticism: (Study on The Understanding Perspective of Middle Eastern Hadith Scholars). EUDL Proceedings of the 4th International Colloquium on Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies in conjunction with the 1st International Conference on Education, Science, Technology, Indonesian and Islamic Studies, ICIIS and ICESTIIS 2021, 20-21 October 2021, Jambi, Indonesia. EAI, 2022.

Joseph Barcklay, Hebrew Literature. New York,1901.

MaḥmÅ«d, ‘Abd al-ḤalÄ«m. Al-Sunnah fÄ« MakÄnatihaÄ wa fÄ« TÄrikhihÄ. Kairo: DÄr al-Kutub al-‘ArabÄ«, 1996.

Motzki, Harald. Analysing Muslim Traditions: Studies in Legal, Exegetical and Maghazi Hadith. Leiden: Brill, 2010.

Neusner, Jacob. Judaism and Islam in Practice: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge, 2005.

____________. The Mishnah: A New Translation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.

____________. The Talmud of Babylonia: An American Translation Vol.II Tractate Shabbat Part A Chapters I-II. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1984.

Robson, James. The Transmission of the Variant Readings of the Qur’an: The Problem of Tawatur and the Emergence of Shawadhdh. Leiden: Brill, 2013.

Rustum, Asad Gabriel. MuṣṭalÄḥ al-TarÄ«kh: Wa huwa Baḥth fÄ« Naqd al-Uṣūl, Beirut: al-Maktabah al-‘Asyriyah, 2012.

Al-Salafi, Muḥammad LuqmÄn. IhtimÄm al-MuḥaddithÄ«n bi Naqd al-HadÄ«th Sanad wa Matn. RiyÄá¸: Maktabah al-RiyÄá¸, 1984.

Al-á¹¢Äliḥ, á¹¢ubḥi. ‘UlÅ«m al-ḤadÄ«th wa MuṣṭalÄḥuhu. Beirut: DÄr al-Fikr, 1973.

Siddiqi, Muhammad Zubayr. Hadith Literature: Its Origin, Development & Special Features. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 1993.

Stemberger, Gunter. Introduction to Rabbinic Literature. New York: Doubleday, 1996.

Strack, Hermann L., dan Gunter Stemberger. Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash (Second Edition). Edinburgh: T&T Clark Ltd., 1996.

Suryadi. Metodologi Ilmu Rijal Hadis. Yogyakarta: Madani Pustaka Hikmah, 2003.

Shuhbah, Muḥammad Muḥammad AbÅ«. FÄ« RiḥÄb al-Sunnah al-Kutub al-á¹¢iḥaḥ al-Sittah. Azhar: Majma’ al-TurÄth, 1969.

Talmud Babilonia, Gittin, f. 60b. 13. London, 1952.

Al-Taziy, MuṣṭafÄ AmÄ«n IbrÄhÄ«m. MuḥadrÄt fÄ« ‘UlÅ«m al-ḤadÄ«th. Mesir: DÄr al-Ta’lÄ«f bi al-MÄliyyah, t.th.

Al-’UmarÄ«, AkrÄm ḌiyÄ’. Buḥuth fÄ« TÄrÄ«kh al-Sunnah al-Mushrafah. Beirut: Basath, 1984.

Ya’qub, Ali Mustafa. Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1995.

Yahya, Farhia. The Life of Abdullah ibn al-Mubarak: The Scholar of the East and the Scholar of the West. Al-Faatih Publishing, 2015.

Zainuddin, Muhammad. Sanad Hadith Criticism: Critical Study of the Prophet’s Companions in Sanad Hadith. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 22, Issue 11, Ver. 5 (November. 2017) PP 91-100. IOSR Journals, 2017.




DOI: 10.24235/diyaafkar.v11i02.14052

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


         

  

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Â